Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zainab Ahmad Ramadan (Zainab A. Ramadan), Amel Helmy Elmorsy (Amel Helmy), Saher Ebrahim Taman (Saher Taman), Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar (FA Denewar)
{"title":"Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography","authors":"Zainab Ahmad Ramadan (Zainab A. Ramadan),&nbsp;Amel Helmy Elmorsy (Amel Helmy),&nbsp;Saher Ebrahim Taman (Saher Taman),&nbsp;Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar (FA Denewar)","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess inter-observer &amp; intra-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology (ACR) bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography (CT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 273 bone tumors 184 (67.4 %) benign and 89 (32.6 %) malignant. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the CT images to assess the defined CT features of bone lesions and assign a bone-RADS category. A third observer reviewed the CT images twice with one month interval and reported the specified CT features and final bone-RADS category for bone lesions. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone-RADS were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was almost perfect inter-observer agreement between the two reviewers for all defined variables as well as bone-RADS categories (Kappa = 92.2 %). Overall intra-observer agreement was also perfect for all defined CT features and bone RADS categories with higher percentage than inter-observer one (κ = 98.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bone-RADS is an effective clinical tool for practicing radiologists in the risk assessment and management of bone tumors with perfect agreement among observers. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted for assessing reliability or validity of the recent ACR Bone-RADS using CT. Hence, this study could serve as a cornerstone for further upcoming studies to assess the reproducibility and validity of the ACR Bone-RADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 110367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess inter-observer & intra-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology (ACR) bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This retrospective study included 273 bone tumors 184 (67.4 %) benign and 89 (32.6 %) malignant. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the CT images to assess the defined CT features of bone lesions and assign a bone-RADS category. A third observer reviewed the CT images twice with one month interval and reported the specified CT features and final bone-RADS category for bone lesions. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone-RADS were analyzed.

Results

There was almost perfect inter-observer agreement between the two reviewers for all defined variables as well as bone-RADS categories (Kappa = 92.2 %). Overall intra-observer agreement was also perfect for all defined CT features and bone RADS categories with higher percentage than inter-observer one (κ = 98.3 %).

Conclusion

Bone-RADS is an effective clinical tool for practicing radiologists in the risk assessment and management of bone tumors with perfect agreement among observers. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted for assessing reliability or validity of the recent ACR Bone-RADS using CT. Hence, this study could serve as a cornerstone for further upcoming studies to assess the reproducibility and validity of the ACR Bone-RADS.
骨报告和数据系统(Bone-RADS)在解读计算机断层扫描骨肿瘤方面的观察者间和观察者内一致性
目的评估美国放射学会(ACR)骨报告和数据系统(Bone-RADS)在解读计算机断层扫描(CT)骨肿瘤时观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性。两名双盲放射科医生独立审阅 CT 图像,评估骨病变的 CT 定义特征并划分骨-RADS 类别。第三位观察者两次审查 CT 图像,每次间隔一个月,并报告指定的 CT 特征和骨病变的最终骨-RADS 类别。分析了骨-RADS的观察者间和观察者内的一致性。结果在所有定义的变量和骨-RADS类别上,两位审查者的观察者间一致性几乎完美(Kappa = 92.2 %)。结论骨RADS是放射科医生进行骨肿瘤风险评估和管理的有效临床工具,观察者之间完全一致。据我们所知,目前还没有研究使用 CT 评估最新 ACR 骨-RADS 的可靠性或有效性。因此,本研究可作为评估 ACR 骨-RADS 可重复性和有效性的进一步研究的基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信