Does enzymatic catalysis lead to more sustainable chemicals production? A life cycle sustainability assessment of isopropyl palmitate†

IF 9.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1039/d4gc04514a
Pieter Nachtergaele , Ozan Kocak , Yblin Roman Escobar , Jordy Motte , Dries Gabriels , Leopold Mottet , Jo Dewulf
{"title":"Does enzymatic catalysis lead to more sustainable chemicals production? A life cycle sustainability assessment of isopropyl palmitate†","authors":"Pieter Nachtergaele ,&nbsp;Ozan Kocak ,&nbsp;Yblin Roman Escobar ,&nbsp;Jordy Motte ,&nbsp;Dries Gabriels ,&nbsp;Leopold Mottet ,&nbsp;Jo Dewulf","doi":"10.1039/d4gc04514a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, a comprehensive Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is performed assessing environmental, economic and social impacts of switching from chemical to enzymatic catalysis for the esterification of Isopropyl palmitate (IPP). A dedicated LCSA methodology with a common goal, system boundary and life cycle inventory is presented. A 7 to 13% reduction in environmental impacts was found due to less hazardous waste formation, lower feedstock consumption and reduced steam usage. The social medium risk hours increase by 9% due to a longer production time, however, certain social benefits which were identified by stakeholder interviews, such as improved safety for workers, are not properly captured by the social impacts database used. Despite reductions in utility and feedstock costs, the total operating costs are higher (+40%) due to the immobilized enzyme cost and higher labour costs. Nevertheless, profitability indicators show that switching to enzymatic production is likely to be profitable. To reduce costs, optimization efforts should focus on reducing the batch time and increasing enzyme reuse. From a social and environmental perspective, upstream impacts linked to palmitic acid and isopropyl alcohol production should be addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":"26 23","pages":"Pages 11662-11672"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/gc/d4gc04514a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926224008719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, a comprehensive Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is performed assessing environmental, economic and social impacts of switching from chemical to enzymatic catalysis for the esterification of Isopropyl palmitate (IPP). A dedicated LCSA methodology with a common goal, system boundary and life cycle inventory is presented. A 7 to 13% reduction in environmental impacts was found due to less hazardous waste formation, lower feedstock consumption and reduced steam usage. The social medium risk hours increase by 9% due to a longer production time, however, certain social benefits which were identified by stakeholder interviews, such as improved safety for workers, are not properly captured by the social impacts database used. Despite reductions in utility and feedstock costs, the total operating costs are higher (+40%) due to the immobilized enzyme cost and higher labour costs. Nevertheless, profitability indicators show that switching to enzymatic production is likely to be profitable. To reduce costs, optimization efforts should focus on reducing the batch time and increasing enzyme reuse. From a social and environmental perspective, upstream impacts linked to palmitic acid and isopropyl alcohol production should be addressed.

Abstract Image

酶催化是否能带来更可持续的化学品生产?棕榈酸异丙酯的生命周期可持续性评估†
在这项工作中,对棕榈酸异丙酯(IPP)的酯化从化学催化转为酶催化进行了全面的生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA),评估了环境、经济和社会影响。介绍了一种具有共同目标、系统边界和生命周期清单的专用 LCSA 方法。由于减少了危险废物的形成、降低了原料消耗和蒸汽用量,对环境的影响减少了 7% 至 13%。由于生产时间延长,社会中等风险小时数增加了 9%,但是,利益相关者访谈中发现的某些社会效益,如改善工人的安全状况,并没有被所使用的社会影响数据库正确捕捉到。尽管公用事业成本和原料成本有所降低,但由于固定酶成本和劳动力成本的增加,总运营成本增加了(+40%)。不过,盈利指标显示,转用酶法生产很可能有利可图。为降低成本,优化工作应侧重于缩短批次时间和提高酶的重复利用率。从社会和环境角度来看,应解决与棕榈酸和异丙醇生产相关的上游影响问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信