Psychometric Validation and Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire in Adults with Bronchiectasis.
{"title":"Psychometric Validation and Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire in Adults with Bronchiectasis.","authors":"Jin-Fu Xu, Surinder S Birring, Yuan-Yuan Li, Ming-Xin Shi, Hai-Wen Lu, Shu-Yi Gu, Jie-Ming Qu, Yong-Hua Gao, Wei-Jie Guan, Nan-Shan Zhong","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-751OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a concise, self-administered, and disease-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in bronchiectasis. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to investigate the psychometric properties of a simplified Mandarin BHQ and determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as a reliable clinical endpoint for assessing the efficacy of bronchiectasis treatments. <b>Methods:</b> A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial cohort of 357 patients treated with tobramycin inhalation solution or saline inhalation for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> infection and a cross-sectional observational cohort of 436 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed. Psychometric analyses encompassed convergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were utilized to calculate the MCID for therapeutic response. <b>Results:</b> There were significant positive correlations between scores on the BHQ and those on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale, with correlation coefficients of 0.698 in the trial cohort and 0.567 in the clinical cohort (both <i>P</i>s < 0.0001). Known-groups validity indicated significant differences in BHQ scores stratified by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index. BHQ scores correlated modestly with both forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted and exacerbation frequency within the previous year. In the trial cohort, the BHQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.893) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.853). An 8-point improvement in scores on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale corresponded to a mean increase of 5.49 points in BHQ scores after 4-week treatment. The MCID for BHQ was consistently 3 points. <b>Conclusions:</b> The BHQ (MCID: 3 points) represents a clinically meaningful tool for evaluating therapeutic intervention outcomes and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"506-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-751OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a concise, self-administered, and disease-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in bronchiectasis. Objectives: We sought to investigate the psychometric properties of a simplified Mandarin BHQ and determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as a reliable clinical endpoint for assessing the efficacy of bronchiectasis treatments. Methods: A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial cohort of 357 patients treated with tobramycin inhalation solution or saline inhalation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and a cross-sectional observational cohort of 436 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed. Psychometric analyses encompassed convergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were utilized to calculate the MCID for therapeutic response. Results: There were significant positive correlations between scores on the BHQ and those on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale, with correlation coefficients of 0.698 in the trial cohort and 0.567 in the clinical cohort (both Ps < 0.0001). Known-groups validity indicated significant differences in BHQ scores stratified by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index. BHQ scores correlated modestly with both forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted and exacerbation frequency within the previous year. In the trial cohort, the BHQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.893) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.853). An 8-point improvement in scores on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale corresponded to a mean increase of 5.49 points in BHQ scores after 4-week treatment. The MCID for BHQ was consistently 3 points. Conclusions: The BHQ (MCID: 3 points) represents a clinically meaningful tool for evaluating therapeutic intervention outcomes and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.