Changes in Patient Safety Knowledge During Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Scoping Review Protocol.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Yuri Sacardo, Rodrigo Soares Ribeiro, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Emerson Roberto Dos Santos, Marcos Sanches Rodrigues, André Bavaresco Gonçalves Cristóvão, Nathalia Bavaresco Gonçalves Cristóvão, Helena Landim Gonçalves Cristóvão, Alexandre Lins Werneck, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Ana Caroline Santos Costa, Emilia Batista Mourão Tiol, Isabela Amaral Almeida Bistafa, Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes, Marli Carvalho Jerico, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta, Marielza Regina Ismael Martins, Clemente Neves Sousa, Tiago Filipe Cardoso Oliveira Casaleiro, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Alba Regina de Abreu Lima, Rita Cássia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro, Júlio César Andre
{"title":"Changes in Patient Safety Knowledge During Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Scoping Review Protocol.","authors":"João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Yuri Sacardo, Rodrigo Soares Ribeiro, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Emerson Roberto Dos Santos, Marcos Sanches Rodrigues, André Bavaresco Gonçalves Cristóvão, Nathalia Bavaresco Gonçalves Cristóvão, Helena Landim Gonçalves Cristóvão, Alexandre Lins Werneck, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Ana Caroline Santos Costa, Emilia Batista Mourão Tiol, Isabela Amaral Almeida Bistafa, Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes, Marli Carvalho Jerico, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta, Marielza Regina Ismael Martins, Clemente Neves Sousa, Tiago Filipe Cardoso Oliveira Casaleiro, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Alba Regina de Abreu Lima, Rita Cássia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro, Júlio César Andre","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Patient safety is a critical component of healthcare quality, yet there remains a significant gap in understanding how patient safety knowledge progresses among nursing students throughout their educational journey. This scoping review aims to map and analyze the existing literature on the development of patient safety knowledge in undergraduate nursing education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed across multiple databases, including CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. The review will include studies published from 2019 to 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data will be synthesized narratively, with quantitative data summarized using descriptive statistics and qualitative data analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review is expected to identify key patterns in the progression of patient safety knowledge among nursing students, including critical periods for knowledge acquisition, challenges in translating theoretical knowledge into practice, and effective educational strategies. The findings will be presented in both tabular and narrative forms, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of patient safety education in nursing programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anticipated outcomes of this review have significant implications for nursing education, healthcare policy, and clinical practice. For educators, the findings will inform curriculum development and the design of targeted interventions to enhance patient safety competencies. From a policy perspective, the results could support the standardization of patient safety education across nursing programs. In clinical practice, the study may emphasize the importance of continuous professional development in patient safety. This scoping review aims to fill a critical gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive understanding of how patient safety knowledge progresses among nursing students. The findings are expected to contribute significantly to the advancement of nursing education and patient safety, ultimately fostering a culture of safety that benefits both healthcare providers and recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3643-3651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Patient safety is a critical component of healthcare quality, yet there remains a significant gap in understanding how patient safety knowledge progresses among nursing students throughout their educational journey. This scoping review aims to map and analyze the existing literature on the development of patient safety knowledge in undergraduate nursing education.

Methods: This study will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed across multiple databases, including CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. The review will include studies published from 2019 to 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data will be synthesized narratively, with quantitative data summarized using descriptive statistics and qualitative data analyzed thematically.

Results: The review is expected to identify key patterns in the progression of patient safety knowledge among nursing students, including critical periods for knowledge acquisition, challenges in translating theoretical knowledge into practice, and effective educational strategies. The findings will be presented in both tabular and narrative forms, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of patient safety education in nursing programs.

Conclusions: The anticipated outcomes of this review have significant implications for nursing education, healthcare policy, and clinical practice. For educators, the findings will inform curriculum development and the design of targeted interventions to enhance patient safety competencies. From a policy perspective, the results could support the standardization of patient safety education across nursing programs. In clinical practice, the study may emphasize the importance of continuous professional development in patient safety. This scoping review aims to fill a critical gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive understanding of how patient safety knowledge progresses among nursing students. The findings are expected to contribute significantly to the advancement of nursing education and patient safety, ultimately fostering a culture of safety that benefits both healthcare providers and recipients.

本科护理教育期间患者安全知识的变化:范围审查协议》。
背景/目的:患者安全是医疗质量的重要组成部分,但在了解护理专业学生在整个教育过程中如何掌握患者安全知识方面仍存在很大差距。本范围综述旨在绘制和分析有关本科护理教育中患者安全知识发展的现有文献:本研究将遵循乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定综述方法,并遵守 PRISMA-ScR(系统综述和荟萃分析-范围界定综述的首选报告项目)指南。我们将在多个数据库中采用全面的检索策略,包括 CINAHL(护理和专职医疗文献累积索引)、ERIC(教育资源信息中心)、PubMed、Embase、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science。综述将包括 2019 年至 2024 年期间用英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语发表的研究。两名独立审稿人将进行研究选择和数据提取。将对数据进行叙述性综合,使用描述性统计对定量数据进行总结,并对定性数据进行专题分析:预计综述将确定护理专业学生在学习患者安全知识过程中的主要模式,包括知识获取的关键时期、将理论知识转化为实践的挑战以及有效的教育策略。研究结果将以表格和叙述的形式呈现,全面概述护理专业患者安全教育的现状:本综述的预期成果对护理教育、医疗保健政策和临床实践具有重要意义。对于教育者而言,研究结果将为课程开发和设计有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以提高患者安全能力。从政策角度来看,研究结果可以支持护理专业患者安全教育的标准化。在临床实践中,该研究可强调患者安全方面持续专业发展的重要性。本范围综述旨在通过全面了解护理专业学生如何掌握患者安全知识,填补文献中的重要空白。预计研究结果将极大地促进护理教育和患者安全的发展,最终促进安全文化的形成,使医疗服务提供者和接受者都能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信