A new concept for correction of instrumental isotopic fractionation in MC-ICP-MS using a pair of monoisotopic elements: a critical evaluation†

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Andrii Tupys, Klaudia Tetfejer, Ludwik Halicz, Ewa Bulska and Jakub Karasiński
{"title":"A new concept for correction of instrumental isotopic fractionation in MC-ICP-MS using a pair of monoisotopic elements: a critical evaluation†","authors":"Andrii Tupys, Klaudia Tetfejer, Ludwik Halicz, Ewa Bulska and Jakub Karasiński","doi":"10.1039/D4JA00117F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this research work, we investigated the possibility of using mixtures of monoisotopic elements (<small><sup>93</sup></small>Nb/<small><sup>89</sup></small>Y, <small><sup>165</sup></small>Ho/<small><sup>159</sup></small>Tb and <small><sup>209</sup></small>Bi/<small><sup>197</sup></small>Au) as calibrators for accurate determination of isotope ratios by multicollector mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). The potential advantage of using monoisotopic elements for calibration lies in their significantly lower uncertainty in atomic masses. This would certainly affect the uncertainty of a measured isotope ratio after data processing, particularly if absolute isotope ratios are being evaluated. Model isotopic systems (<small><sup>87</sup></small>Sr/<small><sup>86</sup></small>Sr–<small><sup>93</sup></small>Nb/<small><sup>89</sup></small>Y, <small><sup>92</sup></small>Zr/<small><sup>90</sup></small>Zr–<small><sup>93</sup></small>Nb/<small><sup>89</sup></small>Y, <small><sup>208</sup></small>Pb/<small><sup>207</sup></small>Pb–<small><sup>209</sup></small>Bi/<small><sup>197</sup></small>Au and <small><sup>167</sup></small>Er/<small><sup>166</sup></small>Er–<small><sup>165</sup></small>Ho/<small><sup>159</sup></small>Tb) were selected and the Internal Standard method (Russell's law) and optimized regression model (ORM) for isotope measurements, using the mentioned mixtures of monoisotopic elements as calibrators, were applied. The precision and trueness of the obtained results were assessed. For example, the <small><sup>167</sup></small>Er/<small><sup>166</sup></small>Er isotope ratio in a certified reference material of erbium was measured using a gravimetric mixture of Ho and Tb as well as a <small><sup>160</sup></small>Gd/<small><sup>158</sup></small>Gd pair (NRC GADS-1) as instrumental isotopic fractionation (IIF) calibrators in ORM. Although the average result for both approaches was in the range of instrumental error (0.68223 ± 0.00351 with <small><sup>165</sup></small>Ho/<small><sup>159</sup></small>Tb and 0.68236 ± 0.00034 with <small><sup>160</sup></small>Gd/<small><sup>158</sup></small>Gd), the precision was ten times lower when a mixture of monoisotopic elements was used for correction. Based on the results obtained, it was assessed that Russell's law does not provide a correct description for systems with a mixture of two monoisotopic elements, probably due to the assumption of equal IIF for the analyte and internal calibrator. In our opinion, such an assumption is not true in a system when the internal calibrator is a pair of two different elements. A new mathematical description of such a system could enable the introduction of a suitable correction. The ORM method is free from assumptions about the same IIF for individual chemical entities and for this reason it looks more encouraging and shows the potential to be useable even with a mixture of monoisotopic elements as calibrators. In this paper we present experimental results confirming this assumption, although the current challenge is to ensure a sufficiently high precision of calibrator ratio measurement and, consequently, better regression linearity and higher precision of the obtained results.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 12","pages":" 3142-3150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ja/d4ja00117f?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ja/d4ja00117f","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research work, we investigated the possibility of using mixtures of monoisotopic elements (93Nb/89Y, 165Ho/159Tb and 209Bi/197Au) as calibrators for accurate determination of isotope ratios by multicollector mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). The potential advantage of using monoisotopic elements for calibration lies in their significantly lower uncertainty in atomic masses. This would certainly affect the uncertainty of a measured isotope ratio after data processing, particularly if absolute isotope ratios are being evaluated. Model isotopic systems (87Sr/86Sr–93Nb/89Y, 92Zr/90Zr–93Nb/89Y, 208Pb/207Pb–209Bi/197Au and 167Er/166Er–165Ho/159Tb) were selected and the Internal Standard method (Russell's law) and optimized regression model (ORM) for isotope measurements, using the mentioned mixtures of monoisotopic elements as calibrators, were applied. The precision and trueness of the obtained results were assessed. For example, the 167Er/166Er isotope ratio in a certified reference material of erbium was measured using a gravimetric mixture of Ho and Tb as well as a 160Gd/158Gd pair (NRC GADS-1) as instrumental isotopic fractionation (IIF) calibrators in ORM. Although the average result for both approaches was in the range of instrumental error (0.68223 ± 0.00351 with 165Ho/159Tb and 0.68236 ± 0.00034 with 160Gd/158Gd), the precision was ten times lower when a mixture of monoisotopic elements was used for correction. Based on the results obtained, it was assessed that Russell's law does not provide a correct description for systems with a mixture of two monoisotopic elements, probably due to the assumption of equal IIF for the analyte and internal calibrator. In our opinion, such an assumption is not true in a system when the internal calibrator is a pair of two different elements. A new mathematical description of such a system could enable the introduction of a suitable correction. The ORM method is free from assumptions about the same IIF for individual chemical entities and for this reason it looks more encouraging and shows the potential to be useable even with a mixture of monoisotopic elements as calibrators. In this paper we present experimental results confirming this assumption, although the current challenge is to ensure a sufficiently high precision of calibrator ratio measurement and, consequently, better regression linearity and higher precision of the obtained results.

Abstract Image

利用一对单同位素元素校正 MC-ICP-MS 仪器同位素分馏的新概念:重要评估†。
在这项研究工作中,我们探讨了利用单同位素元素(93Nb/89Y、165Ho/159Tb 和 209Bi/197Au)混合物作为校准物,通过多收集器质谱法(MC-ICP-MS)准确测定同位素比值的可能性。使用单同位素元素进行校准的潜在优势在于其原子质量的不确定性要低得多。这肯定会影响数据处理后测得的同位素比值的不确定性,特别是在评估绝对同位素比值的情况下。选择了模型同位素系统(87Sr/86Sr-93Nb/89Y、92Zr/90Zr-93Nb/89Y、208Pb/207Pb-209Bi/197Au 和 167Er/166Er-165Ho/159Tb),并使用上述单同位素元素混合物作为校准物,采用内标法(罗素定律)和优化回归模型(ORM)进行同位素测量。对所得结果的精确性和真实性进行了评估。例如,在 ORM 中使用 Ho 和 Tb 的重量测量混合物以及 160Gd/158Gd 对(NRC GADS-1)作为仪器同位素分馏(IIF)校准物,测量了铒的认证参考材料中的 167Er/166Er 同位素比率。虽然这两种方法的平均结果都在仪器误差范围内(165Ho/159Tb 为 0.68223 ± 0.00351,160Gd/158Gd 为 0.68236 ± 0.00034),但如果使用单同位素元素混合物进行校正,精确度要低十倍。根据所获得的结果,我们认为罗素定律并不能正确描述含有两种单异位元素混合物的系 统,这可能是由于假设分析物和内部校准物的 IIF 相等所致。我们认为,当内部校准物是一对两种不同元素时,这种假设在系统中并不成立。对这种系统进行新的数学描述,可以引入适当的修正。ORM 方法不需要假设单个化学实体具有相同的 IIF,因此它看起来更令人鼓舞,并显示出即使使用单异位元素混合物作为校准物也可以使用的潜力。我们在本文中展示的实验结果证实了这一假设,不过目前的挑战是如何确保校准物比率测量的精度足够高,从而获得更好的回归线性和更高精度的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信