Environmental impact assessment of alternative technologies for production of biofuels from spent coffee grounds

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Wilberforce Kisiga, Manimagalay Chetty, Sudesh Rathilal
{"title":"Environmental impact assessment of alternative technologies for production of biofuels from spent coffee grounds","authors":"Wilberforce Kisiga,&nbsp;Manimagalay Chetty,&nbsp;Sudesh Rathilal","doi":"10.1002/ese3.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the strategy to combat climate change that has been caused by the world's overdependence on fossil fuels, current research is focusing on the decarbonisation of the energy sector through the production of renewable cleaner energy, such as biofuels. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs), the waste stream of the coffee brewing industry, are a potential feedstock for the production of valuable products, including biofuels. However, the environmental implications for the valorisation of this valuable waste need to be investigated. This study assesses the environmental impacts of six biomass-to-fuel processing technologies using SCGs as a feedstock, with the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly technology. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted on fast pyrolysis, fermentation, anaerobic digestion (AD), hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), gasification, and biodiesel production. The mass and energy balances obtained from Aspen Plus simulations served as the life-cycle inventory data. Using the ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) and Eco-Indicator 99 as the assessment methods, potential environmental impacts were calculated in OpenLCA software. Electricity generation and carbon dioxide emissions were the biggest contributors of environmental impacts. For each category, the maximum result was set to 100% and the results of the other variants were displayed in relation to this result. AD, with the smallest total weighted score (160), was the most environmentally friendly biomass-to-fuel processing route, while HTL, with the biggest total weighted score (893), was the worst. A sensitivity analysis indicated that the environmental performance of biofuel production from SCGs was highly influenced by energy input flows and the source of energy generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"12 11","pages":"4823-4842"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.1933","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the strategy to combat climate change that has been caused by the world's overdependence on fossil fuels, current research is focusing on the decarbonisation of the energy sector through the production of renewable cleaner energy, such as biofuels. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs), the waste stream of the coffee brewing industry, are a potential feedstock for the production of valuable products, including biofuels. However, the environmental implications for the valorisation of this valuable waste need to be investigated. This study assesses the environmental impacts of six biomass-to-fuel processing technologies using SCGs as a feedstock, with the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly technology. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted on fast pyrolysis, fermentation, anaerobic digestion (AD), hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), gasification, and biodiesel production. The mass and energy balances obtained from Aspen Plus simulations served as the life-cycle inventory data. Using the ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) and Eco-Indicator 99 as the assessment methods, potential environmental impacts were calculated in OpenLCA software. Electricity generation and carbon dioxide emissions were the biggest contributors of environmental impacts. For each category, the maximum result was set to 100% and the results of the other variants were displayed in relation to this result. AD, with the smallest total weighted score (160), was the most environmentally friendly biomass-to-fuel processing route, while HTL, with the biggest total weighted score (893), was the worst. A sensitivity analysis indicated that the environmental performance of biofuel production from SCGs was highly influenced by energy input flows and the source of energy generation.

Abstract Image

利用废咖啡渣生产生物燃料替代技术的环境影响评估
在应对因世界过度依赖化石燃料而造成的气候变化的战略中,目前的研究重点是通过生产可再生清洁能源(如生物燃料)来实现能源行业的去碳化。废弃咖啡渣(SCGs)是咖啡酿造业的废物流,是生产包括生物燃料在内的有价值产品的潜在原料。然而,这种有价值的废弃物的价值化对环境的影响仍有待研究。本研究评估了以咖啡渣为原料的六种生物质转化为燃料的加工技术对环境的影响,旨在找出最环保的技术。对快速热解、发酵、厌氧消化(AD)、水热液化(HTL)、气化和生物柴油生产进行了从摇篮到终点的生命周期评估(LCA)。从 Aspen Plus 模拟中获得的质量和能量平衡作为生命周期清单数据。使用 ReCiPe 2016 中点(H)和生态指标 99 作为评估方法,在 OpenLCA 软件中计算了潜在的环境影响。发电量和二氧化碳排放量是造成环境影响的最大因素。对于每个类别,最大结果被设定为 100%,其他变量的结果显示与这一结果相关。加权总分最小(160 分)的厌氧消化(AD)是最环保的生物质转化为燃料的加工路线,而加权总分最大(893 分)的热液化(HTL)则是最差的。敏感性分析表明,利用 SCG 生产生物燃料的环境绩效受能源输入流量和能源来源的影响很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信