Resting metabolic rate and energy efficiency in response to an intensive 84-day combat-swimmer training in the German Armed Forces.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05659-0
Tony H Richter, Wiebke Braun, Lorenz Scheit, Jan Schröder, Rüdiger Reer, Volker Harth, Katrin Bender, Andreas Koch, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Manfred J Müller
{"title":"Resting metabolic rate and energy efficiency in response to an intensive 84-day combat-swimmer training in the German Armed Forces.","authors":"Tony H Richter, Wiebke Braun, Lorenz Scheit, Jan Schröder, Rüdiger Reer, Volker Harth, Katrin Bender, Andreas Koch, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Manfred J Müller","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05659-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>According to the 'constrained model', there are compensations in resting metabolic rate (RMR) at high levels of physical activity (PA). Here, we have used a standardized combat-swimmer training protocol (CST) to investigate whether changes in RMR (i) confirm the 'constraint model', and (ii) differ between successful participants and dropouts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Controlled 84d CST in 44 male soldiers with 13 finally successful. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance. RMR was assessed by indirect calorimetry, VO<sub>2max</sub>, and work efficiency by treadmill spiroergometry. Plasma levels of thyroid hormones, testosterone, and cortisol were analysed by standard laboratory methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CST increased VO<sub>2max</sub> (+ 6.9%) and exercise efficiency at low workloads of 10 and 12 km/h (+ 8.7 and + 6.5%; both p < 0.05). As energy balance was moderately negative (-356 ± 383 kcal/d), FFM and FM decreased (-2 and -16%; both p < 0.05). There was a considerable inter-individual variance but no change in in the mean values of RMR and RMR<sub>adjFFM</sub>. RMR<sub>adjFFM</sub> before CST had a negative association with its decrease with CST (p < 0.005). Concomitantly, plasma hormone levels were unchanged. When compared with dropouts, successful participants had a higher VO<sub>2max</sub> at baseline (5.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.9 ± 04 l/min; p < 0.05) that increased with CST (+ 4.4 vs. -0.4%; p < 0.05) at similar changes in body composition and energy balance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While CST increased VO<sub>2max</sub> and exercise efficiency as a compensation, there was an inter-individual variance in exercise-related compensation of RMR with no differences between 'completers' and 'non-completers'. Trial registration DRKS00018850, November 27, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05659-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: According to the 'constrained model', there are compensations in resting metabolic rate (RMR) at high levels of physical activity (PA). Here, we have used a standardized combat-swimmer training protocol (CST) to investigate whether changes in RMR (i) confirm the 'constraint model', and (ii) differ between successful participants and dropouts.

Methods: Controlled 84d CST in 44 male soldiers with 13 finally successful. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance. RMR was assessed by indirect calorimetry, VO2max, and work efficiency by treadmill spiroergometry. Plasma levels of thyroid hormones, testosterone, and cortisol were analysed by standard laboratory methods.

Results: CST increased VO2max (+ 6.9%) and exercise efficiency at low workloads of 10 and 12 km/h (+ 8.7 and + 6.5%; both p < 0.05). As energy balance was moderately negative (-356 ± 383 kcal/d), FFM and FM decreased (-2 and -16%; both p < 0.05). There was a considerable inter-individual variance but no change in in the mean values of RMR and RMRadjFFM. RMRadjFFM before CST had a negative association with its decrease with CST (p < 0.005). Concomitantly, plasma hormone levels were unchanged. When compared with dropouts, successful participants had a higher VO2max at baseline (5.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.9 ± 04 l/min; p < 0.05) that increased with CST (+ 4.4 vs. -0.4%; p < 0.05) at similar changes in body composition and energy balance.

Conclusion: While CST increased VO2max and exercise efficiency as a compensation, there was an inter-individual variance in exercise-related compensation of RMR with no differences between 'completers' and 'non-completers'. Trial registration DRKS00018850, November 27, 2019.

德国武装部队进行为期 84 天的高强度战斗游泳训练后的静息代谢率和能量效率。
目的:根据 "约束模型",在高水平体力活动(PA)时,静息代谢率(RMR)会得到补偿。在此,我们使用标准化的战斗游泳训练方案(CST)来研究 RMR 的变化是否(i)证实了 "约束模型",以及(ii)在成功参与者和退出者之间存在差异:方法:对 44 名男性士兵进行为期 84 天的 CST 控制性训练,其中 13 人最终成功。使用定量磁共振测量脂肪量(FM)和无脂肪量(FFM)。通过间接热量计评估RMR,通过跑步机螺旋测力计评估VO2max和工作效率。血浆中的甲状腺激素、睾酮和皮质醇水平采用标准实验室方法进行分析:结果:CST提高了VO2max(+ 6.9%),并提高了10和12 km/h低负荷下的运动效率(+ 8.7和+ 6.5%;均为p adjFFM。CST 前的 RMRadjFFM 与 CST 时的 RMRadjFFM 下降呈负相关(p 2max at baseline (5.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.9 ± 04 l/min; p 结论:虽然 CST 作为一种补偿提高了 VO2max 和运动效率,但与运动相关的 RMR 补偿存在个体间差异,"完成者 "和 "未完成者 "之间没有差异。试验注册 DRKS00018850,2019 年 11 月 27 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信