Automatic Segmentation of Quadriceps Femoris Cross-Sectional Area in Ultrasound Images: Development and Validation of Convolutional Neural Networks in People With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Surgery

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Beyza Tayfur , Paul Ritsche , Olivia Sunderlik , Madison Wheeler , Eric Ramirez , Jacob Leuteneker , Oliver Faude , Martino V. Franchi , Alexa K. Johnson , Riann Palmieri-Smith
{"title":"Automatic Segmentation of Quadriceps Femoris Cross-Sectional Area in Ultrasound Images: Development and Validation of Convolutional Neural Networks in People With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Surgery","authors":"Beyza Tayfur ,&nbsp;Paul Ritsche ,&nbsp;Olivia Sunderlik ,&nbsp;Madison Wheeler ,&nbsp;Eric Ramirez ,&nbsp;Jacob Leuteneker ,&nbsp;Oliver Faude ,&nbsp;Martino V. Franchi ,&nbsp;Alexa K. Johnson ,&nbsp;Riann Palmieri-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Deep learning approaches such as DeepACSA enable automated segmentation of muscle ultrasound cross-sectional area (CSA). Although they provide fast and accurate results, most are developed using data from healthy populations. The changes in muscle size and quality following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury challenges the validity of these automated approaches in the ACL population. Quadriceps muscle CSA is an important outcome following ACL injury; therefore, our aim was to validate DeepACSA, a convolutional neural network (CNN) approach for ACL injury.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Quadriceps panoramic CSA ultrasound images (vastus lateralis [VL] <em>n =</em> 430, rectus femoris [RF] <em>n =</em> 349, and vastus medialis [VM] <em>n =</em> 723) from 124 participants with an ACL injury (age 22.8 ± 7.9 y, 61 females) were used to train CNN models. For VL and RF, combined models included extra images from healthy participants (<em>n =</em> 153, age 38.2, range 13–78) that the DeepACSA was developed from. All models were tested on unseen external validation images (<em>n =</em> 100) from ACL-injured participants. Model predicted CSA results were compared to manual segmentation results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All models showed good comparability (ICC &gt; 0.81, &lt; 14.1% standard error of measurement, mean differences of &lt;1.56 cm<sup>2</sup>) to manual segmentation. Removal of the erroneous predictions resulted in excellent comparability (ICC &gt; 0.94, &lt; 7.40% standard error of measurement, mean differences of &lt;0.57 cm<sup>2</sup>). Erroneous predictions were 17% for combined VL, 11% for combined RF, and 20% for ACL-only VM models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The new CNN models provided can be used in ACL-injured populations to measure CSA of VL, RF, and VM muscles automatically. The models yield high comparability to manual segmentation results and reduce the burden of manual segmentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 2","pages":"Pages 364-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Deep learning approaches such as DeepACSA enable automated segmentation of muscle ultrasound cross-sectional area (CSA). Although they provide fast and accurate results, most are developed using data from healthy populations. The changes in muscle size and quality following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury challenges the validity of these automated approaches in the ACL population. Quadriceps muscle CSA is an important outcome following ACL injury; therefore, our aim was to validate DeepACSA, a convolutional neural network (CNN) approach for ACL injury.

Methods

Quadriceps panoramic CSA ultrasound images (vastus lateralis [VL] n = 430, rectus femoris [RF] n = 349, and vastus medialis [VM] n = 723) from 124 participants with an ACL injury (age 22.8 ± 7.9 y, 61 females) were used to train CNN models. For VL and RF, combined models included extra images from healthy participants (n = 153, age 38.2, range 13–78) that the DeepACSA was developed from. All models were tested on unseen external validation images (n = 100) from ACL-injured participants. Model predicted CSA results were compared to manual segmentation results.

Results

All models showed good comparability (ICC > 0.81, < 14.1% standard error of measurement, mean differences of <1.56 cm2) to manual segmentation. Removal of the erroneous predictions resulted in excellent comparability (ICC > 0.94, < 7.40% standard error of measurement, mean differences of <0.57 cm2). Erroneous predictions were 17% for combined VL, 11% for combined RF, and 20% for ACL-only VM models.

Conclusion

The new CNN models provided can be used in ACL-injured populations to measure CSA of VL, RF, and VM muscles automatically. The models yield high comparability to manual segmentation results and reduce the burden of manual segmentation.
超声图像中股四头肌横截面区的自动分割:在前十字韧带损伤和手术患者中开发和验证卷积神经网络。
目的:DeepACSA 等深度学习方法可自动分割肌肉超声截面积(CSA)。虽然这些方法能提供快速、准确的结果,但它们大多是利用健康人群的数据开发的。前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后肌肉大小和质量的变化对这些自动方法在 ACL 群体中的有效性提出了挑战。股四头肌CSA是前交叉韧带损伤后的一个重要结果;因此,我们的目的是验证卷积神经网络(CNN)方法DeepACSA在前交叉韧带损伤中的有效性:我们使用 124 名前交叉韧带损伤患者(年龄 22.8 ± 7.9 岁,61 名女性)的股四头肌全景 CSA 超声波图像(外侧肌 [VL] n = 430,股直肌 [RF] n = 349,内侧肌 [VM] n = 723)来训练 CNN 模型。对于 VL 和 RF,综合模型包含了来自健康参与者(n = 153,年龄 38.2,范围 13-78)的额外图像,DeepACSA 就是根据这些图像开发的。所有模型都在前交叉韧带损伤参与者的未见外部验证图像(n = 100)上进行了测试。将模型预测的 CSA 结果与人工分割结果进行比较:结果:所有模型都显示出与人工分割结果良好的可比性(ICC > 0.81,测量标准误差 < 14.1%,平均差为 2)。去除错误预测后,可比性极佳(ICC > 0.94,< 7.40% 标准测量误差,平均差为 2)。综合 VL 预测错误率为 17%,综合 RF 预测错误率为 11%,纯 ACL VM 模型预测错误率为 20%:新的 CNN 模型可用于前交叉韧带损伤人群,自动测量 VL、RF 和 VM 肌肉的 CSA。这些模型与人工分割结果具有很高的可比性,并减轻了人工分割的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信