Investigation on shock wave mitigation performance and crashworthiness of density gradient foam structures

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Yaru Gao , Wenlong Xu , Cheng Wang , Fangfang Qi , Shengpeng Xue
{"title":"Investigation on shock wave mitigation performance and crashworthiness of density gradient foam structures","authors":"Yaru Gao ,&nbsp;Wenlong Xu ,&nbsp;Cheng Wang ,&nbsp;Fangfang Qi ,&nbsp;Shengpeng Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, hazardous chemical explosions have occurred frequently, and explosion shock wave and crash injuries are the main causes of death. Existing studies mostly focus on single injury factors and lack systematic protection studies for shock wave and crash. In this study, a density gradient foam structure (DGFS) was designed and evaluated to provide comprehensive protection against shock wave and crash injuries. The mechanical properties of different density foams were investigated through quasi-static tests and Hopkinson experiments. Shock wave mitigation and crash experiments were conducted using the Multi-purpose Shock Cannon (MSC) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) techniques, and the baseline shock wave pressure was modeled for three different shockwave pressures. The results show that under quasi-static conditions, both yield stress and failure stress increase with increasing sample density. Under high strain rate conditions, both the peak linear elastic stress and maximum strain of the specimen tended to increase with increasing sample density. The single gradient- drop DGFS was the most effective in shock wave protection, and the specific pressure mitigation ratio was increased by more than 50% compared to the no-gradient DGFS. the double gradient-first-up-then-drop DGFS has a significant advantage in impact energy dissipation at low and medium impact velocities, with a maximum increase of 47.71% in peak crash force attenuation rate and 40.95% in specific energy absorption compared to other DGFS. The single gradient-drop DGFS have the better crash force efficiency, and the performance enhancement can be up to 49.00% compared with other DGFS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 105187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24003129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, hazardous chemical explosions have occurred frequently, and explosion shock wave and crash injuries are the main causes of death. Existing studies mostly focus on single injury factors and lack systematic protection studies for shock wave and crash. In this study, a density gradient foam structure (DGFS) was designed and evaluated to provide comprehensive protection against shock wave and crash injuries. The mechanical properties of different density foams were investigated through quasi-static tests and Hopkinson experiments. Shock wave mitigation and crash experiments were conducted using the Multi-purpose Shock Cannon (MSC) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) techniques, and the baseline shock wave pressure was modeled for three different shockwave pressures. The results show that under quasi-static conditions, both yield stress and failure stress increase with increasing sample density. Under high strain rate conditions, both the peak linear elastic stress and maximum strain of the specimen tended to increase with increasing sample density. The single gradient- drop DGFS was the most effective in shock wave protection, and the specific pressure mitigation ratio was increased by more than 50% compared to the no-gradient DGFS. the double gradient-first-up-then-drop DGFS has a significant advantage in impact energy dissipation at low and medium impact velocities, with a maximum increase of 47.71% in peak crash force attenuation rate and 40.95% in specific energy absorption compared to other DGFS. The single gradient-drop DGFS have the better crash force efficiency, and the performance enhancement can be up to 49.00% compared with other DGFS.
密度梯度泡沫结构的冲击波减缓性能和耐撞性研究
近年来,危险化学品爆炸事件频发,爆炸冲击波和碰撞伤害是导致死亡的主要原因。现有研究多集中于单一伤害因素,缺乏对冲击波和碰撞的系统保护研究。本研究设计并评估了一种密度梯度泡沫结构(DGFS),以提供针对冲击波和碰撞伤害的全面保护。通过准静态测试和霍普金森实验研究了不同密度泡沫的机械性能。使用多用途冲击炮(MSC)和数字图像相关(DIC)技术进行了冲击波缓解和碰撞实验,并针对三种不同的冲击波压力建立了基线冲击波压力模型。结果表明,在准静态条件下,屈服应力和破坏应力都随着样品密度的增加而增加。在高应变率条件下,试样的线性弹性应力峰值和最大应变都随着试样密度的增加而增加。与无梯度 DGFS 相比,先上后下的双梯度 DGFS 在中低冲击速度下的冲击能量耗散方面具有显著优势,碰撞力峰值衰减率最大提高了 47.71%,比能量吸收率最大提高了 40.95%。单梯度下降 DGFS 具有更好的碰撞力效率,与其他 DGFS 相比,性能提升可达 49.00%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信