Beyond intensity: A commentary on stretch-induced hypoalgesia

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Zhu Binbin, Zhao Rui, Huang Changshun, Zhang Yiwei
{"title":"Beyond intensity: A commentary on stretch-induced hypoalgesia","authors":"Zhu Binbin,&nbsp;Zhao Rui,&nbsp;Huang Changshun,&nbsp;Zhang Yiwei","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the recent study by Støve et al., examining stretching intensity and pain sensitivity which demonstrated that both low- and high-intensity stretching produced similar hypoalgesic effects (Støve et al., <span>2024</span>). This finding raises two important questions: Why would anyone need to perform high-intensity stretching if lower intensities achieve comparable pain modulation? And more fundamentally, how does body position—a question raised by Apostolopoulos et al. almost 10 years ago (Apostolopoulos et al., <span>2015</span>) still unanswered—influence these stretching effects?</p><p>Their results showed that stretching exercises activate ‘endogenous modulation of somatosensory input’, with more pronounced effects at regional sites compared to distant sites. While their standardized protocol using a seated position in the Biodex system provided good experimental control, it may limit generalizability to clinical practice where stretching is performed in various positions. The interaction between body position, gravitational effects and pain modulation pathways could significantly influence both local and systemic responses (Cooper et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>The clinical implications extend beyond simple stretching exercises. Traditional movement practices like yoga and Chinese exercises (e.g. Baduanjin) incorporate various stretching intensities, potentially activating similar pain-modulating pathways (Wang et al., <span>2021</span>). Understanding whether the intensity-independent hypoalgesic effect holds true across different positions and delivery methods would advance therapeutic applications. This is particularly relevant given that the mechanical loading and proprioceptive input may vary significantly with body position.</p><p>These findings could guide clinicians in prescribing stretching exercises, suggesting that gentler approaches might be equally effective for pain management. However, future research should examine not only the effects in diverse populations but also how different body positions might influence stretching intensity and subsequent pain modulation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.4759","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with great interest the recent study by Støve et al., examining stretching intensity and pain sensitivity which demonstrated that both low- and high-intensity stretching produced similar hypoalgesic effects (Støve et al., 2024). This finding raises two important questions: Why would anyone need to perform high-intensity stretching if lower intensities achieve comparable pain modulation? And more fundamentally, how does body position—a question raised by Apostolopoulos et al. almost 10 years ago (Apostolopoulos et al., 2015) still unanswered—influence these stretching effects?

Their results showed that stretching exercises activate ‘endogenous modulation of somatosensory input’, with more pronounced effects at regional sites compared to distant sites. While their standardized protocol using a seated position in the Biodex system provided good experimental control, it may limit generalizability to clinical practice where stretching is performed in various positions. The interaction between body position, gravitational effects and pain modulation pathways could significantly influence both local and systemic responses (Cooper et al., 2023).

The clinical implications extend beyond simple stretching exercises. Traditional movement practices like yoga and Chinese exercises (e.g. Baduanjin) incorporate various stretching intensities, potentially activating similar pain-modulating pathways (Wang et al., 2021). Understanding whether the intensity-independent hypoalgesic effect holds true across different positions and delivery methods would advance therapeutic applications. This is particularly relevant given that the mechanical loading and proprioceptive input may vary significantly with body position.

These findings could guide clinicians in prescribing stretching exercises, suggesting that gentler approaches might be equally effective for pain management. However, future research should examine not only the effects in diverse populations but also how different body positions might influence stretching intensity and subsequent pain modulation outcomes.

超越强度:关于拉伸引起的低痛感的评论。
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Støve等人最近的一项研究,该研究考察了拉伸强度和疼痛敏感性,结果表明,低强度和高强度拉伸都会产生相似的镇痛效果(Støve等人,2024)。这一发现提出了两个重要的问题:如果低强度的拉伸可以达到类似的疼痛调节效果,为什么还需要进行高强度的拉伸?更根本的是,身体姿势——Apostolopoulos等人在近10年前提出的一个问题(Apostolopoulos等人,2015)仍然没有答案——是如何影响这些拉伸效果的?他们的研究结果表明,伸展运动激活了“体感输入的内源性调节”,与远距离部位相比,局部部位的效果更为明显。虽然他们在Biodex系统中使用坐姿的标准化方案提供了良好的实验控制,但它可能会限制在临床实践中以各种姿势进行拉伸的普遍性。体位、重力效应和疼痛调节途径之间的相互作用可以显著影响局部和全身反应(Cooper et al., 2023)。临床意义超出了简单的伸展运动。传统的运动练习,如瑜伽和中式运动(如八段筋)包含各种拉伸强度,潜在地激活类似的疼痛调节途径(Wang等,2021)。了解强度无关的镇痛效应是否适用于不同的体位和给药方式,将促进治疗应用。这是特别相关的考虑到机械负荷和本体感觉输入可能显著不同的身体位置。这些发现可以指导临床医生开伸展运动的处方,表明更温和的方法可能对疼痛管理同样有效。然而,未来的研究不仅应该检查不同人群的影响,还应该检查不同的身体姿势如何影响拉伸强度和随后的疼痛调节结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信