Possible negative impact of polypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Soya Kawabata, Takehiro Michikawa, Sota Nagai, Yuki Akaike, Takaya Imai, Kei Ito, Hiroki Takeda, Daiki Ikeda, Shinjiro Kaneko, Nobuyuki Fujita
{"title":"Possible negative impact of polypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis","authors":"Soya Kawabata,&nbsp;Takehiro Michikawa,&nbsp;Sota Nagai,&nbsp;Yuki Akaike,&nbsp;Takaya Imai,&nbsp;Kei Ito,&nbsp;Hiroki Takeda,&nbsp;Daiki Ikeda,&nbsp;Shinjiro Kaneko,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Fujita","doi":"10.1111/ggi.15026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a higher incidence of polypharmacy attributed to comorbidities and the use of pain relief medications. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS based on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and locomotive syndrome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent lumbar spinal surgery for LSS were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the preoperative and 1- and 2-year postoperative scores of three common HRQOL tools and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale. The patients were classified into the hyperpolypharmacy group (those taking ≥10 medications), polypharmacy group (those taking 6–9 medications) and non-polypharmacy group (those taking ≤5 medications).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 148 participants were evaluated. Among them, 35 were included in the non-polypharmacy group. There were no significant changes in the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage at baseline, even with polypharmacy progression. However, the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage worsened postoperatively with polypharmacy progression. When surgical efficacy was directly examined, results showed that the surgical outcomes were significantly associated with polypharmacy progression in older patients with LSS, even after adjusting for potential confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Polypharmacy, especially hyperpolypharmacy, had a negative impact on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS. The number of prescription drugs should be taken into consideration before surgery in this patient group. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 31–37</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.15026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a higher incidence of polypharmacy attributed to comorbidities and the use of pain relief medications. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS based on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and locomotive syndrome.

Methods

Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent lumbar spinal surgery for LSS were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the preoperative and 1- and 2-year postoperative scores of three common HRQOL tools and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale. The patients were classified into the hyperpolypharmacy group (those taking ≥10 medications), polypharmacy group (those taking 6–9 medications) and non-polypharmacy group (those taking ≤5 medications).

Results

In total, 148 participants were evaluated. Among them, 35 were included in the non-polypharmacy group. There were no significant changes in the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage at baseline, even with polypharmacy progression. However, the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage worsened postoperatively with polypharmacy progression. When surgical efficacy was directly examined, results showed that the surgical outcomes were significantly associated with polypharmacy progression in older patients with LSS, even after adjusting for potential confounders.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy, especially hyperpolypharmacy, had a negative impact on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS. The number of prescription drugs should be taken into consideration before surgery in this patient group. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 31–37.

多种药物对老年腰椎管狭窄症患者手术效果的可能负面影响。
目的:老年腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者由于合并症和使用止痛药物,多药治疗的发生率较高。本研究旨在根据健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和运动综合征,探讨多药和过度多药对老年腰椎管狭窄症患者手术效果的影响:我们对年龄≥65 岁、因 LSS 而接受腰椎手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们评估了三种常见 HRQOL 工具和 25 个问题的老年运动功能量表的术前评分、术后 1 年和 2 年评分。患者被分为多药组(服用药物≥10种)、多药组(服用药物6-9种)和非多药组(服用药物≤5种):共有 148 名参与者接受了评估。结果:共对 148 名参与者进行了评估,其中 35 人被纳入非多药组。基线时的 HRQOL 和运动综合征阶段没有明显变化,即使是在多药治疗进展时也是如此。然而,术后随着多药治疗的进展,患者的 HRQOL 和运动综合征阶段会恶化。在直接检查手术疗效时,结果显示,即使在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,老年 LSS 患者的手术疗效仍与多重药物治疗进展有显著相关:结论:多药治疗,尤其是过度多药治疗,对老年 LSS 患者的手术效果有负面影响。在对这一患者群体进行手术前,应考虑处方药的数量。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; --:-----.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信