Psychometric Validation and Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire in Adults with Bronchiectasis.

Jin-Fu Xu, Surinder S Birring, Yuan-Yuan Li, Ming-Xin Shi, Hai-Wen Lu, Shuyi Gu, Jie-Ming Qu, Yong-Hua Gao, Wei-Jie Guan, Nan-Shan Zhong
{"title":"Psychometric Validation and Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire in Adults with Bronchiectasis.","authors":"Jin-Fu Xu, Surinder S Birring, Yuan-Yuan Li, Ming-Xin Shi, Hai-Wen Lu, Shuyi Gu, Jie-Ming Qu, Yong-Hua Gao, Wei-Jie Guan, Nan-Shan Zhong","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-751OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a concise, self-administered and disease-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the psychometric properties of simplified Mandarin BHQ and determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as a reliable clinical endpoint for assessing the efficacy of bronchiectasis treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial cohort of 357 patients treated with tobramycin inhalation solution or saline inhalation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, along with a cross-sectional observational cohort including 436 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed. Psychometric analyses encompassed convergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were utilized to calculate the MCID for therapeutic response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant positive correlations between BHQ scores and the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale (QoL-B-RSS), with correlation coefficient 0.698 in the trial cohort and 0.567 in the clinical cohort (both P<0.0001). Known-groups validity indicated significant differences in BHQ scores stratified by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index. BHQ scores correlated modestly with both FEV1% predicted and exacerbation frequency within the previous year. In the trial cohort, BHQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.893) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.853). An 8-point improvement in QoL-B-RSS corresponded to a mean increase of 5.49 points in BHQ scores after 4-week treatment. The MCID for BHQ was consistently 3 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BHQ (MCID: 3 points) represents a clinically meaningful tool for evaluating therapeutic intervention outcomes and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-751OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a concise, self-administered and disease-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in bronchiectasis.

Objectives: To investigate the psychometric properties of simplified Mandarin BHQ and determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as a reliable clinical endpoint for assessing the efficacy of bronchiectasis treatments.

Methods: A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial cohort of 357 patients treated with tobramycin inhalation solution or saline inhalation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, along with a cross-sectional observational cohort including 436 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed. Psychometric analyses encompassed convergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were utilized to calculate the MCID for therapeutic response.

Results: There were significant positive correlations between BHQ scores and the Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale (QoL-B-RSS), with correlation coefficient 0.698 in the trial cohort and 0.567 in the clinical cohort (both P<0.0001). Known-groups validity indicated significant differences in BHQ scores stratified by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index. BHQ scores correlated modestly with both FEV1% predicted and exacerbation frequency within the previous year. In the trial cohort, BHQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.893) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.853). An 8-point improvement in QoL-B-RSS corresponded to a mean increase of 5.49 points in BHQ scores after 4-week treatment. The MCID for BHQ was consistently 3 points.

Conclusions: The BHQ (MCID: 3 points) represents a clinically meaningful tool for evaluating therapeutic intervention outcomes and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.

成人支气管扩张症患者支气管扩张症健康问卷的心理计量学验证和最小临床意义差异的确定。
理论依据:支气管扩张症健康问卷(BHQ)是一种简明、自我管理且针对特定疾病的工具,用于测量支气管扩张症患者与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL):研究简化普通话 BHQ 的心理测量学特性,并确定最小临床重要差异(MCID)作为评估支气管扩张症疗效的可靠临床终点:方法: 对357名接受妥布霉素吸入溶液或生理盐水吸入治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染的患者组成的纵向随机对照试验队列,以及436名支气管扩张症患者组成的横断面观察队列进行了分析。心理测量分析包括收敛有效性、已知组有效性、内部一致性、重复测试可靠性和响应性。采用基于锚的方法和基于分布的方法计算治疗反应的 MCID:结果:BHQ评分与生活质量-支气管扩张症呼吸道症状量表(QoL-B-RSS)之间存在明显的正相关,试验队列中的相关系数为0.698,临床队列中的相关系数为0.567(均为PC结论):BHQ(MCID:3 分)是一种具有临床意义的工具,可用于评估支气管扩张症患者的治疗干预效果和以患者为中心的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信