Comparison of Tegoprazan and Lansoprazole in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis up to 4 Weeks: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator Phase 4 Trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14969
Cheol Min Shin, Suck Chei Choi, Jin Woong Cho, Seung Young Kim, Ok Jae Lee, Do Hoon Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Ju Yup Lee, Sang Kil Lee, Jeong Eun Shin, Gwang Ha Kim, Seon-Young Park, Su Jin Hong, Hye-Kyung Jung, Sang Jin Lee, Young Hoon Youn, Seong Woo Jeon, In Kyung Sung, Moo In Park, Oh Young Lee
{"title":"Comparison of Tegoprazan and Lansoprazole in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis up to 4 Weeks: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator Phase 4 Trial.","authors":"Cheol Min Shin, Suck Chei Choi, Jin Woong Cho, Seung Young Kim, Ok Jae Lee, Do Hoon Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Ju Yup Lee, Sang Kil Lee, Jeong Eun Shin, Gwang Ha Kim, Seon-Young Park, Su Jin Hong, Hye-Kyung Jung, Sang Jin Lee, Young Hoon Youn, Seong Woo Jeon, In Kyung Sung, Moo In Park, Oh Young Lee","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this study were to confirm the non-inferiority of tegoprazan to lansoprazole up to week 4 in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) and to evaluate its effectiveness in rapid mucosal healing and symptom relief at week 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator non-inferiority trial, 218 patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (Los Angeles Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan (50 mg) or lansoprazole (30 mg) group. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 4, as confirmed through endoscopy. The proportion of patients with healed EE at week 2 was also evaluated. Furthermore, CYP2C19 genotypes, symptoms, safety, and tolerability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>In the full-analysis set, 103 and 109 participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, were analyzed. The cumulative healing rates up to week 4 were 95.2% (98/103) and 86.2% (94/109) (difference [95% confidence interval], 8.91 [1.22-16.59]; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and 0.0266 for superiority), while those at week 2 were 88.4% (91/103) and 82.6% (90/109) (5.78 [-3.66-15.22], p = 0.0005 for non-inferiority) for tegoprazan and lansoprazole, respectively. Tegoprazan showed consistent healing rates regardless of CYP2C19 genotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>Tegoprazan was superior to lansoprazole in the treatment of EE up to 4 weeks. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify the superiority of tegoprazan, especially in the treatment of severe EE.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05267743.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to confirm the non-inferiority of tegoprazan to lansoprazole up to week 4 in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) and to evaluate its effectiveness in rapid mucosal healing and symptom relief at week 2.

Methods: In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator non-inferiority trial, 218 patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (Los Angeles Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan (50 mg) or lansoprazole (30 mg) group. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 4, as confirmed through endoscopy. The proportion of patients with healed EE at week 2 was also evaluated. Furthermore, CYP2C19 genotypes, symptoms, safety, and tolerability were assessed.

Key results: In the full-analysis set, 103 and 109 participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, were analyzed. The cumulative healing rates up to week 4 were 95.2% (98/103) and 86.2% (94/109) (difference [95% confidence interval], 8.91 [1.22-16.59]; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and 0.0266 for superiority), while those at week 2 were 88.4% (91/103) and 82.6% (90/109) (5.78 [-3.66-15.22], p = 0.0005 for non-inferiority) for tegoprazan and lansoprazole, respectively. Tegoprazan showed consistent healing rates regardless of CYP2C19 genotypes.

Conclusions and inferences: Tegoprazan was superior to lansoprazole in the treatment of EE up to 4 weeks. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify the superiority of tegoprazan, especially in the treatment of severe EE.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05267743.

比较替戈普拉赞和兰索拉唑对侵蚀性食管炎患者长达 4 周的治疗效果:一项多中心、随机、双盲、主动比较 4 期试验。
研究背景本研究的目的是确认在侵蚀性食管炎(EE)患者中,特戈普拉赞在第4周之前的疗效不优于兰索拉唑,并评估其在第2周时快速愈合粘膜和缓解症状的效果:在这项多中心、随机、双盲、主动比较非劣效性试验中,218 名经内镜确诊为侵蚀性食管炎(洛杉矶分级 A-D 级)的患者被随机分配到替戈拉赞(50 毫克)组或兰索拉唑(30 毫克)组。主要终点是经内镜检查确认的第4周EE痊愈患者的累计比例。此外,还评估了第 2 周 EE 愈合患者的比例。此外,还对 CYP2C19 基因型、症状、安全性和耐受性进行了评估:在完整的分析集中,分别分析了特戈普拉赞组和兰索拉唑组的103名和109名参与者。截至第 4 周的累积痊愈率分别为 95.2%(98/103)和 86.2%(94/109)(差异[95% 置信区间],8.91 [1.22-16.59]; p 结论和推论:在治疗 EE 长达 4 周方面,替戈普拉赞优于兰索拉唑。有必要开展进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并明确替戈普拉赞的优越性,尤其是在治疗严重EE方面:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT05267743。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信