Medication Refill Adherence in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Eye Disease.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arthi D Bharadwaj, Avisek Datta, Pooja Bhat, Ann-Marie Lobo-Chan
{"title":"Medication Refill Adherence in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Eye Disease.","authors":"Arthi D Bharadwaj, Avisek Datta, Pooja Bhat, Ann-Marie Lobo-Chan","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2024.2427257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To utilize pharmacy dispenses to investigate adherence rates to immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) for the treatment of noninfectious inflammatory eye disease (IED), impact of adherence on disease control, factors associated with nonadherence, and association between adherence in the medical record and pharmacy dispenses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective medical chart review was conducted on patients followed for at least 2 years in the uveitis clinic. Appointment and lab attendance, and provider documentation, determined adherence through the medical record. Dispense history was obtained from pharmacies, and IMT infusion dates were noted. Disease control was determined by clinical exam findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients qualified for the study. The mean age was 49 years (SD = 19.4), 76.2% were female, 36.5% were Black/African American, and 96.8% were taking 1 or 2 IMTs. Pharmacy refill data was collected from 58 patients to determine an adherence rate (AR) of 63.9%. Thirty-nine patients (67.2%) had an average AR < 85% by pharmacy refill data and were thus deemed nonadherent. The majority of patients (86.2%) achieved ocular inflammation control. Nonadherence was 4.72 times more likely in patients taking >1 medication compared to one medication alone (95% CI: 1.02-21.86, <i>p</i> = 0.047). Comparing adherence from information in the medical record to pharmacy refill data, 71.6% of IMT comparisons were congruent (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients taking IMT for >2 years demonstrated an AR < 65% based on pharmacy data. Most patients achieved ocular quiescence. Using pharmacy information as an objective measure of adherence correlates with assessing adherence through medical record information.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2024.2427257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To utilize pharmacy dispenses to investigate adherence rates to immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) for the treatment of noninfectious inflammatory eye disease (IED), impact of adherence on disease control, factors associated with nonadherence, and association between adherence in the medical record and pharmacy dispenses.

Method: Retrospective medical chart review was conducted on patients followed for at least 2 years in the uveitis clinic. Appointment and lab attendance, and provider documentation, determined adherence through the medical record. Dispense history was obtained from pharmacies, and IMT infusion dates were noted. Disease control was determined by clinical exam findings.

Results: Sixty-three patients qualified for the study. The mean age was 49 years (SD = 19.4), 76.2% were female, 36.5% were Black/African American, and 96.8% were taking 1 or 2 IMTs. Pharmacy refill data was collected from 58 patients to determine an adherence rate (AR) of 63.9%. Thirty-nine patients (67.2%) had an average AR < 85% by pharmacy refill data and were thus deemed nonadherent. The majority of patients (86.2%) achieved ocular inflammation control. Nonadherence was 4.72 times more likely in patients taking >1 medication compared to one medication alone (95% CI: 1.02-21.86, p = 0.047). Comparing adherence from information in the medical record to pharmacy refill data, 71.6% of IMT comparisons were congruent (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Patients taking IMT for >2 years demonstrated an AR < 65% based on pharmacy data. Most patients achieved ocular quiescence. Using pharmacy information as an objective measure of adherence correlates with assessing adherence through medical record information.

慢性炎症性眼病患者坚持补药的情况。
目的:利用药房配药调查治疗非感染性炎症性眼病(IED)的免疫抑制疗法(IMT)的依从率、依从率对疾病控制的影响、与不依从有关的因素以及病历中的依从率与药房配药之间的关联:方法:对葡萄膜炎诊所随访至少两年的患者进行回顾性病历审查。通过病历中的预约和化验考勤以及医疗服务提供者的记录来确定患者是否坚持用药。从药房获取配药史,并记录 IMT 输液日期。根据临床检查结果确定疾病控制情况:63名患者符合研究条件。平均年龄为 49 岁(SD = 19.4),76.2% 为女性,36.5% 为黑人/非裔美国人,96.8% 正在服用 1 或 2 种 IMT。我们收集了 58 名患者的药房续药数据,确定坚持服药率 (AR) 为 63.9%。39名患者(67.2%)的平均AR为1次服药与1次单独服药(95% CI:1.02-21.86,P = 0.047)。根据病历信息和药房续药数据比较依从性,71.6% 的 IMT 比较结果是一致的(p 结论:IMT 患者的依从性是一致的:服用 IMT 超过 2 年的患者显示出 AR
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信