Improving processing fluency to encourage family health information seeking: The mediating role of communication efficacy.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rachel Wade, Ji Youn Ryu, Hillary Shulman, Shelly Hovick
{"title":"Improving processing fluency to encourage family health information seeking: The mediating role of communication efficacy.","authors":"Rachel Wade, Ji Youn Ryu, Hillary Shulman, Shelly Hovick","doi":"10.1177/13591053241294116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing from the metacognitive literature, this experimental study examines how the relative ease of retrieving information (i.e. processing fluency) impacts individuals' efficacy about engaging in family health discussions and interpersonal information seeking intention across two health topics: family organ donation status and family health history. Participants (<i>N</i> = 609) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Those in the easy retrieval task condition (versus a difficult or no task control), who were asked to recall information regarding two (versus six or zero) family members, reported greater processing fluency. Moreover, those who reported greater fluency also reported higher communication efficacy, and a greater intention to seek out family health information. Practically, this study highlights how metacognitive strategies may be used in healthcare settings to motivate patient information seeking. For example, it may be advantageous to start by collecting information for relatively few diseases/family members and slowly build a family history over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053241294116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241294116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing from the metacognitive literature, this experimental study examines how the relative ease of retrieving information (i.e. processing fluency) impacts individuals' efficacy about engaging in family health discussions and interpersonal information seeking intention across two health topics: family organ donation status and family health history. Participants (N = 609) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Those in the easy retrieval task condition (versus a difficult or no task control), who were asked to recall information regarding two (versus six or zero) family members, reported greater processing fluency. Moreover, those who reported greater fluency also reported higher communication efficacy, and a greater intention to seek out family health information. Practically, this study highlights how metacognitive strategies may be used in healthcare settings to motivate patient information seeking. For example, it may be advantageous to start by collecting information for relatively few diseases/family members and slowly build a family history over time.

提高处理信息的流畅性以鼓励家庭寻求健康信息:沟通效能的中介作用。
本实验研究借鉴元认知文献,探讨了检索信息的相对难易程度(即处理流畅度)如何影响个人参与家庭健康讨论的效率,以及在家庭器官捐献状况和家庭健康史这两个健康主题上的人际信息搜寻意向。参与者(N = 609)被随机分配到三种条件之一。在简单检索任务条件下(与困难或无任务对照组相比),被要求回忆两个(与六个或零个)家庭成员信息的参与者报告了更高的处理流畅度。此外,那些报告流畅度更高的人还报告了更高的沟通效率,以及寻求家庭健康信息的更大意愿。实际上,这项研究强调了如何在医疗保健环境中使用元认知策略来激励病人寻求信息。例如,从收集相对较少疾病/家庭成员的信息开始,随着时间的推移慢慢建立家族病史,这可能会有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信