Numerical simulation analysis of effect of borehole gas extraction under fluid-structure interaction

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Lin Wang, Ziyao Yang, Xiangjun Chen, Shuailong Feng
{"title":"Numerical simulation analysis of effect of borehole gas extraction under fluid-structure interaction","authors":"Lin Wang,&nbsp;Ziyao Yang,&nbsp;Xiangjun Chen,&nbsp;Shuailong Feng","doi":"10.1002/ese3.1945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To study the effect of coal pressure on gas extraction under fluid-solid coupling, the effect of gas extraction radius under different pore sizes and treatment methods was simulated by using COMSOL Multiphysics software, the time evolution law of gas pressure on coal surface was obtained, and the numerical simulation results were verified by the observation of flow rate and concentration in experimental mine combined with fluid-solid interaction. The results show that the distance of extraction radius increases with the increase of borehole diameter, and the relation between extraction time and extraction radius is a power function, but the increase gets smaller and smaller until it becomes zero. For Φ98 mm borehole and Φ120 mm borehole, hydraulic treatment can increase the efficiency of gas extraction by 31.3% and 22.7%, respectively. For hydraulic treatment and conventional treatment, the ratio of gas drainage effect by enlarging hole size is 6.3% and 13.8% respectively. Compared with the areas without gas extraction under the four conditions, the descending speed of gas pressure from fast to slow is Φ120 mm hydraulic flushing treatment, Φ98 mm hydraulic flushing treatment, Φ120 mm conventional treatment, Φ98 mm conventional treatment. Compared with four different conditions, after 180 days of extraction the coal gas pressure decreased by 75.3% within reasonable hole spacing. At the same time, in multi-hole pumping, the influence area of adjacent borehole is larger than that of single-hole pumping, and the spacing of borehole should be less than twice the radius of pumping.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"12 11","pages":"5185-5199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.1945","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the effect of coal pressure on gas extraction under fluid-solid coupling, the effect of gas extraction radius under different pore sizes and treatment methods was simulated by using COMSOL Multiphysics software, the time evolution law of gas pressure on coal surface was obtained, and the numerical simulation results were verified by the observation of flow rate and concentration in experimental mine combined with fluid-solid interaction. The results show that the distance of extraction radius increases with the increase of borehole diameter, and the relation between extraction time and extraction radius is a power function, but the increase gets smaller and smaller until it becomes zero. For Φ98 mm borehole and Φ120 mm borehole, hydraulic treatment can increase the efficiency of gas extraction by 31.3% and 22.7%, respectively. For hydraulic treatment and conventional treatment, the ratio of gas drainage effect by enlarging hole size is 6.3% and 13.8% respectively. Compared with the areas without gas extraction under the four conditions, the descending speed of gas pressure from fast to slow is Φ120 mm hydraulic flushing treatment, Φ98 mm hydraulic flushing treatment, Φ120 mm conventional treatment, Φ98 mm conventional treatment. Compared with four different conditions, after 180 days of extraction the coal gas pressure decreased by 75.3% within reasonable hole spacing. At the same time, in multi-hole pumping, the influence area of adjacent borehole is larger than that of single-hole pumping, and the spacing of borehole should be less than twice the radius of pumping.

Abstract Image

流体与结构相互作用下钻孔采气效应的数值模拟分析
为研究流固耦合作用下煤压对瓦斯抽采的影响,利用COMSOL Multiphysics软件模拟了不同孔径和处理方法下瓦斯抽采半径的影响,得到了煤面瓦斯压力的时间演化规律,并结合流固作用实验矿井的流量和浓度观测验证了数值模拟结果。结果表明,抽采半径随井眼直径的增大而增大,抽采时间与抽采半径之间呈幂函数关系,但增大的幅度越来越小,直至为零。对于 Φ98 mm 井眼和 Φ120 mm 井眼,水力处理可使瓦斯抽采效率分别提高 31.3% 和 22.7%。对于水力处理和常规处理,扩大钻孔尺寸的瓦斯抽放效果比分别为 6.3% 和 13.8%。与四种条件下未抽放瓦斯的区域相比,瓦斯压力由快到慢的下降速度分别为Φ120 mm水力冲洗处理、Φ98 mm水力冲洗处理、Φ120 mm常规处理、Φ98 mm常规处理。与四种不同条件相比,在合理孔距范围内,抽采 180 天后煤层瓦斯压力下降了 75.3%。同时,在多孔抽放中,相邻钻孔的影响面积比单孔抽放大,钻孔间距应小于抽放半径的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信