Alpha-Delta Ratio for Detection of Cerebral Injury and Stroke in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arnold J Sansevere, Melissa L DiBacco, Kelly Cavan, Alexander Rotenberg
{"title":"Alpha-Delta Ratio for Detection of Cerebral Injury and Stroke in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Arnold J Sansevere, Melissa L DiBacco, Kelly Cavan, Alexander Rotenberg","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess the alpha-delta ratio (ADR) as a biomarker for cerebral injury and stroke in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of children aged >44 weeks gestation to 21 years monitored with continuous electroencephalography during ECMO. The interhemispheric ADR difference between the left and right hemisphere was calculated per hour. A t-test was performed comparing the mean interhemispheric difference between controls and patients with cerebral injury at set intervals (i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours) from the start of continuous electroencephalography. Injury was established if confirmed by imaging on the same day as ECMO cannulation and acquired if confirmed the day after ECMO or later. Analysis of variance was performed to compare the mean interhemispheric difference in the ADR among control patients to those with early-acquired and late-acquired injury at 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 49 patients with a median age of 3.4 years (interquartile range [1-10.4]), 47% (23/49) were male, and 73% (36/49) had cardiac arrest. Cerebrovascular injury was detected in 45% (22/49), with focal stroke in 82% (18/22). A significant difference was seen between control patients compared with cerebrovascular injury after 6 hours of continuous electroencephalography (0.016 vs. 0.042) (mean interhemispheric ADR difference) (P = 0.03). Analysis of variance of control patients to early- and late-acquired injury at 24 hours showed a significant difference (P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADR is a reliable metric to detect in-ECMO cerebral injury and stroke. Further study is needed to automate and assess this metric for real-time detection of stroke in ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the alpha-delta ratio (ADR) as a biomarker for cerebral injury and stroke in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods: Retrospective study of children aged >44 weeks gestation to 21 years monitored with continuous electroencephalography during ECMO. The interhemispheric ADR difference between the left and right hemisphere was calculated per hour. A t-test was performed comparing the mean interhemispheric difference between controls and patients with cerebral injury at set intervals (i.e., 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours) from the start of continuous electroencephalography. Injury was established if confirmed by imaging on the same day as ECMO cannulation and acquired if confirmed the day after ECMO or later. Analysis of variance was performed to compare the mean interhemispheric difference in the ADR among control patients to those with early-acquired and late-acquired injury at 24 hours.

Results: We included 49 patients with a median age of 3.4 years (interquartile range [1-10.4]), 47% (23/49) were male, and 73% (36/49) had cardiac arrest. Cerebrovascular injury was detected in 45% (22/49), with focal stroke in 82% (18/22). A significant difference was seen between control patients compared with cerebrovascular injury after 6 hours of continuous electroencephalography (0.016 vs. 0.042) (mean interhemispheric ADR difference) (P = 0.03). Analysis of variance of control patients to early- and late-acquired injury at 24 hours showed a significant difference (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: The ADR is a reliable metric to detect in-ECMO cerebral injury and stroke. Further study is needed to automate and assess this metric for real-time detection of stroke in ECMO.

用于检测小儿体外膜氧合过程中脑损伤和中风的α-δ比值
简介:目的:评估α-δ比值(ADR)作为小儿体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者脑损伤和中风的生物标志物:评估α-δ比值(ADR)作为小儿体外膜氧合(ECMO)中脑损伤和中风的生物标志物:方法:对妊娠 >44 周至 21 岁的儿童进行回顾性研究,在 ECMO 期间使用连续脑电图进行监测。计算每小时左右半球间的 ADR 差异。对对照组和脑损伤患者在连续脑电图检查开始后的设定时间间隔(即 1、3、6、9、12 和 24 小时)的半球间平均差异进行 t 检验。如果在 ECMO 插管的同一天通过成像确认脑损伤,则确定为脑损伤;如果在 ECMO 的第二天或更晚些时候确认脑损伤,则为获得脑损伤。我们进行了方差分析,以比较对照组患者与 24 小时内早期获得性和晚期获得性损伤患者的 ADR 平均半球间差异:我们共收治了 49 名患者,中位年龄为 3.4 岁(四分位数间距 [1-10.4]),47%(23/49)为男性,73%(36/49)为心脏骤停患者。45%(22/49)的患者发现脑血管损伤,82%(18/22)的患者发现局灶性中风。在连续脑电图检查 6 小时后,对照组患者与脑血管损伤患者之间的差异明显(0.016 对 0.042)(半球间 ADR 平均值差异)(P = 0.03)。对照组患者在24小时后与早期和晚期获得性损伤的方差分析显示有显著差异(P = 0.03):ADR是检测ECMO内脑损伤和中风的可靠指标。结论:ADR 是检测 ECMO 中脑损伤和脑卒中的可靠指标,需要进一步研究将该指标自动化并对其进行评估,以实时检测 ECMO 中的脑卒中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信