Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux-modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Saeed Abareshi, Jawad Faiz, Mehrage Ghods
{"title":"Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux-modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles","authors":"Saeed Abareshi,&nbsp;Jawad Faiz,&nbsp;Mehrage Ghods","doi":"10.1049/elp2.12500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Direct drive permanent magnet (PM) motors have become a very attractive choice for electric vehicles. Generally, PM motors are divided into PM synchronous motors (PMSMs) and PM flux-modulated motors (PMFMMs). High torque density is the main requirement of direct drive motors, therefore, the structure of conventional PM motors is modified to boost the torque. Increasing the number of poles is a structural modification to achieve high torque density in PMSMs; however, a large number of poles affects motor characteristics such as power factor, flux weakening, losses, and efficiency. The other way to have high torque is to use PMFMMs, which have a high intrinsic torque density. This paper first compares the performance of PMSMs with different number of poles. Then the performance of PMFMMs and PMSMs are compared to show their differences. The performance of PMFMMs with different teeth modulators and magnetic gear ratios are predicted to show their effects upon its performance. The simulation results using finite elements method|finite element method (FEM) are presented, and finally, a PMFMM with 36 slots and 40 poles as case study is subjected to an experimental test and its results are compared with FEM.</p><p>The cover image is based on the article <i>Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux-modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles</i> by Saeed Abareshi et al., https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500.</p>","PeriodicalId":13352,"journal":{"name":"Iet Electric Power Applications","volume":"18 10","pages":"1095-1106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/elp2.12500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iet Electric Power Applications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/elp2.12500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct drive permanent magnet (PM) motors have become a very attractive choice for electric vehicles. Generally, PM motors are divided into PM synchronous motors (PMSMs) and PM flux-modulated motors (PMFMMs). High torque density is the main requirement of direct drive motors, therefore, the structure of conventional PM motors is modified to boost the torque. Increasing the number of poles is a structural modification to achieve high torque density in PMSMs; however, a large number of poles affects motor characteristics such as power factor, flux weakening, losses, and efficiency. The other way to have high torque is to use PMFMMs, which have a high intrinsic torque density. This paper first compares the performance of PMSMs with different number of poles. Then the performance of PMFMMs and PMSMs are compared to show their differences. The performance of PMFMMs with different teeth modulators and magnetic gear ratios are predicted to show their effects upon its performance. The simulation results using finite elements method|finite element method (FEM) are presented, and finally, a PMFMM with 36 slots and 40 poles as case study is subjected to an experimental test and its results are compared with FEM.

The cover image is based on the article Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux-modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles by Saeed Abareshi et al., https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500.

Abstract Image

考虑转子极数的直接驱动永磁同步机与永磁磁通调制机的比较
直驱永磁(PM)电机已成为电动汽车中极具吸引力的选择。一般来说,永磁电机分为永磁同步电机(PMSM)和永磁磁通调制电机(PMFMM)。高转矩密度是直接驱动电机的主要要求,因此传统永磁电机的结构需要改进以提高转矩。增加极数是 PMSM 实现高转矩密度的一种结构调整方法,但大量极数会影响功率因数、磁通削弱、损耗和效率等电机特性。另一种获得高转矩的方法是使用 PMFMM,它具有很高的固有转矩密度。本文首先比较了不同极数的 PMSM 的性能。然后比较 PMFMM 和 PMSM 的性能,以显示它们之间的差异。本文还预测了采用不同齿调制器和磁齿轮比的 PMFMM 的性能,以显示它们对其性能的影响。封面图片基于 Saeed Abareshi 等人的文章《考虑转子极数的直接驱动中永磁同步机和永磁磁通调制机的比较》(Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux-modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles),https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iet Electric Power Applications
Iet Electric Power Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: IET Electric Power Applications publishes papers of a high technical standard with a suitable balance of practice and theory. The scope covers a wide range of applications and apparatus in the power field. In addition to papers focussing on the design and development of electrical equipment, papers relying on analysis are also sought, provided that the arguments are conveyed succinctly and the conclusions are clear. The scope of the journal includes the following: The design and analysis of motors and generators of all sizes Rotating electrical machines Linear machines Actuators Power transformers Railway traction machines and drives Variable speed drives Machines and drives for electrically powered vehicles Industrial and non-industrial applications and processes Current Special Issue. Call for papers: Progress in Electric Machines, Power Converters and their Control for Wave Energy Generation - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_EPA_CFP_PEMPCCWEG.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信