The Functional Capacity of the Upper Airway in Older Adults with Chronic Stroke.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Esther Prados-Román, Mónica Zapata-Soria, Irene Cabrera-Martos, Geraldine Valenza-Peña, Andrés Calvache-Mateo, Javier Martín-Núñez, Marie Carmen Valenza
{"title":"The Functional Capacity of the Upper Airway in Older Adults with Chronic Stroke.","authors":"Esther Prados-Román, Mónica Zapata-Soria, Irene Cabrera-Martos, Geraldine Valenza-Peña, Andrés Calvache-Mateo, Javier Martín-Núñez, Marie Carmen Valenza","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9060140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Older adults with chronic stroke may experience compromised upper airway functions due to stroke-related changes and aging. This study aimed to evaluate the functional capacity of the upper airway in older adults with chronic stroke. (2) Methods: A total of 44 patients (22 in each group) were included in the study. The respiratory assessment involved measuring forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, maximum voluntary ventilation, and peak cough flow. The voice assessment recorded intensity, frequency, shimmer, and the harmonics-to-noise ratio during a monologue task. Additionally, the maximum phonation time of /a/ and /s/ was recorded. The swallowing assessment included the Eating Assessment Tool-10 and the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire. (3) Results: Significant differences were found in the experimental group compared to the control group in maximum voluntary ventilation (44.59 ± 15.61 vs. 58.50 ± 28.08, <i>p</i> = 0.049) and peak cough flow (173.64 ± 101.09 vs. 291.59 ± 176.58, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Additionally, the experimental group showed poorer results than the control group in monologue intensity (66.60 ± 3.72 vs. 114.72 ± 63.09, <i>p</i> = 0.001), the harmonics-to-noise ratio (9.08 ± 2.06 vs. 10.26 ± 1.59, <i>p</i> = 0.042), and the maximum phonation time of /s/ (4.36 ± 1.67 vs. 8.09 ± 4.07, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with stroke also had significantly lower values for swallowing efficiency and safety compared to the control group (7.05 ± 8.44 vs. 2.23 ± 4.14, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and reported poorer quality of life related to swallowing difficulties (185.50 ± 23.66 vs. 200.32 ± 19.60, <i>p</i> = 0.029). (4) Conclusions: Older adults with chronic stroke exhibited significantly reduced cough strength, voice intensity, maximum phonation time, and swallowing function compared to controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9060140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Older adults with chronic stroke may experience compromised upper airway functions due to stroke-related changes and aging. This study aimed to evaluate the functional capacity of the upper airway in older adults with chronic stroke. (2) Methods: A total of 44 patients (22 in each group) were included in the study. The respiratory assessment involved measuring forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, maximum voluntary ventilation, and peak cough flow. The voice assessment recorded intensity, frequency, shimmer, and the harmonics-to-noise ratio during a monologue task. Additionally, the maximum phonation time of /a/ and /s/ was recorded. The swallowing assessment included the Eating Assessment Tool-10 and the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire. (3) Results: Significant differences were found in the experimental group compared to the control group in maximum voluntary ventilation (44.59 ± 15.61 vs. 58.50 ± 28.08, p = 0.049) and peak cough flow (173.64 ± 101.09 vs. 291.59 ± 176.58, p = 0.009). Additionally, the experimental group showed poorer results than the control group in monologue intensity (66.60 ± 3.72 vs. 114.72 ± 63.09, p = 0.001), the harmonics-to-noise ratio (9.08 ± 2.06 vs. 10.26 ± 1.59, p = 0.042), and the maximum phonation time of /s/ (4.36 ± 1.67 vs. 8.09 ± 4.07, p < 0.001). Patients with stroke also had significantly lower values for swallowing efficiency and safety compared to the control group (7.05 ± 8.44 vs. 2.23 ± 4.14, p = 0.021) and reported poorer quality of life related to swallowing difficulties (185.50 ± 23.66 vs. 200.32 ± 19.60, p = 0.029). (4) Conclusions: Older adults with chronic stroke exhibited significantly reduced cough strength, voice intensity, maximum phonation time, and swallowing function compared to controls.

慢性中风老年人的上呼吸道功能能力。
(1) 背景:患有慢性中风的老年人可能会因中风相关变化和衰老而导致上呼吸道功能受损。本研究旨在评估慢性中风老年人的上气道功能能力。(2)方法:研究共纳入 44 名患者(每组 22 人)。呼吸评估包括测量用力呼吸量、一秒内用力呼气量、最大自主通气量和咳嗽峰值流量。语音评估记录了独白任务中的强度、频率、颤音和谐波噪声比。此外,还记录了/a/和/s/的最大发音时间。吞咽评估包括进食评估工具-10 和吞咽生活质量问卷。(3)结果:实验组与对照组相比,在最大自主通气量(44.59 ± 15.61 vs. 58.50 ± 28.08,p = 0.049)和咳嗽峰值流量(173.64 ± 101.09 vs. 291.59 ± 176.58,p = 0.009)方面存在显著差异。此外,实验组在独白强度(66.60 ± 3.72 vs. 114.72 ± 63.09,p = 0.001)、谐波噪声比(9.08 ± 2.06 vs. 10.26 ± 1.59,p = 0.042)和/s/的最大发音时间(4.36 ± 1.67 vs. 8.09 ± 4.07,p < 0.001)方面的结果均低于对照组。与对照组相比,脑卒中患者的吞咽效率和安全性值也明显较低(7.05 ± 8.44 vs. 2.23 ± 4.14,p = 0.021),并且与吞咽困难相关的生活质量也较差(185.50 ± 23.66 vs. 200.32 ± 19.60,p = 0.029)。(4) 结论:与对照组相比,慢性中风老年人的咳嗽强度、声音强度、最大发音时间和吞咽功能明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信