Wearable Light Loggers in Field Conditions: Corneal Light Characteristics, User Compliance, and Acceptance.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Oliver Stefani, Reto Marek, Jürg Schwarz, Sina Plate, Johannes Zauner, Björn Schrader
{"title":"Wearable Light Loggers in Field Conditions: Corneal Light Characteristics, User Compliance, and Acceptance.","authors":"Oliver Stefani, Reto Marek, Jürg Schwarz, Sina Plate, Johannes Zauner, Björn Schrader","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep6040042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding user challenges with light dosimeters is crucial for designing more acceptable devices and advancing light exposure research. We systematically evaluated the usability and acceptability of a light dosimeter (lido) with 29 participants who wore the dosimeter near the corneal plane of the eye for 5 days. Common reasons for not wearing the dosimeter included exercise, recharging, wet environments, public places, and discomfort. Despite these issues, participants adhered to using the dosimeter with high compliance (89% of recording time). Our findings revealed a significant discrepancy between mean (300 lx<sub>mEDI</sub>) and median (51 lx<sub>mEDI</sub>) melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance. This discrepancy indicates that the participants were exposed to significantly lower light levels most of the time. Specifically, participants were exposed to light levels above 250 lx<sub>mEDI</sub> for only 14% of their wearing time. This highlights the need for increased exposure to recommended light levels. In the evening, participants were exposed to less than the recommended 10 lx<sub>mEDI</sub> for 58% of their wearing time, which is in line with the guidelines for reducing light exposure before sleep. This study highlights the urgent need for strategies to increase daily light exposure that are more in line with circadian health recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"6 4","pages":"619-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep6040042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding user challenges with light dosimeters is crucial for designing more acceptable devices and advancing light exposure research. We systematically evaluated the usability and acceptability of a light dosimeter (lido) with 29 participants who wore the dosimeter near the corneal plane of the eye for 5 days. Common reasons for not wearing the dosimeter included exercise, recharging, wet environments, public places, and discomfort. Despite these issues, participants adhered to using the dosimeter with high compliance (89% of recording time). Our findings revealed a significant discrepancy between mean (300 lxmEDI) and median (51 lxmEDI) melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance. This discrepancy indicates that the participants were exposed to significantly lower light levels most of the time. Specifically, participants were exposed to light levels above 250 lxmEDI for only 14% of their wearing time. This highlights the need for increased exposure to recommended light levels. In the evening, participants were exposed to less than the recommended 10 lxmEDI for 58% of their wearing time, which is in line with the guidelines for reducing light exposure before sleep. This study highlights the urgent need for strategies to increase daily light exposure that are more in line with circadian health recommendations.

现场条件下的可穿戴式光线记录仪:角膜光特性、用户服从性和接受度。
了解用户在使用光剂量计时遇到的挑战对于设计更易于接受的设备和推进光照射研究至关重要。我们对光剂量计(lido)的可用性和可接受性进行了系统评估,29 名参与者在眼睛角膜平面附近佩戴了 5 天剂量计。不佩戴剂量计的常见原因包括运动、充电、潮湿环境、公共场所和不适。尽管存在这些问题,但参与者坚持使用剂量计的依从性很高(89% 的记录时间)。我们的研究结果表明,平均值(300 lxmEDI)与中位数(51 lxmEDI)之间存在明显差异。这一差异表明,参与者大部分时间暴露在明显较低的光照水平下。具体来说,参与者只有 14% 的佩戴时间暴露在 250 lxmEDI 以上的光照水平下。这突出表明,有必要增加暴露于建议光照度的时间。在傍晚,58%的佩戴者暴露在低于建议的 10 lxmEDI 的光照下,这符合减少睡前光照的指导方针。这项研究强调,迫切需要制定更符合昼夜节律健康建议的策略来增加每天的光照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信