Safety and efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Zhao Peng, Duo Li, Na Wu, Xiao-Yuan Wang, Gai-Xia Sun, Hui-Bin Gao, Hai-Xia Li
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Zhao Peng,&nbsp;Duo Li,&nbsp;Na Wu,&nbsp;Xiao-Yuan Wang,&nbsp;Gai-Xia Sun,&nbsp;Hui-Bin Gao,&nbsp;Hai-Xia Li","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess the methodological quality of the published studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight randomized controlled trials involving 482 patients were included. Seven studies reported clinical remission, and three reported endoscopic remission. Compared to the placebo group, adjunctive curcumin therapy significantly improved clinical remission (RR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 4.34; <em>P</em> = 0.008; I²=80 %). Although endoscopic remission showed an increasing trend, it was not statistically significant (RR=4.17, 95 % CI: 0.63 to 27.71; <em>P</em> = 0.14; I²=80 %). Significant improvements were also observed in clinical improvement (RR=1.93, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 3.36; <em>P</em> = 0.02; I²=56 %) and endoscopic improvement (RR=1.76, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.77; <em>P</em> = 0.01; I²=62 %) in the curcumin group. No serious adverse events were reported. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive correlation between treatment efficacy and dosage, with no significant impact of administration method or follow-up duration on the pooled results or heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Curcumin as an adjunctive treatment shows promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in UC patients without significant adverse effects. However, due to the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":"21 1","pages":"Article 103083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess the methodological quality of the published studies.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials involving 482 patients were included. Seven studies reported clinical remission, and three reported endoscopic remission. Compared to the placebo group, adjunctive curcumin therapy significantly improved clinical remission (RR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 4.34; P = 0.008; I²=80 %). Although endoscopic remission showed an increasing trend, it was not statistically significant (RR=4.17, 95 % CI: 0.63 to 27.71; P = 0.14; I²=80 %). Significant improvements were also observed in clinical improvement (RR=1.93, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 3.36; P = 0.02; I²=56 %) and endoscopic improvement (RR=1.76, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.77; P = 0.01; I²=62 %) in the curcumin group. No serious adverse events were reported. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive correlation between treatment efficacy and dosage, with no significant impact of administration method or follow-up duration on the pooled results or heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Curcumin as an adjunctive treatment shows promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in UC patients without significant adverse effects. However, due to the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
姜黄素治疗溃疡性结肠炎的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的最新系统综述和荟萃分析
目的本研究旨在系统评估姜黄素作为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者辅助治疗的安全性和有效性,并评估已发表研究的方法学质量。方法在PubMed、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中对截至2023年8月18日发表的随机对照试验进行了全面检索。两名独立审稿人根据预先确定的标准对研究进行了筛选。使用RevMan 5.4的随机效应模型进行了元分析。结果共纳入 8 项随机对照试验,涉及 482 名患者。七项研究报告了临床缓解,三项报告了内镜缓解。与安慰剂组相比,姜黄素辅助疗法显著改善了临床缓解(RR=2.33,95 % CI:1.25 至 4.34;P=0.008;I²=80 %)。虽然内镜缓解率呈上升趋势,但无统计学意义(RR=4.17,95 % CI:0.63 至 27.71;P = 0.14;I²=80 %)。姜黄素组在临床改善(RR=1.93,95 % CI:1.10 至 3.36;P = 0.02;I²=56 %)和内镜改善(RR=1.76,95 % CI:1.12 至 2.77;P = 0.01;I²=62 %)方面也有显著改善。无严重不良事件报告。亚组分析表明,疗效与剂量呈正相关,给药方法或随访时间对汇总结果或异质性无显著影响。然而,由于研究数量有限且存在严重的异质性,有必要进一步开展大规模随机对照试验来证实这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
179
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信