Adaptation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen Scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties: a validity and reliability study.

Seda Aybüke Sarı, Ezgi Agadayı, Nurullah Çelik, Seher Karahan, Ayça Kömürlüoğlu, Esra Döğer
{"title":"Adaptation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen Scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties: a validity and reliability study.","authors":"Seda Aybüke Sarı, Ezgi Agadayı, Nurullah Çelik, Seher Karahan, Ayça Kömürlüoğlu, Esra Döğer","doi":"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is quite challenging for both adolescents and their families. In this study, we aimed to translate the 14-item Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen (PAID-T) scale, which measures variables that influence diabetes distress, to Turkish and investigate the Turkish version's reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-four adolescents with T1DM participated in the study. PAID-T and forms for sociodemographic and diabetes characteristics were used for data collection. The scale's content validity was checked using the Davis technique. Cronbach's α was used to analyze the scale's internal reliability and the test-retest for the scale's reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was utilized to examine the factor structure. The fit of the scale was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 54.6% (n=106) were girls. The content validity index values of the scale items ranged between 0.86 and 1.0. The PAID-T scores of girls and boys were similar. No significant difference was found between PAID-T scores with sociodemographic data and diabetes characteristics (p>0.05). The test-retest correlation coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.952. The three-factor (emotional burden, family and friend distress, and regimen-specific distress) model identified in EFA explained 61.8% of the common variance. Fit analysis was performed using CFA for the three-factor model, which did not show adequate fit (x2/df = 2.402, GFI = 0.822, CFI = 0.815, NFI = 0.727, NNFI = 0.772, RMSEA = 0.118). The Cronbach α value of the scale was 0.864.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the 14-item PAID-T showed moderate validity and strong reliability. Accordingly, it can be used as a reliable measurement tool to assess diabetes stress in adolescents with T1DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":101314,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","volume":"66 5","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is quite challenging for both adolescents and their families. In this study, we aimed to translate the 14-item Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen (PAID-T) scale, which measures variables that influence diabetes distress, to Turkish and investigate the Turkish version's reliability and validity.

Methods: One hundred and ninety-four adolescents with T1DM participated in the study. PAID-T and forms for sociodemographic and diabetes characteristics were used for data collection. The scale's content validity was checked using the Davis technique. Cronbach's α was used to analyze the scale's internal reliability and the test-retest for the scale's reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was utilized to examine the factor structure. The fit of the scale was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: Of the participants, 54.6% (n=106) were girls. The content validity index values of the scale items ranged between 0.86 and 1.0. The PAID-T scores of girls and boys were similar. No significant difference was found between PAID-T scores with sociodemographic data and diabetes characteristics (p>0.05). The test-retest correlation coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.952. The three-factor (emotional burden, family and friend distress, and regimen-specific distress) model identified in EFA explained 61.8% of the common variance. Fit analysis was performed using CFA for the three-factor model, which did not show adequate fit (x2/df = 2.402, GFI = 0.822, CFI = 0.815, NFI = 0.727, NNFI = 0.772, RMSEA = 0.118). The Cronbach α value of the scale was 0.864.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the 14-item PAID-T showed moderate validity and strong reliability. Accordingly, it can be used as a reliable measurement tool to assess diabetes stress in adolescents with T1DM.

将 "青少年糖尿病问题领域量表 "改编成土耳其语并检验其心理测量特性:有效性和可靠性研究。
目的:1型糖尿病(T1DM)的管理对青少年及其家庭来说都是一项挑战。在这项研究中,我们旨在将测量影响糖尿病困扰的变量的 14 个项目的青少年糖尿病问题领域(PAID-T)量表翻译成土耳其语,并调查土耳其语版本的可靠性和有效性:194名患有T1DM的青少年参加了研究。收集数据时使用了 PAID-T 以及社会人口学和糖尿病特征表。量表的内容效度采用戴维斯技术进行检验。Cronbach's α 用于分析量表的内部信度,测试-再测用于分析量表的信度。探索性因子分析(EFA)用于研究因子结构。结果:在参与者中,54.6%(n=106)为女生。量表项目的内容效度指数介于 0.86 和 1.0 之间。女孩和男孩的 PAID-T 分数相似。PAID-T得分与社会人口学数据和糖尿病特征之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。量表的重测相关系数为 0.952。在 EFA 中确定的三因素(情绪负担、亲友困扰和特定疗程困扰)模型解释了 61.8% 的共同方差。使用 CFA 对三因素模型进行了拟合分析,结果显示拟合度不够(x2/df = 2.402,GFI = 0.822,CFI = 0.815,NFI = 0.727,NNFI = 0.772,RMSEA = 0.118)。量表的 Cronbach α 值为 0.864:14个项目的PAID-T土耳其版显示出中等程度的有效性和较高的可靠性。因此,该量表可作为一种可靠的测量工具,用于评估患有 T1DM 的青少年的糖尿病压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信