Bleaching efficacy of in-office bleaching with violet light using low-concentration hydrogen peroxide nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel: a randomized controlled trial.

Gustavo Garcia Castro, Palena Araújo Pinto, Michael Willian Favoreto, Alessandra Reis, Maria Viviana-Mora, Rita de Cássia Mendonça de Miranda, Andres Felipe Milan Cardenas, Alessandro D Loguercio, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez
{"title":"Bleaching efficacy of in-office bleaching with violet light using low-concentration hydrogen peroxide nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Gustavo Garcia Castro, Palena Araújo Pinto, Michael Willian Favoreto, Alessandra Reis, Maria Viviana-Mora, Rita de Cássia Mendonça de Miranda, Andres Felipe Milan Cardenas, Alessandro D Loguercio, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the bleaching efficacy and tooth sensitivity (TS) of participants submitted to different application protocols of in-office bleaching with violet light using 6% hydrogen peroxide (HP) nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-six participants were randomized and bleached using either a 6% HP (Nano White, DMC), and/or violet light (Bright Max Whitening, MMOptics), according to the following protocols: 1) only violet light (VIOL); 2) only bleaching gel application (BG) and; 3) combined bleaching gel application + violet light (BG+VIOL). The bleaching efficacy was evaluated with the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales. The risk and intensity of TS were recorded using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 0-4 numerical scale (NRS). Color change and intensity of TS values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used. The absolute risk of TS was compared using the Chi-square test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant and higher degree of bleaching was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups compared to the VIOL group (p < 0.003). Despite no significant differences in the risk (p > 0.07) and intensity (p > 0.28) of TS among groups, a higher risk of TS was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using VIOL reduced the risk of TS but did not improve bleaching. However, BG+VIOL with low-concentration HP nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel achieved equal efficacy and was less likely to cause TS compared to BG.</p>","PeriodicalId":94170,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","volume":" ","pages":"104410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the bleaching efficacy and tooth sensitivity (TS) of participants submitted to different application protocols of in-office bleaching with violet light using 6% hydrogen peroxide (HP) nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel.

Materials and methods: Sixty-six participants were randomized and bleached using either a 6% HP (Nano White, DMC), and/or violet light (Bright Max Whitening, MMOptics), according to the following protocols: 1) only violet light (VIOL); 2) only bleaching gel application (BG) and; 3) combined bleaching gel application + violet light (BG+VIOL). The bleaching efficacy was evaluated with the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales. The risk and intensity of TS were recorded using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 0-4 numerical scale (NRS). Color change and intensity of TS values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used. The absolute risk of TS was compared using the Chi-square test (α = 0.05).

Results: A significant and higher degree of bleaching was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups compared to the VIOL group (p < 0.003). Despite no significant differences in the risk (p > 0.07) and intensity (p > 0.28) of TS among groups, a higher risk of TS was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups.

Conclusions: Using VIOL reduced the risk of TS but did not improve bleaching. However, BG+VIOL with low-concentration HP nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel achieved equal efficacy and was less likely to cause TS compared to BG.

使用低浓度过氧化氢纳米颗粒光触媒凝胶的紫光漂白疗效:随机对照试验。
研究目的本随机对照试验旨在评估使用6%过氧化氢(HP)纳米微粒光触媒凝胶的不同诊室漂白方案的参与者的漂白效果和牙齿敏感性(TS):66名参与者被随机分配,按照以下方案使用6%过氧化氢(Nano White,DMC)和/或紫外线(Bright Max Whitening,MMOptics)进行漂白:1)只使用紫外线(VIOL);2)只使用漂白凝胶(BG);3)联合使用漂白凝胶+紫外线(BG+VIOL)。漂白效果采用伟特 Easyshade 分光光度计、伟特经典和伟特漂白指南量表进行评估。TS 的风险和强度采用 0-10 视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 0-4 数字量表(NRS)进行记录。颜色变化和 TS 强度值的比较采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey's 检验。采用卡方检验(α = 0.05)比较 TS 的绝对风险:结果:与 VIOL 组相比,BG 组和 BG+VIOL 组的白化程度明显更高(p < 0.003)。尽管各组间的 TS 风险(p > 0.07)和强度(p > 0.28)无明显差异,但 BG 组和 BG+VIOL 组的 TS 风险更高:结论:使用 VIOL 可降低 TS 风险,但不能改善漂白效果。然而,与 BG 相比,BG+VIOL 与低浓度 HP 纳米颗粒光触媒凝胶达到了相同的效果,且引起 TS 的可能性更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信