High-precision MC-ICP-MS measurements of Cd isotopes using a novel double spike method without Sn isobaric interference†

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jin Li, Suo-han Tang, Xiangkun Zhu, Jian-xiong Ma, Zhiyong Zhu and Bin Yan
{"title":"High-precision MC-ICP-MS measurements of Cd isotopes using a novel double spike method without Sn isobaric interference†","authors":"Jin Li, Suo-han Tang, Xiangkun Zhu, Jian-xiong Ma, Zhiyong Zhu and Bin Yan","doi":"10.1039/D4JA00357H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Previous studies have reported that even low concentrations of Sn can lead to biased Cd isotopic measurements using MC-ICP-MS. In this paper, we propose a novel method of Cd isotopic analysis involving use of a <small><sup>106</sup></small>Cd–<small><sup>111</sup></small>Cd double spike. To eliminate isobaric interference from <small><sup>114</sup></small>Sn, we use <small><sup>113</sup></small>Cd together with <small><sup>106</sup></small>Cd, <small><sup>110</sup></small>Cd, and <small><sup>111</sup></small>Cd to obtain <em>δ</em><small><sup>113/110</sup></small>Cd, and then calculate <em>δ</em><small><sup>114/110</sup></small>Cd as 1.33 × <em>δ</em><small><sup>113/110</sup></small>Cd. We find that when Sn/Cd is ≤2.5 in sample solutions, <em>δ</em><small><sup>114/110</sup></small>Cd values are not affected by Sn, which behaves as a matrix element rather than causing isobaric interference. Cd isotopic measurements are not sensitive to the molarities of diluted HNO<small><sub>3</sub></small> or the Cd concentration. Additionally, when Mo/Cd, Ni/Cd, and Se/Cd are ≤1 in sample solutions, Cd isotopic measurements are not significantly affected. Instead, when Zn/Cd is &gt;0.1, In/Cd &gt; 0.05, and Pd/Cd &gt; 5 × 10<small><sup>−3</sup></small>, the measured <em>δ</em><small><sup>114/110</sup></small>Cd values deviate significantly from zero. However, Zn and In can be eliminated completely, and Pd was not detected in any Cd eluents. The <em>δ</em><small><sup>114/110</sup></small>Cd values of three standard solutions (Spex-CUGB, BAM I012, and Münster) and four geochemical reference materials (SGR-1b, BCR-2, GSD-7a, and NIST 2711a) were measured and found to be in close agreement with published results (with 2SD and ranges for all data of less than 0.090 and 0.120, respectively). This indicates that the data obtained by our double spike method are precise and reliable. Additionally, our new technique can help to simplify separation procedures, thus saving time and reducing the quantities of acid required.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 12","pages":" 3106-3115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ja/d4ja00357h","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that even low concentrations of Sn can lead to biased Cd isotopic measurements using MC-ICP-MS. In this paper, we propose a novel method of Cd isotopic analysis involving use of a 106Cd–111Cd double spike. To eliminate isobaric interference from 114Sn, we use 113Cd together with 106Cd, 110Cd, and 111Cd to obtain δ113/110Cd, and then calculate δ114/110Cd as 1.33 × δ113/110Cd. We find that when Sn/Cd is ≤2.5 in sample solutions, δ114/110Cd values are not affected by Sn, which behaves as a matrix element rather than causing isobaric interference. Cd isotopic measurements are not sensitive to the molarities of diluted HNO3 or the Cd concentration. Additionally, when Mo/Cd, Ni/Cd, and Se/Cd are ≤1 in sample solutions, Cd isotopic measurements are not significantly affected. Instead, when Zn/Cd is >0.1, In/Cd > 0.05, and Pd/Cd > 5 × 10−3, the measured δ114/110Cd values deviate significantly from zero. However, Zn and In can be eliminated completely, and Pd was not detected in any Cd eluents. The δ114/110Cd values of three standard solutions (Spex-CUGB, BAM I012, and Münster) and four geochemical reference materials (SGR-1b, BCR-2, GSD-7a, and NIST 2711a) were measured and found to be in close agreement with published results (with 2SD and ranges for all data of less than 0.090 and 0.120, respectively). This indicates that the data obtained by our double spike method are precise and reliable. Additionally, our new technique can help to simplify separation procedures, thus saving time and reducing the quantities of acid required.

Abstract Image

使用新型双峰值法对镉同位素进行高精度 MC-ICP-MS 测量,无 Sn 等位干扰†。
以往的研究表明,即使是低浓度的锡也会导致使用 MC-ICP-MS 进行的镉同位素测量产生偏差。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的镉同位素分析方法,即使用 106Cd-111Cd 双峰值。为了消除 114Sn 的等位干扰,我们将 113Cd 与 106Cd、110Cd 和 111Cd 结合使用,以获得 δ113/110Cd,然后将 δ114/110Cd 计算为 1.33 × δ113/110Cd。我们发现,当样品溶液中的锡/镉含量≤2.5 时,δ114/110Cd 值不受锡的影响,因为锡的作用是矩阵元素而不是等压干扰。镉同位素测量对稀释的 HNO3 摩尔或镉浓度不敏感。此外,当样品溶液中 Mo/Cd、Ni/Cd 和 Se/Cd 的浓度≤1 时,镉同位素测量不会受到明显影响。相反,当 Zn/Cd 为 0.1、In/Cd 为 0.05 和 Pd/Cd 为 5 × 10-3 时,测得的δ114/110Cd 值明显偏离零值。不过,Zn 和 In 可以完全消除,而且在任何镉洗脱液中都没有检测到 Pd。测量了三种标准溶液(Spex-CUGB、BAM I012 和 Münster)和四种地球化学参考材料(SGR-1b、BCR-2、GSD-7a 和 NIST 2711a)的δ114/110Cd 值,发现它们与已公布的结果非常接近(所有数据的 2SD 和范围分别小于 0.090 和 0.120)。这表明我们的双钉方法获得的数据是精确可靠的。此外,我们的新技术还有助于简化分离程序,从而节省时间并减少所需酸的用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信