Practitioners’ Needs for Addressing the Challenges of Sea-Level Rise—A Qualitative Assessment

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004717
D. Hirschfeld, K. M. Archie, E. Mateo, J. C. Arnott, J. A. Vano
{"title":"Practitioners’ Needs for Addressing the Challenges of Sea-Level Rise—A Qualitative Assessment","authors":"D. Hirschfeld,&nbsp;K. M. Archie,&nbsp;E. Mateo,&nbsp;J. C. Arnott,&nbsp;J. A. Vano","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Practitioners at the local and regional scale are under increased pressure to reduce risks to people and property posed by the threats of sea-level rise (SLR) and associated impacts. To achieve this, a dialog between practitioners and scientists is imperative. Current research documents impacts of SLR, evaluates local SLR adaptation activities, identifies barriers to action, and works to assess local adaptive capacity. Despite this work, there has been little qualitative assessment of practitioners' needs when it comes to translating SLR science into local changes. To fill this gap, we used a combination of semi-structured interviews and surveys. The interviews revealed practitioners’ needs, the tools they use, the challenges they face, and the contexts in which they make decisions. The survey allowed practitioners to rank potential interventions according to the level of impact they believed it would have on coastal adaptation planning. In total our study includes the perspectives of 142 practitioners from 24 states, Puerto Rico, the Mariana Islands, and Barbados. Corroborating earlier work, we find that resources broadly and funding specifically is the largest barrier faced by practitioners. We find that practitioners need more localized information and models supported by on the ground monitoring, decision support resources that allow for comparison of different scenarios, and communication tools that will enable them to engage with key audiences. These needs suggest a critical shift toward building trusted relationship between scientists and local practitioners and the need to bolster organizations that can support a bridge between these two contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004717","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004717","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practitioners at the local and regional scale are under increased pressure to reduce risks to people and property posed by the threats of sea-level rise (SLR) and associated impacts. To achieve this, a dialog between practitioners and scientists is imperative. Current research documents impacts of SLR, evaluates local SLR adaptation activities, identifies barriers to action, and works to assess local adaptive capacity. Despite this work, there has been little qualitative assessment of practitioners' needs when it comes to translating SLR science into local changes. To fill this gap, we used a combination of semi-structured interviews and surveys. The interviews revealed practitioners’ needs, the tools they use, the challenges they face, and the contexts in which they make decisions. The survey allowed practitioners to rank potential interventions according to the level of impact they believed it would have on coastal adaptation planning. In total our study includes the perspectives of 142 practitioners from 24 states, Puerto Rico, the Mariana Islands, and Barbados. Corroborating earlier work, we find that resources broadly and funding specifically is the largest barrier faced by practitioners. We find that practitioners need more localized information and models supported by on the ground monitoring, decision support resources that allow for comparison of different scenarios, and communication tools that will enable them to engage with key audiences. These needs suggest a critical shift toward building trusted relationship between scientists and local practitioners and the need to bolster organizations that can support a bridge between these two contexts.

Abstract Image

从业人员应对海平面上升挑战的需求--定性评估
地方和区域范围内的从业人员面临着越来越大的压力,他们必须降低海平面上升(SLR)的威胁及相关影响给人员和财产带来的风险。为此,从业人员与科学家之间的对话势在必行。目前的研究记录了 SLR 的影响,评估了当地的 SLR 适应活动,确定了行动的障碍,并致力于评估当地的适应能力。尽管开展了这些工作,但在将可持续土地退化和干旱科学转化为当地变化方面,对实践者需求的定性评估却很少。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了半结构式访谈和调查相结合的方法。访谈揭示了实践者的需求、他们使用的工具、他们面临的挑战以及他们做出决策的背景。通过调查,从业人员可以根据他们认为对沿岸适应规划的影响程度,对潜在的干预措施进行排序。我们的研究总共包括来自 24 个州、波多黎各、马里亚纳群岛和巴巴多斯的 142 位从业人员的观点。与之前的研究结果相吻合,我们发现资源和资金是从业人员面临的最大障碍。我们发现,实践者需要更多的本地化信息和模型,这些信息和模型需要得到实地监测的支持,需要能够对不同方案进行比较的决策支持资源,还需要能够让他们与关键受众接触的交流工具。这些需求表明,在科学家和当地从业人员之间建立相互信任的关系是一个关键的转变,同时也需要支持能够在这两种情况之间架起桥梁的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信