Factors affecting the implementation and sustainability of an Australian community-based doula service: A qualitative study

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah Min-Lee Khaw , Caroline S.E. Homer , Red Dearnley , Kerryn O'Rourke , Meghan A. Bohren
{"title":"Factors affecting the implementation and sustainability of an Australian community-based doula service: A qualitative study","authors":"Sarah Min-Lee Khaw ,&nbsp;Caroline S.E. Homer ,&nbsp;Red Dearnley ,&nbsp;Kerryn O'Rourke ,&nbsp;Meghan A. Bohren","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Community-based doula support for women and gender-diverse birthing people has a range of benefits in improving maternal outcomes and experiences. However, there is limited research on how doula services operate in Australia. Birth for Humankind is an Australian community-based volunteer doula service, which provides free doula support for women and gender diverse birthing people experiencing social discrimination and financial disadvantage. The aim of this study was to understand facilitators and barriers to implementation and sustainability of a community-based doula service delivered to clients concurrently receiving care at a major maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a qualitative study consisting of 30 in-depth interviews with doulas and managers of the community-based doula service Birth for Humankind, and midwives, doctors and social workers from a maternity hospital. Data were inductively thematically analysed, and themes were then deductively categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand behavioural influences and facilitators and barriers to implementing and sustaining the doula service within a hospital setting.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Facilitators to implementation of the doula service included: collaborative relationships; having sound knowledge of referral processes; and being a valued professional doula service with dedicated volunteers. Barriers to implementation included: limited knowledge of the doula service from hospital staff; difficulty in retaining volunteer doulas; being a small non-profit doula service; and limited capacity of hospitals to financially support the doula service. Advocacy for renumerating doulas may be one means to strengthen and sustain existing doula-provider service relationships.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Consideration of establishing strategic partnerships between the doula service and hospitals may create financially-sustainable pathways to enable provision of high-quality, community-based doula support for women and gender diverse birthing people to continue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Community-based doula support for women and gender-diverse birthing people has a range of benefits in improving maternal outcomes and experiences. However, there is limited research on how doula services operate in Australia. Birth for Humankind is an Australian community-based volunteer doula service, which provides free doula support for women and gender diverse birthing people experiencing social discrimination and financial disadvantage. The aim of this study was to understand facilitators and barriers to implementation and sustainability of a community-based doula service delivered to clients concurrently receiving care at a major maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study consisting of 30 in-depth interviews with doulas and managers of the community-based doula service Birth for Humankind, and midwives, doctors and social workers from a maternity hospital. Data were inductively thematically analysed, and themes were then deductively categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand behavioural influences and facilitators and barriers to implementing and sustaining the doula service within a hospital setting.

Results

Facilitators to implementation of the doula service included: collaborative relationships; having sound knowledge of referral processes; and being a valued professional doula service with dedicated volunteers. Barriers to implementation included: limited knowledge of the doula service from hospital staff; difficulty in retaining volunteer doulas; being a small non-profit doula service; and limited capacity of hospitals to financially support the doula service. Advocacy for renumerating doulas may be one means to strengthen and sustain existing doula-provider service relationships.

Conclusion

Consideration of establishing strategic partnerships between the doula service and hospitals may create financially-sustainable pathways to enable provision of high-quality, community-based doula support for women and gender diverse birthing people to continue.
影响澳大利亚社区朵拉服务的实施和可持续性的因素:定性研究
背景基于社区的朵拉为妇女和不同性别的分娩者提供支持,这对改善产妇的预后和经历有一系列益处。然而,有关澳大利亚朵拉服务如何运作的研究却很有限。为人类而生"(Birth for Humankind)是一项基于澳大利亚社区的志愿朵拉服务,为遭受社会歧视和经济困难的妇女和性别多样化的分娩者提供免费的朵拉支持。本研究的目的是了解在澳大利亚墨尔本一家大型妇产医院同时为接受护理的客户提供社区朵拉服务的促进因素和障碍,以及该服务的实施和可持续性。我们对数据进行了归纳式主题分析,然后使用能力、机会和动机(COM-B)模型和理论领域框架(TDF)对主题进行了演绎式分类,以了解在医院环境中实施和维持朵拉服务的行为影响因素、促进因素和障碍。结果实施朵拉服务的促进因素包括:合作关系;对转诊流程有充分的了解;朵拉服务是一项有价值的专业服务,有热心的志愿者。实施的障碍包括:医院员工对朵拉服务的了解有限;难以留住志愿朵拉;朵拉服务是一项小型的非营利性服务;医院在财政上支持朵拉服务的能力有限。结论考虑在朵拉服务和医院之间建立战略伙伴关系可能会创建财政上可持续的途径,从而使为妇女和不同性别的分娩者提供高质量的、基于社区的朵拉支持得以继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信