Shelby B. Gasson, Lauren K. Dobson, Michaela R. Pfau-Cloud, Felipe O. Beltran, Carl A. Gregory, Melissa A. Grunlan, W. Brian Saunders
{"title":"Shape Memory Polymer Scaffolds—Utility for In Vitro Osteogenesis of Canine Multipotent Stromal Cells","authors":"Shelby B. Gasson, Lauren K. Dobson, Michaela R. Pfau-Cloud, Felipe O. Beltran, Carl A. Gregory, Melissa A. Grunlan, W. Brian Saunders","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A biodegradable, shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffold based on poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) represents an attractive alternative therapy for the repair of critically sized bone defects given its ability to press-fit within irregular defects. Clinical translation of SMP scaffolds requires successful movement beyond proof-of-concept rodent studies through a relevant large-animal model and into the clinical setting. In addition to representing a clinical veterinary population, the canine species is a strong translational model for humans due to similarities in orthopedic disorders, biomechanics, and bone healing. The present study was performed to assess in vitro cytocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation of canine multipotent stromal cells (cMSCs) cultured on SMP scaffolds in preparation for future canine in vivo studies. Two different SMP scaffold compositions were utilized: a “PCL-only” scaffold prepared from PCL-diacrylate (PCL-DA) and a semi-interpenetrating network (semi-IPN) formed from PCL-DA and poly(L-lactic acid) (PCL:PLLA). The PCL:PLLA scaffolds degrade faster and are more mechanically rigid versus the PCL scaffolds. Canine bone marrow–derived MSCs (cMSCs) were evaluated in terms of attachment, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. cMSCs exhibited excellent cytocompatibility, attachment, and proliferation on both SMP scaffold compositions. PCL scaffolds were more conducive to both early- and late-stage in vitro osteogenesis of cMSCs versus PCL:PLLA scaffolds. However, cMSCs deposited mineralized extracellular matrix over 21 days when cultured on both SMP scaffold compositions. These results demonstrate that the SMP scaffolds are suitable for in vitro cMSC attachment, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, representing a significant step toward canine in vivo studies and potential translation to human patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"112 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A biodegradable, shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffold based on poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) represents an attractive alternative therapy for the repair of critically sized bone defects given its ability to press-fit within irregular defects. Clinical translation of SMP scaffolds requires successful movement beyond proof-of-concept rodent studies through a relevant large-animal model and into the clinical setting. In addition to representing a clinical veterinary population, the canine species is a strong translational model for humans due to similarities in orthopedic disorders, biomechanics, and bone healing. The present study was performed to assess in vitro cytocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation of canine multipotent stromal cells (cMSCs) cultured on SMP scaffolds in preparation for future canine in vivo studies. Two different SMP scaffold compositions were utilized: a “PCL-only” scaffold prepared from PCL-diacrylate (PCL-DA) and a semi-interpenetrating network (semi-IPN) formed from PCL-DA and poly(L-lactic acid) (PCL:PLLA). The PCL:PLLA scaffolds degrade faster and are more mechanically rigid versus the PCL scaffolds. Canine bone marrow–derived MSCs (cMSCs) were evaluated in terms of attachment, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. cMSCs exhibited excellent cytocompatibility, attachment, and proliferation on both SMP scaffold compositions. PCL scaffolds were more conducive to both early- and late-stage in vitro osteogenesis of cMSCs versus PCL:PLLA scaffolds. However, cMSCs deposited mineralized extracellular matrix over 21 days when cultured on both SMP scaffold compositions. These results demonstrate that the SMP scaffolds are suitable for in vitro cMSC attachment, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, representing a significant step toward canine in vivo studies and potential translation to human patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats:
• original research reports
• short research and development reports
• scientific reviews
• current concepts articles
• special reports
• editorials
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.