CONTExT-RA: a cross-sectional study evaluating disease activity, quality of life and the socio-demographic profile of Irish patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae132
Grainne Murphy, Killian O'Rourke, Angela Camon, David Kane, Finbar O'Shea, Richard Conway, Claire Sheehy, Moneeb Saddiq, Deirdre Moran
{"title":"CONTExT-RA: a cross-sectional study evaluating disease activity, quality of life and the socio-demographic profile of Irish patients with rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Grainne Murphy, Killian O'Rourke, Angela Camon, David Kane, Finbar O'Shea, Richard Conway, Claire Sheehy, Moneeb Saddiq, Deirdre Moran","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>CONTExT-RA is a cross-sectional, non-interventional multicentre study which enrolled patients diagnosed with RA and receiving DMARD treatment in a secondary care setting. The study evaluated disease control and associated disease burden amongst this Irish population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RA attending six Irish rheumatology centres were invited to participate. Each consented patient attended a single routine study visit. Disease activity was assessed using Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The primary endpoint was EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) stratified by CDAI, compared using a non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>130 patients were included. Using CDAI, 34 (26.2%) patients were in clinical remission (CR), 42 (32.3%) had low disease activity (LDA), 41 (31.5%) had moderate disease activity (MDA) and 13 (10.0%) had high disease activity (HDA). QoL (EQ-5D-5L index (median)) scores were significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) greater for patients in CR or CR/LDA than for those with MDA/HDA, 0.866 (0.920), 0.777 (0.822) vs 0.578 (0.691), respectively. Patients in CR reported higher levels of work productivity, mean (s.d.) rating of 1.7 (2.52) vs those in MDA/HDA of 4.2 (3.28) (higher rating indicates greater impairment). Similar findings were observed for non-work-related activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disease control for many patients with RA, treated in secondary care in Ireland, is sub-optimal with only 1 in 4 in CDAI remission. The impact of poor disease control on QoL is significant, and the superior outcomes for patients in CR provide compelling evidence that by achieving greater disease control, the burden of disease on patients can be greatly reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"rkae132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: CONTExT-RA is a cross-sectional, non-interventional multicentre study which enrolled patients diagnosed with RA and receiving DMARD treatment in a secondary care setting. The study evaluated disease control and associated disease burden amongst this Irish population.

Methods: Patients with RA attending six Irish rheumatology centres were invited to participate. Each consented patient attended a single routine study visit. Disease activity was assessed using Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The primary endpoint was EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) stratified by CDAI, compared using a non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test.

Results: 130 patients were included. Using CDAI, 34 (26.2%) patients were in clinical remission (CR), 42 (32.3%) had low disease activity (LDA), 41 (31.5%) had moderate disease activity (MDA) and 13 (10.0%) had high disease activity (HDA). QoL (EQ-5D-5L index (median)) scores were significantly (P < 0.001) greater for patients in CR or CR/LDA than for those with MDA/HDA, 0.866 (0.920), 0.777 (0.822) vs 0.578 (0.691), respectively. Patients in CR reported higher levels of work productivity, mean (s.d.) rating of 1.7 (2.52) vs those in MDA/HDA of 4.2 (3.28) (higher rating indicates greater impairment). Similar findings were observed for non-work-related activities.

Conclusion: Disease control for many patients with RA, treated in secondary care in Ireland, is sub-optimal with only 1 in 4 in CDAI remission. The impact of poor disease control on QoL is significant, and the superior outcomes for patients in CR provide compelling evidence that by achieving greater disease control, the burden of disease on patients can be greatly reduced.

CONTExT-RA:一项横断面研究,评估爱尔兰类风湿关节炎患者的疾病活动、生活质量和社会人口概况。
研究目的CONTExT-RA是一项横断面、非干预性多中心研究,研究对象是被诊断为RA并在二级医疗机构接受DMARD治疗的患者。该研究评估了这一爱尔兰人群的疾病控制情况和相关疾病负担:方法:邀请在爱尔兰六家风湿病中心就诊的RA患者参与研究。每位同意参与研究的患者都接受了一次常规检查。使用临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)评估疾病活动。主要终点是按CDAI分层的EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D-5L),采用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较:结果:共纳入 130 名患者。根据 CDAI,34 名患者(26.2%)处于临床缓解期(CR),42 名患者(32.3%)具有低度疾病活动(LDA),41 名患者(31.5%)具有中度疾病活动(MDA),13 名患者(10.0%)具有高度疾病活动(HDA)。患者的 QoL(EQ-5D-5L 指数(中位数))得分显著低于其他患者(P在爱尔兰,许多接受二级护理治疗的RA患者的疾病控制并不理想,每4人中只有1人的CDAI缓解。疾病控制不佳对QoL的影响很大,CR患者的卓越疗效提供了令人信服的证据,即通过加强疾病控制,可以大大减轻患者的疾病负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信