In-situ and modelled debris thickness distribution on Panchi Nala Glacier (western Himalaya, India) and its impact on glacier state

IF 2.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Purushottam Kumar Garg , Mohd Farooq Azam , Iram Ali , Aparna Shukla , Arindan Mandal , Himanshu Kaushik
{"title":"In-situ and modelled debris thickness distribution on Panchi Nala Glacier (western Himalaya, India) and its impact on glacier state","authors":"Purushottam Kumar Garg ,&nbsp;Mohd Farooq Azam ,&nbsp;Iram Ali ,&nbsp;Aparna Shukla ,&nbsp;Arindan Mandal ,&nbsp;Himanshu Kaushik","doi":"10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents extensive in-situ debris thickness measurements over the Panchi Nala Glacier (western Himalaya, India) and models its spatial distribution using remote sensing and ERA-5 reanalysis data. A rigorous comparison of in-situ and modelled debris thickness and a systematic assessment of its influence on glacier state (2000–2019) are also made. In-situ measurements reveal debris thickness ranging from 0 to 70 ± 0.25 cm. Modelled debris thickness ranges from 0 to 64 ± 1.75 cm. Debris thickness pattern is such that it increases from centre to margins and snout to upglacier. In-situ and modelled debris thickness show a good positive correlation (r = 0.73; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Further, the glacier-wide mass balance is −0.51 ± 0.09 m w.e./y. Modelled debris thickness showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.66; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) with surface lowering, indicating reduced melt under thick debris. These moderate-to-good correlations in both cases can be ascribed to the inability of coarse resolution data to capture small supraglacial feature variations. Also, thicker debris over margins probably protected it, manifested through limited area loss (0.13 ± 0.2%/y) and snout retreat (5.9 ± 1.6 m/y). Results show higher thinning over the upper ablation zone (4725–4925 m asl) compared to the lower ablation zone (4546–4725 m asl), likely induced by typical debris distribution, has reduced the glacier-tongue's slope (6.7°). Gentle glacier-tongue in a negative mass balance regime with growing debris (0.3 ± 0.2%/y) has become conducive to supraglacial ponds and ice cliffs development, which now dominate ablation processes. Overall, the study presents crucial data on debris thickness and provides vital insights into glacier evolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34142,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Advances","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033424000923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents extensive in-situ debris thickness measurements over the Panchi Nala Glacier (western Himalaya, India) and models its spatial distribution using remote sensing and ERA-5 reanalysis data. A rigorous comparison of in-situ and modelled debris thickness and a systematic assessment of its influence on glacier state (2000–2019) are also made. In-situ measurements reveal debris thickness ranging from 0 to 70 ± 0.25 cm. Modelled debris thickness ranges from 0 to 64 ± 1.75 cm. Debris thickness pattern is such that it increases from centre to margins and snout to upglacier. In-situ and modelled debris thickness show a good positive correlation (r = 0.73; p < 0.05). Further, the glacier-wide mass balance is −0.51 ± 0.09 m w.e./y. Modelled debris thickness showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.66; p < 0.05) with surface lowering, indicating reduced melt under thick debris. These moderate-to-good correlations in both cases can be ascribed to the inability of coarse resolution data to capture small supraglacial feature variations. Also, thicker debris over margins probably protected it, manifested through limited area loss (0.13 ± 0.2%/y) and snout retreat (5.9 ± 1.6 m/y). Results show higher thinning over the upper ablation zone (4725–4925 m asl) compared to the lower ablation zone (4546–4725 m asl), likely induced by typical debris distribution, has reduced the glacier-tongue's slope (6.7°). Gentle glacier-tongue in a negative mass balance regime with growing debris (0.3 ± 0.2%/y) has become conducive to supraglacial ponds and ice cliffs development, which now dominate ablation processes. Overall, the study presents crucial data on debris thickness and provides vital insights into glacier evolution.
潘奇纳拉冰川(印度喜马拉雅山西部)的原地和模型碎屑厚度分布及其对冰川状态的影响
本研究利用遥感和ERA-5再分析数据,对潘奇纳拉冰川(印度喜马拉雅山西部)的碎屑厚度进行了广泛的实地测量,并对其空间分布进行了建模。此外,还对原位碎片厚度和建模碎片厚度进行了严格比较,并系统评估了碎片厚度对冰川状态(2000-2019 年)的影响。原位测量显示碎屑厚度范围为 0 至 70 ± 0.25 厘米。模拟的碎屑厚度范围为 0 至 64 ± 1.75 厘米。碎屑厚度的变化规律是,从冰川中心到边缘,从冰川鼻端到上冰川,碎屑厚度不断增加。原位和模拟的碎屑厚度显示出良好的正相关性(r = 0.73; p < 0.05)。此外,整个冰川的质量平衡为-0.51 ± 0.09 m w.e./y。模拟的碎屑厚度与地表下降呈中度正相关(r = 0.66; p <0.05),表明厚碎屑下的融化减少。这两种情况下的中度到良好相关性可归因于粗分辨率数据无法捕捉到微小的上冰川特征变化。此外,边缘较厚的碎屑可能对其起到了保护作用,表现为有限的面积损失(0.13 ± 0.2%/年)和鼻端后退(5.9 ± 1.6 米/年)。结果表明,上消融带(海拔 4725-4925 米)比下消融带(海拔 4546-4725 米)的消融程度更高,这可能是由于典型的碎屑分布造成的,从而降低了冰川舌的坡度(6.7°)。由于碎屑不断增加(0.3 ± 0.2%/年),处于负质量平衡状态的温和冰川舌有利于超冰川池塘和冰崖的形成,而这两种现象目前在消融过程中占主导地位。总之,该研究提供了有关碎屑厚度的重要数据,并为冰川演变提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Advances
Quaternary Science Advances Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信