Perioperative Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults: A Single-center Retrospective Review and Analysis.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005312
Ashie Kapoor, Michael W Wolfe, Weiting Chen, Peyman Benharash, Vadim Gudzenko
{"title":"Perioperative Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults: A Single-center Retrospective Review and Analysis.","authors":"Ashie Kapoor, Michael W Wolfe, Weiting Chen, Peyman Benharash, Vadim Gudzenko","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest has been associated with improved survival compared with conventional CPR. Perioperative patients represent a unique cohort of the inpatient population. This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal CPR for perioperative cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of perioperative extracorporeal CPR in adults from January 2015 to August 2022 was performed. Patient demographics, cardiac arrest variables, and outcome data were obtained and analyzed. The primary study outcome was survival with favorable neurologic outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 patients received extracorporeal CPR for perioperative cardiac arrest. Of the 33 patients, 24 (73%) had a cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, while 9 (27%) had a cardiac arrest in the operating room or interventional radiology suite. Survival to discharge was 57.6%, of whom 17 (89.5%) had neurologically favorable outcomes with cerebral performance category scores of 1 or 2 at discharge. The mean total CPR time was significantly lower in the survivor group than in the nonsurvivor group (16.5 vs . 25.0 min; P < 0.05). Survivors had significantly lower lactate levels (73 mg/dl vs . 115 mg/dl; P = 0.005) and higher pH levels (7.17 vs. 7.03; P = 0.005) compared with nonsurvivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of extracorporeal CPR for adults with perioperative cardiac arrest can be associated with excellent survival with neurologically favorable outcomes in carefully selected patients. Longer CPR time, higher lactate levels, and lower pH were associated with increased mortality. Given the small sample size, no other prognostic factors were identified, although certain trends were detected between survival groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"511-521"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest has been associated with improved survival compared with conventional CPR. Perioperative patients represent a unique cohort of the inpatient population. This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal CPR for perioperative cardiac arrest.

Methods: A single-center retrospective review of perioperative extracorporeal CPR in adults from January 2015 to August 2022 was performed. Patient demographics, cardiac arrest variables, and outcome data were obtained and analyzed. The primary study outcome was survival with favorable neurologic outcome.

Results: A total of 33 patients received extracorporeal CPR for perioperative cardiac arrest. Of the 33 patients, 24 (73%) had a cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, while 9 (27%) had a cardiac arrest in the operating room or interventional radiology suite. Survival to discharge was 57.6%, of whom 17 (89.5%) had neurologically favorable outcomes with cerebral performance category scores of 1 or 2 at discharge. The mean total CPR time was significantly lower in the survivor group than in the nonsurvivor group (16.5 vs . 25.0 min; P < 0.05). Survivors had significantly lower lactate levels (73 mg/dl vs . 115 mg/dl; P = 0.005) and higher pH levels (7.17 vs. 7.03; P = 0.005) compared with nonsurvivors.

Conclusions: The use of extracorporeal CPR for adults with perioperative cardiac arrest can be associated with excellent survival with neurologically favorable outcomes in carefully selected patients. Longer CPR time, higher lactate levels, and lower pH were associated with increased mortality. Given the small sample size, no other prognostic factors were identified, although certain trends were detected between survival groups.

成人围手术期体外心肺复苏:单中心回顾性分析。
简介:与传统心肺复苏术(CPR)相比,体外心肺复苏术(ECPR)治疗难治性院内心脏骤停可提高存活率。围手术期病人是住院病人中的一个特殊群体。本研究旨在描述和分析因围手术期心脏骤停(POCA)而接受 ECPR 的患者的特征和预后:方法:对 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间成人围手术期 ECPR 进行了单中心回顾性研究。获得并分析了患者的人口统计学特征、心脏骤停变量和结果数据。研究的主要结果是神经功能良好的存活率:结果:共有 33 名患者因 POCA 而接受了 ECPR。33名患者中,24人(73%)在心导管室发生心脏骤停,9人(27%)在手术室或介入放射室发生心脏骤停。患者出院后的存活率为 57.6%,其中 17 例(89.5%)出院时脑功能分类 (CPC) 评分为 1 分或 2 分,神经功能良好。存活组的平均心肺复苏总时间明显低于非存活组(16.5 分钟对 25.0 分钟,P结论:对于经过严格筛选的成人 POCA 患者,使用 ECPR 可使其获得极佳的存活率和良好的神经功能预后。较长的心肺复苏时间、较高的乳酸水平和较低的 pH 值与死亡率增加有关。由于样本量较小,虽然在不同存活组之间发现了某些趋势,但并未发现其他预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信