Evaluation of Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Naoyuki Miyashita, Futoshi Higa, Yosuke Aoki, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Masafumi Seki, Kazuhiro Tateda, Nobuko Maki, Kazuhiro Uchino, Hiroshi Kiyota, Akira Watanabe
{"title":"Evaluation of Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia.","authors":"Naoyuki Miyashita, Futoshi Higa, Yosuke Aoki, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Masafumi Seki, Kazuhiro Tateda, Nobuko Maki, Kazuhiro Uchino, Hiroshi Kiyota, Akira Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.jiac.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Legionella pneumonia is an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) pneumonia guideline 2024 proposed use of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score for the management of CAP in adults. The committee for the JRS pneumonia guideline is required to verify the validity of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score for the next revision. In addition, it is necessary to determine appropriate cutoff scores by examining all pneumonia cases. In the present study, we validated the usefulness of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score using SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP. We analyzed 116 patients with L. pneumophila CAP and 947 patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP. Among Omicron cases, the median Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score was identical among BA.1, BA.2, BA.5, XBB lineage, BA.2.86 and JN.1 subvariants. The median Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP group (4 vs 1, p<0.0001). When targeting all 947 patients with Omicron subvariants, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila CAP were 90.5% and 90.8%, respectively, when a total score ≥ 3 points was set as the cutoff level. When the cutoff score was ≥ 4 points, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila CAP were 76.7% and 99.6%, respectively. Our results demonstrated that the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score had good diagnostic ability during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant epidemic period. To set optimal indicators and cutoff values for the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score, the policy of the committee for the JRS pneumonia guideline is to continue testing for all pneumonia types.</p>","PeriodicalId":16103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2024.11.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legionella pneumonia is an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) pneumonia guideline 2024 proposed use of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score for the management of CAP in adults. The committee for the JRS pneumonia guideline is required to verify the validity of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score for the next revision. In addition, it is necessary to determine appropriate cutoff scores by examining all pneumonia cases. In the present study, we validated the usefulness of the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score using SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP. We analyzed 116 patients with L. pneumophila CAP and 947 patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP. Among Omicron cases, the median Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score was identical among BA.1, BA.2, BA.5, XBB lineage, BA.2.86 and JN.1 subvariants. The median Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score was significantly higher in the L. pneumophila CAP group than the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP group (4 vs 1, p<0.0001). When targeting all 947 patients with Omicron subvariants, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila CAP were 90.5% and 90.8%, respectively, when a total score ≥ 3 points was set as the cutoff level. When the cutoff score was ≥ 4 points, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for presumptive diagnosis of L. pneumophila CAP were 76.7% and 99.6%, respectively. Our results demonstrated that the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score had good diagnostic ability during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant epidemic period. To set optimal indicators and cutoff values for the Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score, the policy of the committee for the JRS pneumonia guideline is to continue testing for all pneumonia types.

评估 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron 肺炎患者的军团菌诊断预测评分。
军团菌肺炎是社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的重要病因。日本呼吸学会(JRS)肺炎指南 2024 建议将军团菌诊断预测评分用于成人 CAP 的治疗。日本呼吸学会肺炎指南委员会需要在下一次修订时验证军团菌诊断预测评分的有效性。此外,有必要通过检查所有肺炎病例来确定适当的临界分数。在本研究中,我们使用 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP 验证了军团菌诊断预测评分的实用性。我们分析了 116 例嗜肺军团菌 CAP 患者和 947 例 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP 患者。在 Omicron 病例中,BA.1、BA.2、BA.5、XBB 系、BA.2.86 和 JN.1 亚变异株的军团菌诊断预测得分中位数相同。嗜肺军团菌 CAP 组的军团菌诊断预测得分中位数明显高于 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron CAP 组(4 vs 1,p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (JIC) — official journal of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases — welcomes original papers, laboratory or clinical, as well as case reports, notes, committee reports, surveillance and guidelines from all parts of the world on all aspects of chemotherapy, covering the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, including treatment with anticancer drugs. Experimental studies on animal models and pharmacokinetics, and reports on epidemiology and clinical trials are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信