Windthrow disturbance impacts soil biogeochemistry and bacterial communities in a temperate forest

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Bonnie G. Waring, Lena Lancastle, Thomas Bell, Martin I. Bidartondo, Pablo García-Díaz, Xavier Lambin, Elena Vanguelova, Francis A. Windram
{"title":"Windthrow disturbance impacts soil biogeochemistry and bacterial communities in a temperate forest","authors":"Bonnie G. Waring, Lena Lancastle, Thomas Bell, Martin I. Bidartondo, Pablo García-Díaz, Xavier Lambin, Elena Vanguelova, Francis A. Windram","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07086-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>Forests across the world are subject to disturbance via wind, wildfire, and pest and disease outbreaks. Yet we still have an incomplete understanding of how these stressors impact forest biota—particularly the soil microbes, which govern forest carbon and nutrient cycling.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Here, we investigated the impact of a severe windstorm on soil bacterial communities in Kielder Forest, a temperate coniferous forest in the north of England. Within ten individual sites, defined by common stand composition and topography, we established 50 m<sup>2</sup> plots in undisturbed stands, and in nearby stands that were moderately and/or severely disturbed by windthrow. Soils were sampled within each of the 22 study plots, and analysed for changes in carbon and nitrogen content, pH, root biomass, and bacterial community structure. We separately sequenced bacteria from bulk soils, rhizosphere soils, and root tissues to assess whether disturbance impacts varied based on the proximity of microbiota to tree roots.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Less than a year after the storm, we found that the most severely disturbed stands had lower canopy cover, lower soil carbon content, higher soil pH, and a smaller fine root biomass than the undisturbed stands. Disturbance also impacted bacterial community beta-diversity, but the effects were subtle and did not vary among assemblages in bulk vs. rhizosphere soils.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Impacts of aboveground disturbance on soil biogeochemistry can be significant, but soil bacterial communities are relatively well-buffered against these changes. However, altered patterns of root growth and carbon cycling may have longer-term implications for forest recovery after windthrow disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"188 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07086-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Forests across the world are subject to disturbance via wind, wildfire, and pest and disease outbreaks. Yet we still have an incomplete understanding of how these stressors impact forest biota—particularly the soil microbes, which govern forest carbon and nutrient cycling.

Methods

Here, we investigated the impact of a severe windstorm on soil bacterial communities in Kielder Forest, a temperate coniferous forest in the north of England. Within ten individual sites, defined by common stand composition and topography, we established 50 m2 plots in undisturbed stands, and in nearby stands that were moderately and/or severely disturbed by windthrow. Soils were sampled within each of the 22 study plots, and analysed for changes in carbon and nitrogen content, pH, root biomass, and bacterial community structure. We separately sequenced bacteria from bulk soils, rhizosphere soils, and root tissues to assess whether disturbance impacts varied based on the proximity of microbiota to tree roots.

Results

Less than a year after the storm, we found that the most severely disturbed stands had lower canopy cover, lower soil carbon content, higher soil pH, and a smaller fine root biomass than the undisturbed stands. Disturbance also impacted bacterial community beta-diversity, but the effects were subtle and did not vary among assemblages in bulk vs. rhizosphere soils.

Conclusions

Impacts of aboveground disturbance on soil biogeochemistry can be significant, but soil bacterial communities are relatively well-buffered against these changes. However, altered patterns of root growth and carbon cycling may have longer-term implications for forest recovery after windthrow disturbances.

风卷干扰影响温带森林的土壤生物地球化学和细菌群落
目的世界各地的森林都受到风、野火以及病虫害爆发的干扰。然而,我们对这些压力因素如何影响森林生物群落,尤其是影响森林碳和养分循环的土壤微生物,仍然缺乏全面的了解。在这里,我们研究了一场严重的暴风对英格兰北部温带针叶林基尔德森林土壤细菌群落的影响。在根据共同的林分组成和地形确定的十个地点中,我们在未受干扰的林分以及附近受风切中度和/或严重干扰的林分中建立了 50 平方米的地块。我们在 22 个研究地块中的每个地块内对土壤进行了取样,并分析了土壤中碳和氮含量、pH 值、根系生物量和细菌群落结构的变化。我们分别对大块土壤、根层土壤和根部组织中的细菌进行了测序,以评估干扰的影响是否因微生物群与树根的接近程度而有所不同。结果风暴过后不到一年,我们发现与未受干扰的林分相比,受干扰最严重的林分树冠覆盖率较低,土壤碳含量较低,土壤 pH 值较高,细根生物量较小。扰动也影响了细菌群落的β-多样性,但这种影响是微妙的,而且在主体土壤与根圈土壤中的细菌群落之间没有差异。然而,根系生长和碳循环模式的改变可能会对风刮扰动后的森林恢复产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信