The Distribution of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure in Taiwan.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cze Ci Chan, Hung-Chi Su, Chi Chuang, Tzyy-Jer Hsu, Fu-Chih Hsiao, Pao-Hsien Chu
{"title":"The Distribution of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure in Taiwan.","authors":"Cze Ci Chan, Hung-Chi Su, Chi Chuang, Tzyy-Jer Hsu, Fu-Chih Hsiao, Pao-Hsien Chu","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202411_40(6).20240918A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the distribution of left ventricular ejection fraction among patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and the outcomes of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in Taiwan are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed HF were identified from a multi-institutional database between 2016 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients with HFpEF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,736 newly diagnosed HF patients, 4,393 (56.8%) had HFpEF and 1,977 (25.6%) had HFrEF. The HFpEF group was older (71.5 vs. 64.2 years) and more likely to be female (48.9% vs. 31.1%). Comorbidities were more common in the HFpEF patients. Median follow-up was 2.1 years. Prior to PSM, the HFpEF patients had higher all-cause mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.33] but lower cardiovascular (CV) death risk (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97) compared to those with HFrEF. The HFpEF group had a trend of higher overall hospitalization risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14), but lower HF hospitalization risk (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55- 0.67). After PSM, all-cause mortality and overall hospitalization were comparable. The HFpEF group had lower rates of CV death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-1.0) and HF hospitalization (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.69) compared to the HFrEF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with newly diagnosed HF, HFpEF is the predominant phenotype, characterized by older age, higher female prevalence, and increased comorbidities. After adjusting for these factors, all-cause death and hospitalization risks became similar between the HFpEF and HFrEF patients. The HFpEF patients had lower risks of CV death and HF hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"40 6","pages":"740-750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202411_40(6).20240918A","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the distribution of left ventricular ejection fraction among patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and the outcomes of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in Taiwan are limited.

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed HF were identified from a multi-institutional database between 2016 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients with HFpEF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: Of 7,736 newly diagnosed HF patients, 4,393 (56.8%) had HFpEF and 1,977 (25.6%) had HFrEF. The HFpEF group was older (71.5 vs. 64.2 years) and more likely to be female (48.9% vs. 31.1%). Comorbidities were more common in the HFpEF patients. Median follow-up was 2.1 years. Prior to PSM, the HFpEF patients had higher all-cause mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.33] but lower cardiovascular (CV) death risk (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97) compared to those with HFrEF. The HFpEF group had a trend of higher overall hospitalization risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14), but lower HF hospitalization risk (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55- 0.67). After PSM, all-cause mortality and overall hospitalization were comparable. The HFpEF group had lower rates of CV death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-1.0) and HF hospitalization (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.69) compared to the HFrEF group.

Conclusions: Among patients with newly diagnosed HF, HFpEF is the predominant phenotype, characterized by older age, higher female prevalence, and increased comorbidities. After adjusting for these factors, all-cause death and hospitalization risks became similar between the HFpEF and HFrEF patients. The HFpEF patients had lower risks of CV death and HF hospitalization.

台湾新诊断心力衰竭患者的左心室射血分数分布、特征和临床结果。
背景:台湾有关新诊断心力衰竭(HF)患者左心室射血分数分布以及射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者预后的数据十分有限:方法:从2016年至2020年间的多机构数据库中筛选出新诊断的心衰患者。结果:在7736名新确诊的射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中,有7736人的射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的射血分数低于HFrEF:在7736名新确诊的心衰患者中,4393人(56.8%)患有HFpEF,1977人(25.6%)患有HFrEF。HFpEF 组年龄较大(71.5 岁对 64.2 岁),女性比例较高(48.9% 对 31.1%)。合并症在HFpEF患者中更为常见。中位随访时间为 2.1 年。在进行 PSM 之前,与 HFrEF 患者相比,HFpEF 患者的全因死亡风险较高 [危险比 (HR) 1.21,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.11-1.33],但心血管 (CV) 死亡风险较低 (HR 0.84,95% CI 0.72-0.97)。HFpEF 组的总体住院风险呈上升趋势(HR 1.06,95% CI 0.99-1.14),但 HF 住院风险较低(HR 0.61,95% CI 0.55-0.67)。PSM 后,全因死亡率和总体住院率相当。与HFrEF组相比,HFpEF组的CV死亡率(HR 0.82,95% CI 0.68-1.0)和HF住院率(HR 0.60,95% CI 0.53-0.69)更低:结论:在新确诊的心房颤动患者中,HFpEF是最主要的表型,其特点是年龄大、女性发病率高、合并症多。在对这些因素进行调整后,HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的全因死亡和住院风险变得相似。HFpEF患者的心血管死亡和心房颤动住院风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信