Parental Somatic Mosaicism Detected During Prenatal Diagnosis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/pd.6712
Natalie J Chandler, Elizabeth Scotchman, Fiona McKay, Vijaya Ramachandran, Lyn S Chitty
{"title":"Parental Somatic Mosaicism Detected During Prenatal Diagnosis.","authors":"Natalie J Chandler, Elizabeth Scotchman, Fiona McKay, Vijaya Ramachandran, Lyn S Chitty","doi":"10.1002/pd.6712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate recurrence risks are essential for genomic counselling and parental reproductive choices. Historically, Sanger sequencing was used to test parental samples, which has a limited sensitivity of ∼ 10% for detecting somatic mosaicism. Next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, utilised for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and trio prenatal exome sequencing in our laboratory, have greater sensitivity. Here we review the cases of parental somatic mosaicism we have detected and discuss its impact on management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Laboratory databases from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2022 were reviewed to identify all cases where parental somatic mosaicism was detected during NIPD and prenatal exome testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the development of NIPD testing, we identified 10/131 (7.6%) families with parental somatic mosaicism. In six cases where NGS detected levels between 0.37% and 8.82%, prior testing with Sanger sequencing had not detected mosaicism. In our exome sequencing cohort, we detected parental mosaicism in 4/101 (3.96%) cases. Clinical features of the condition were identified in 2/14 parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity of the testing technique needs to be considered when counselling parents on recurrence risk. Parents need to be aware that modern approaches to prenatal diagnosis may allow identification of mosaicism, which may have implications for their own health and change recurrence risks for future pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurate recurrence risks are essential for genomic counselling and parental reproductive choices. Historically, Sanger sequencing was used to test parental samples, which has a limited sensitivity of ∼ 10% for detecting somatic mosaicism. Next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, utilised for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and trio prenatal exome sequencing in our laboratory, have greater sensitivity. Here we review the cases of parental somatic mosaicism we have detected and discuss its impact on management.

Method: Laboratory databases from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2022 were reviewed to identify all cases where parental somatic mosaicism was detected during NIPD and prenatal exome testing.

Results: During the development of NIPD testing, we identified 10/131 (7.6%) families with parental somatic mosaicism. In six cases where NGS detected levels between 0.37% and 8.82%, prior testing with Sanger sequencing had not detected mosaicism. In our exome sequencing cohort, we detected parental mosaicism in 4/101 (3.96%) cases. Clinical features of the condition were identified in 2/14 parents.

Conclusion: The sensitivity of the testing technique needs to be considered when counselling parents on recurrence risk. Parents need to be aware that modern approaches to prenatal diagnosis may allow identification of mosaicism, which may have implications for their own health and change recurrence risks for future pregnancies.

产前诊断中检测到的父母体细胞嵌合。
目的:准确的复发风险对基因组咨询和父母的生育选择至关重要。一直以来,人们使用桑格测序法检测父母样本,但这种方法检测体细胞嵌合的灵敏度有限,仅为 10%。我们实验室用于无创产前诊断(NIPD)和三重产前外显子组测序的下一代测序(NGS)方法具有更高的灵敏度。在此,我们回顾了已发现的父母体细胞马赛克病例,并讨论了其对管理的影响:方法:回顾2015年1月1日至2022年9月30日的实验室数据库,以确定所有在NIPD和产前外显子组检测中发现父母体细胞嵌合的病例:在 NIPD 检测的发展过程中,我们发现 10/131 个(7.6%)家庭存在父母体细胞嵌合现象。在 NGS 检测出 0.37% 至 8.82% 嵌合水平的 6 个病例中,之前的 Sanger 测序检测未检测出嵌合。在我们的外显子组测序队列中,我们在 4/101 个病例(3.96%)中检测到了亲本嵌合。结论:检测技术的灵敏度需要进一步提高:结论:在向父母提供复发风险咨询时,需要考虑检测技术的灵敏度。结论:在向父母提供有关复发风险的咨询时,需要考虑检测技术的灵敏度。父母需要意识到,现代产前诊断方法可以识别马赛克,这可能会对他们自身的健康产生影响,并改变未来妊娠的复发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信