Clinical decision making and moral distress among intensive care units nurses in Iran.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arefeh Arash, GHolamreza Mahmoodi-Shan, Fatemeh Mehravar, Zahra Sabzi, Hamideh Mancheri
{"title":"Clinical decision making and moral distress among intensive care units nurses in Iran.","authors":"Arefeh Arash, GHolamreza Mahmoodi-Shan, Fatemeh Mehravar, Zahra Sabzi, Hamideh Mancheri","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02197-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care units are often presented as environments where ethical issues are common and decisions can determine the life or death of patients, and these units have unique challenges due to critical health care. In these units, the relationship between the medical team and the patient's relatives, their refusal of treatment, informed consent causes the nurses to have conflict in their decision making, therefore, this study aims to determine the level of clinical decision-making and moral distress and the relationship between them in intensive care units nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted with a descriptive-analytical approach in 2023 in Gorgan city. The number of 198 nurses in the intensive care units of Gonbad Kavos hospitals in the north of Iran were investigated and evaluated using the Corley Moral Distress questionnaire (2002), and Laurie's Clinical Decision questionnaire (2001) in 2023. Independent T-test and anova analysis of variance were used for bivariate analysis. The significance level in this study was considered 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study showed that the mean and standard deviation of clinical decision making was 60.98 ± 10.25 (analytical-systematic level) and moral distress was 92.2 ± 23.61 (moderate level). There was a statistically significant relationship between clinical decision-making and nurses' moral distress (P < 0.001 and r = 0.370). The moral distress score had a statistically significant relationship with marriage, employment status, education level, age, work experience and duration of employment in the special department. Also, the clinical decision score had a statistically significant relationship with employment status, education level, age and work experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to these results, it seems that more attention should be paid to the moral distress of nurses in intensive care units, and it is necessary to improve their decision-making towards intuitive interpretation, which is done by designing and compiling training programs and workshops for nurses can be done, so that we can provide optimal nursing services to the patients of this department.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02197-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care units are often presented as environments where ethical issues are common and decisions can determine the life or death of patients, and these units have unique challenges due to critical health care. In these units, the relationship between the medical team and the patient's relatives, their refusal of treatment, informed consent causes the nurses to have conflict in their decision making, therefore, this study aims to determine the level of clinical decision-making and moral distress and the relationship between them in intensive care units nurses.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with a descriptive-analytical approach in 2023 in Gorgan city. The number of 198 nurses in the intensive care units of Gonbad Kavos hospitals in the north of Iran were investigated and evaluated using the Corley Moral Distress questionnaire (2002), and Laurie's Clinical Decision questionnaire (2001) in 2023. Independent T-test and anova analysis of variance were used for bivariate analysis. The significance level in this study was considered 0.05.

Results: The results of the study showed that the mean and standard deviation of clinical decision making was 60.98 ± 10.25 (analytical-systematic level) and moral distress was 92.2 ± 23.61 (moderate level). There was a statistically significant relationship between clinical decision-making and nurses' moral distress (P < 0.001 and r = 0.370). The moral distress score had a statistically significant relationship with marriage, employment status, education level, age, work experience and duration of employment in the special department. Also, the clinical decision score had a statistically significant relationship with employment status, education level, age and work experience.

Conclusion: According to these results, it seems that more attention should be paid to the moral distress of nurses in intensive care units, and it is necessary to improve their decision-making towards intuitive interpretation, which is done by designing and compiling training programs and workshops for nurses can be done, so that we can provide optimal nursing services to the patients of this department.

伊朗重症监护室护士的临床决策和道德困扰。
背景:重症监护病房往往是伦理问题频发的环境,所做的决定可能决定患者的生死,这些病房因危重病人的医疗护理而面临独特的挑战。在这些病房中,医疗团队与患者亲属之间的关系、患者亲属对治疗的拒绝、知情同意导致护士在决策过程中产生冲突,因此,本研究旨在确定重症监护病房护士的临床决策水平和道德困扰以及两者之间的关系:这项横断面研究于 2023 年在戈尔甘市进行,采用描述性分析方法。使用 Corley 道德压力问卷(2002 年)和 Laurie 临床决策问卷(2001 年)对伊朗北部 Gonbad Kavos 医院重症监护室的 198 名护士进行了调查和评估。双变量分析采用独立 T 检验和 anova 方差分析。本研究的显著性水平为 0.05:研究结果显示,临床决策的平均值和标准差为 60.98 ± 10.25(分析-系统水平),道德困扰为 92.2 ± 23.61(中等水平)。临床决策与护士道德困扰之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(P 结论:临床决策与护士道德困扰之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(P 结论:临床决策与护士道德困扰之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(P 结论):根据这些结果,似乎应更多地关注重症监护病房护士的道德困扰,有必要改善其决策,使其向直观解释的方向发展,这可以通过设计和编制护士培训计划和讲习班来完成,从而为该科室的患者提供最佳的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信