The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of low- and high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Merve Nur Taşdemir, Uluhan Eryürük, Ural Oğuz, Birgül Tok, Serdar Aslan
{"title":"The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of low- and high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Merve Nur Taşdemir, Uluhan Eryürük, Ural Oğuz, Birgül Tok, Serdar Aslan","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.243004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) parameters in predicting the differentiation between low- and high-grade tumors in non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with NMIBC, who were histopathologically confirmed between August 2020 and July 2023, were analyzed by 2 radiologists with different levels of experience. DCE semi-quantitative parameters such as wash-in rate (WiR), wash-out ratio (WoR), time to peak (TTP), and peak enhancement (PE) were calculated. ADC measurements were performed using the three-region-of-interest (ADCt) and whole volume (ADCw) methods; ADCt ratio (ADCtR) and ADCw ratio (ADCwR) were also calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to demonstrate the cut-off values of ADCt, ADCw, ADCtR, and ADCwR to differentiate low- and high-grade tumors. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 48 had low-grade NMIBC, and 41 had high-grade NMIBC. There was no significant difference in mean WoR, WiR, TTP, and PE values between low- and high-grade NMIBC (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The ADCt, ADCw, ADCtR, and ADCwR values of high-grade NMIBC were significantly lower than those of low-grade NMIBC (<i>P</i> < 0.001). With cut-off values of 0.449 and 0.435, ADCtR had the best diagnostic value for both readers, showing better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (85.4%-83.1%, 87.5%-85.4%, 82.9%-80.4%, and 0.879-0.857, respectively, with confidence intervals). Additionally, ADCtR and ADCt showed acceptable diagnostic performance for both readers, with cut-off values of 0.439 and 0.431, respectively, for differentiating Ta- and T1-stages. The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for ADC measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DCE semiquantative parameters did not yield significant outcomes in distinguishing between low and high grades, ADCtR holds promise for enhancing patient management in NMIBC cases and stands as a potential preoperative radiological asset.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Individuals diagnosed with NMIBC may require different treatment approaches; therefore, it is very important to distinguish between low- and high-grade cases preoperatively. The differentiation between the Ta- and T1-stages is recognized as crucial in patient treatment strategies. Furthermore, ADCtR shows promise for improving patient management in NMIBC cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.243004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) parameters in predicting the differentiation between low- and high-grade tumors in non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC).

Methods: Patients with NMIBC, who were histopathologically confirmed between August 2020 and July 2023, were analyzed by 2 radiologists with different levels of experience. DCE semi-quantitative parameters such as wash-in rate (WiR), wash-out ratio (WoR), time to peak (TTP), and peak enhancement (PE) were calculated. ADC measurements were performed using the three-region-of-interest (ADCt) and whole volume (ADCw) methods; ADCt ratio (ADCtR) and ADCw ratio (ADCwR) were also calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to demonstrate the cut-off values of ADCt, ADCw, ADCtR, and ADCwR to differentiate low- and high-grade tumors. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement.

Results: A total of 89 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 48 had low-grade NMIBC, and 41 had high-grade NMIBC. There was no significant difference in mean WoR, WiR, TTP, and PE values between low- and high-grade NMIBC (P > 0.05). The ADCt, ADCw, ADCtR, and ADCwR values of high-grade NMIBC were significantly lower than those of low-grade NMIBC (P < 0.001). With cut-off values of 0.449 and 0.435, ADCtR had the best diagnostic value for both readers, showing better accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (85.4%-83.1%, 87.5%-85.4%, 82.9%-80.4%, and 0.879-0.857, respectively, with confidence intervals). Additionally, ADCtR and ADCt showed acceptable diagnostic performance for both readers, with cut-off values of 0.439 and 0.431, respectively, for differentiating Ta- and T1-stages. The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for ADC measurements.

Conclusion: While DCE semiquantative parameters did not yield significant outcomes in distinguishing between low and high grades, ADCtR holds promise for enhancing patient management in NMIBC cases and stands as a potential preoperative radiological asset.

Clinical significance: Individuals diagnosed with NMIBC may require different treatment approaches; therefore, it is very important to distinguish between low- and high-grade cases preoperatively. The differentiation between the Ta- and T1-stages is recognized as crucial in patient treatment strategies. Furthermore, ADCtR shows promise for improving patient management in NMIBC cases.

多参数磁共振成像在区分低级别和高级别非肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的作用。
目的:评估表观弥散系数(ADC)测量和半定量动态对比增强(DCE)参数在预测非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)低级别和高级别肿瘤分化方面的诊断效果:由两名具有不同经验的放射科医生对2020年8月至2023年7月期间经组织病理学确诊的NMIBC患者进行分析。计算 DCE 半定量参数,如洗入率 (WiR)、洗出比 (WoR)、达峰时间 (TTP) 和峰值增强 (PE)。ADC 测量采用三感兴趣区法(ADCt)和全容积法(ADCw);ADCt 比值(ADCtR)和 ADCw 比值(ADCwR)也被计算出来。接收者操作特征曲线分析表明了 ADCt、ADCw、ADCtR 和 ADCwR 区分低分级和高级别肿瘤的临界值。采用类内相关系数评估读片者之间的一致性:本研究共纳入 89 例患者。结果:本研究共纳入 89 例患者,其中 48 例为低分级 NMIBC,41 例为高级别 NMIBC。低级别和高级别 NMIBC 的平均 WoR、WiR、TTP 和 PE 值无明显差异(P > 0.05)。高级别 NMIBC 的 ADCt、ADCw、ADCtR 和 ADCwR 值明显低于低级别 NMIBC(P < 0.001)。在截断值为 0.449 和 0.435 时,ADCtR 对两位读者都具有最佳诊断价值,显示出更好的准确性、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(分别为 85.4%-83.1%、87.5%-85.4%、82.9%-80.4% 和 0.879-0.857,有置信区间)。此外,ADCtR 和 ADCt 对两位读者都显示出了可接受的诊断性能,在区分 Ta 期和 T1 期方面的临界值分别为 0.439 和 0.431。ADC测量的读数间一致性几乎完美:结论:虽然 DCE 半定量参数在区分低度和高度分级方面没有产生显著效果,但 ADCtR 有希望加强对 NMIBC 患者的管理,是一种潜在的术前放射学资产:临床意义:确诊为 NMIBC 的患者可能需要不同的治疗方法;因此,术前区分低分级和高级别病例非常重要。Ta期和T1期的区分被认为是患者治疗策略的关键。此外,ADCtR有望改善NMIBC病例的患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信