Intraoperative angulation of the C-arm for X-ray of each curved surface of the femoral neck wall: a cadaveric study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Qiu-Liang Zhu, Xiang-Ping Yu, Jun Ma, Fang Lin, Yun-Yun Chen, Wen-Bin Ruan
{"title":"Intraoperative angulation of the C-arm for X-ray of each curved surface of the femoral neck wall: a cadaveric study.","authors":"Qiu-Liang Zhu, Xiang-Ping Yu, Jun Ma, Fang Lin, Yun-Yun Chen, Wen-Bin Ruan","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08074-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C-arm fluoroscopy is the main method assisting surgical reduction and internal fixation of the femoral neck, as traditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy is insufficient for visualizing the irregular anatomical structure of the femoral neck. We analysed the anatomy of the femoral neck to ascertain the optimal position and angle of the C-arm for adequate visualization of the femoral neck during fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The femoral neck was divided into anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces. These surfaces and the coronal plane of the femur formed the anterior surface coronal angle (ACA), posterosuperior surface coronal angle (PSCA) and posteroinferior surface coronal angle (PICA), respectively. Three angles of 32 dried femoral samples were measured. In the aluminium model, steel wires penetrated the femoral neck wall, whereas, in the wire model, three Kirschner wires penetrated the femoral neck wall. The C-arm was rotated 5° for a 0°-180° fluoroscopic view of each curved surface. Each specimen was imaged, totalling 111 frames. The optimal angle for fluoroscopic imaging of each surface was ascertained, and fluoroscopic features of the Kirschner wire penetrating the femoral neck cortex at three different angles on fluoroscopy and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The femoral neck is irregularly shaped and cylindrical, with the anterior surface longer than the posteroinferior surface. The ACA, PSCA and PICA were 31 ± 4.589°, 67.813 ± 5.052° and 168.688 ± 3.206°, respectively. The optimal angles for visualizing the anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces of the steel wire aluminium foil model under fluoroscopy were 30.781 ± 5.464°, 67.969 ± 3.721°, and 167.813 ± 4.319°, respectively. There was no significant difference in the measurements of the corresponding surface coronal angles (P > 0.05). Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral neck wall were difficult to visualize on traditional anteroposterior and lateral films. Increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allowed clear visualization of Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral cortex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views are insufficient for clear visualization of the true structure of the femoral neck. Additionally, increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allows observation of the fracture reduction quality from the anterior surface, posterosuperior surface and posteroinferior surface of the femoral neck and the damage to the corresponding cortical bone caused by internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08074-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: C-arm fluoroscopy is the main method assisting surgical reduction and internal fixation of the femoral neck, as traditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy is insufficient for visualizing the irregular anatomical structure of the femoral neck. We analysed the anatomy of the femoral neck to ascertain the optimal position and angle of the C-arm for adequate visualization of the femoral neck during fluoroscopy.

Methods: The femoral neck was divided into anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces. These surfaces and the coronal plane of the femur formed the anterior surface coronal angle (ACA), posterosuperior surface coronal angle (PSCA) and posteroinferior surface coronal angle (PICA), respectively. Three angles of 32 dried femoral samples were measured. In the aluminium model, steel wires penetrated the femoral neck wall, whereas, in the wire model, three Kirschner wires penetrated the femoral neck wall. The C-arm was rotated 5° for a 0°-180° fluoroscopic view of each curved surface. Each specimen was imaged, totalling 111 frames. The optimal angle for fluoroscopic imaging of each surface was ascertained, and fluoroscopic features of the Kirschner wire penetrating the femoral neck cortex at three different angles on fluoroscopy and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were observed.

Results: The femoral neck is irregularly shaped and cylindrical, with the anterior surface longer than the posteroinferior surface. The ACA, PSCA and PICA were 31 ± 4.589°, 67.813 ± 5.052° and 168.688 ± 3.206°, respectively. The optimal angles for visualizing the anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces of the steel wire aluminium foil model under fluoroscopy were 30.781 ± 5.464°, 67.969 ± 3.721°, and 167.813 ± 4.319°, respectively. There was no significant difference in the measurements of the corresponding surface coronal angles (P > 0.05). Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral neck wall were difficult to visualize on traditional anteroposterior and lateral films. Increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allowed clear visualization of Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral cortex.

Conclusion: Traditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views are insufficient for clear visualization of the true structure of the femoral neck. Additionally, increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allows observation of the fracture reduction quality from the anterior surface, posterosuperior surface and posteroinferior surface of the femoral neck and the damage to the corresponding cortical bone caused by internal fixation.

Level of evidence: Level II.

股骨颈壁各弯曲表面 X 射线的 C 型臂术中角度调整:一项尸体研究。
背景:C型臂透视是辅助股骨颈缩窄和内固定手术的主要方法,因为传统的正位和侧位透视不足以观察股骨颈的不规则解剖结构。我们分析了股骨颈的解剖结构,以确定 C 臂的最佳位置和角度,从而在透视过程中充分观察股骨颈:股骨颈分为前方、后上方和后下方表面。这些表面与股骨冠状面分别形成前表面冠状角(ACA)、后上表面冠状角(PSCA)和后下表面冠状角(PICA)。对 32 个干燥股骨样本的三个角度进行了测量。在铝制模型中,钢丝穿透股骨颈壁,而在金属丝模型中,三根基尔希纳钢丝穿透股骨颈壁。C 型臂旋转 5°,对每个弯曲表面进行 0°-180° 透视。每个标本都进行了成像,共计 111 帧。确定了每个曲面透视成像的最佳角度,并观察了透视和正侧位及侧位X光片上 Kirschner钢丝从三个不同角度穿透股骨颈皮质的透视特征:股骨颈呈不规则圆柱形,前表面长于后内表面。ACA、PSCA 和 PICA 分别为 31 ± 4.589°、67.813 ± 5.052°和 168.688 ± 3.206°。透视下观察钢丝铝箔模型前方、后上方和后下方表面的最佳角度分别为 30.781 ± 5.464°、67.969 ± 3.721°和 167.813 ± 4.319°。相应表面冠状角的测量结果无明显差异(P > 0.05)。穿透股骨颈壁的 Kirschner 线在传统的正侧位和侧位片上很难观察到。将透视角度增大到30°、70°或170°,可以清晰地观察到穿透股骨皮质的Kirschner导线:结论:传统的正后方和侧方透视图不足以清晰显示股骨颈的真实结构。此外,将透视角度增加到30°、70°或170°,可从股骨颈前表面、后上方表面和后下方表面观察骨折复位质量,以及内固定对相应皮质骨造成的损伤:证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信