"You sure she's not making this up?": A qualitative investigation of stigma toward adults with borderline personality disorder in physical healthcare settings.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Kellyann M Navarre
{"title":"\"You sure she's not making this up?\": A qualitative investigation of stigma toward adults with borderline personality disorder in physical healthcare settings.","authors":"Kellyann M Navarre","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with pervasive stigma that contributes to several consequences, such as inaccessible and inadequate healthcare. Existing literature concerning the experiences of BPD stigma within healthcare settings predominantly centers on mental healthcare contexts. However, individuals with BPD also present with elevated physical disabilities and health concerns, demonstrating a need for regular contact with medical professionals to manage and coordinate physical healthcare. The current qualitative study analyzes the dynamics of stigma and consequences in medical settings for physical healthcare among individuals diagnosed with BPD. Community adults (N = 16, M<sub>age</sub> = 29.50, 44% cisgender women) provided qualitative responses describing their experiences with stigma in medical settings other than for mental health purposes. The inductive thematic analysis generated six key themes: (1) Dismissal and Misattribution of Physical Symptoms, (2) Delayed or Inappropriate Medical Diagnosis and Intervention, (3) Communication and Advocacy Challenges, (4) Invalidation of Emotional Well-Being and Distress, (5) Self-Harm Stigma, and (6) Presumed Drug-Seeking Behavior. This article demonstrates the persistent and complex role of stigma across physical healthcare settings for individuals with BPD, affecting their physical and mental healthcare outcomes. It also identifies areas for future research and improvement and offers insights to ameliorate these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"e1646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with pervasive stigma that contributes to several consequences, such as inaccessible and inadequate healthcare. Existing literature concerning the experiences of BPD stigma within healthcare settings predominantly centers on mental healthcare contexts. However, individuals with BPD also present with elevated physical disabilities and health concerns, demonstrating a need for regular contact with medical professionals to manage and coordinate physical healthcare. The current qualitative study analyzes the dynamics of stigma and consequences in medical settings for physical healthcare among individuals diagnosed with BPD. Community adults (N = 16, Mage = 29.50, 44% cisgender women) provided qualitative responses describing their experiences with stigma in medical settings other than for mental health purposes. The inductive thematic analysis generated six key themes: (1) Dismissal and Misattribution of Physical Symptoms, (2) Delayed or Inappropriate Medical Diagnosis and Intervention, (3) Communication and Advocacy Challenges, (4) Invalidation of Emotional Well-Being and Distress, (5) Self-Harm Stigma, and (6) Presumed Drug-Seeking Behavior. This article demonstrates the persistent and complex role of stigma across physical healthcare settings for individuals with BPD, affecting their physical and mental healthcare outcomes. It also identifies areas for future research and improvement and offers insights to ameliorate these issues.

"你确定这不是她编造的?在医疗机构中对患有边缘型人格障碍的成年人的污名化定性调查。
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与普遍存在的耻辱感有关,这种耻辱感造成了一些后果,如无法获得医疗保健服务和医疗保健服务不足。有关 BPD 在医疗保健环境中的污名化经历的现有文献主要集中在精神医疗保健方面。然而,BPD 患者的身体残疾和健康问题也很严重,这表明他们需要定期与医疗专业人员联系,以管理和协调身体保健。本定性研究分析了在医疗环境中,被诊断为 BPD 的患者在身体保健方面的污名化动态及后果。社区成年人(N = 16,Mage = 29.50,44% 为顺性性别女性)提供了定性回答,描述了他们在非精神健康目的的医疗环境中遭受污名化的经历。归纳式主题分析产生了六个关键主题:(1)对身体症状的轻视和错误归因;(2)延迟或不恰当的医疗诊断和干预;(3)沟通和宣传方面的挑战;(4)情感健康和痛苦的无效化;(5)自残污名化;以及(6)假定的药物寻求行为。这篇文章表明,对于患有 BPD 的个人而言,污名化在各种身体保健环境中发挥着持久而复杂的作用,影响着他们的身体和心理保健结果。文章还指出了未来研究和改进的领域,并提出了改善这些问题的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信