Autoclaved aerated concrete in reinforced building applications: A systematic review of AAC/RAAC in the last 40+ years

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ali M. Saad, Chris Gorse, Chris Ian Goodier, Karen Blay, Sergio Cavalaro
{"title":"Autoclaved aerated concrete in reinforced building applications: A systematic review of AAC/RAAC in the last 40+ years","authors":"Ali M. Saad,&nbsp;Chris Gorse,&nbsp;Chris Ian Goodier,&nbsp;Karen Blay,&nbsp;Sergio Cavalaro","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>UK industry has recently highlighted concerns relating to the structural safety of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in existing structures, together with a small number of collapses without warning. A broad body of scholarly academic research already exists on AAC in Building Structures, though much less on RAAC. Against the fact that extant research is primarily industry-led, there is a lack of a systematic critical review of the body of academic literature available. To achieve this, the paper systematically reviews 92 academic papers filtered from over 480 published studies on AAC/RAAC, each included after applying an exclusion criterion, from 1980 to 2024. The review identifies four drivers for AAC applications in building structures, namely AAC being: 1) a lightweight material, useful in reducing load transfers, 2) an insulating material, against fire, temperature, and sounds, 3) a sustainable material, of a recyclable nature with relatively low carbon emissions, and 4) an economical material because of its composition and ease of use and application. Moreover, it also identifies the popular areas of AAC application within buildings, the processes involved in its production, the material's behaviour and characteristics, the types of reinforcement, and the modes of AAC failure. Such a review of knowledge from the last 40 years will help scholars identify the understudied research gaps and several untapped research areas that are included in the proposed research agenda.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 103431"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024016839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UK industry has recently highlighted concerns relating to the structural safety of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in existing structures, together with a small number of collapses without warning. A broad body of scholarly academic research already exists on AAC in Building Structures, though much less on RAAC. Against the fact that extant research is primarily industry-led, there is a lack of a systematic critical review of the body of academic literature available. To achieve this, the paper systematically reviews 92 academic papers filtered from over 480 published studies on AAC/RAAC, each included after applying an exclusion criterion, from 1980 to 2024. The review identifies four drivers for AAC applications in building structures, namely AAC being: 1) a lightweight material, useful in reducing load transfers, 2) an insulating material, against fire, temperature, and sounds, 3) a sustainable material, of a recyclable nature with relatively low carbon emissions, and 4) an economical material because of its composition and ease of use and application. Moreover, it also identifies the popular areas of AAC application within buildings, the processes involved in its production, the material's behaviour and characteristics, the types of reinforcement, and the modes of AAC failure. Such a review of knowledge from the last 40 years will help scholars identify the understudied research gaps and several untapped research areas that are included in the proposed research agenda.
蒸压加气混凝土在加固建筑中的应用:对过去 40 多年来 AAC/RAAC 的系统回顾
最近,英国工业界对现有结构中的加筋蒸压加气混凝土(RAAC)的结构安全以及少量无预警倒塌事件表示担忧。关于建筑结构中的蒸压加气混凝土已有大量学术研究,但关于 RAAC 的研究要少得多。由于现有研究主要由行业主导,因此缺乏对现有学术文献进行系统的批判性审查。为此,本文系统回顾了从 1980 年至 2024 年期间发表的 480 多篇有关 AAC/RAAC 的研究中筛选出的 92 篇学术论文,每篇论文都采用了排除标准。该综述确定了建筑结构中应用 AAC 的四个驱动因素,即 AAC 是:1)一种轻质材料,可有效减少荷载传递;2)一种隔热材料,可防火、隔温、隔音;3)一种可持续材料,可回收利用,碳排放量相对较低;4)一种经济型材料,因为其成分易于使用和应用。此外,它还确定了建筑中室内空调的热门应用领域、其生产过程、材料的行为和特性、加固类型以及室内空调的失效模式。对过去 40 年知识的回顾将有助于学者们找出研究不足的空白点和几个尚未开发的研究领域,这些都已纳入拟议的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信