Environmental regulation, energy poverty and social welfare: Based on China's provincial panel data

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Jian Tang , Xiaoyue Huang , Hsing Hung Chen , Wangbo Gao , Xia Liu
{"title":"Environmental regulation, energy poverty and social welfare: Based on China's provincial panel data","authors":"Jian Tang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Huang ,&nbsp;Hsing Hung Chen ,&nbsp;Wangbo Gao ,&nbsp;Xia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alleviating energy poverty, improving the ecological environment, and promoting social welfare have become important issues in society. By taking panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020 as the research object, fixed effects models and system-GMM models are adopted, and the impacts of environmental regulations on social welfare and the moderating effect of energy poverty are studied in this paper. The results show that enhanced environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on social welfare, while flexible environmental regulation has the opposite, especially in energy poverty regions. Moreover, energy poverty has a significant negative impact on social welfare, and energy poverty reduces the consumption capacity of clean energy, which may pollute the environment and damage health, thus reducing social welfare. Additionally, the energy poverty has significant positive moderating effect, that is, energy poverty aggravates the inhibitory effect of enhanced environmental regulation on social welfare, and promotes the impact of flexible environmental regulation on social welfare. Finally, energy poverty varies significantly in different regions, and the energy poverty lines in the eastern, central and western regions, as well as the national are 503.381, 442.758, 359.461 and 444.546, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101592"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alleviating energy poverty, improving the ecological environment, and promoting social welfare have become important issues in society. By taking panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020 as the research object, fixed effects models and system-GMM models are adopted, and the impacts of environmental regulations on social welfare and the moderating effect of energy poverty are studied in this paper. The results show that enhanced environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on social welfare, while flexible environmental regulation has the opposite, especially in energy poverty regions. Moreover, energy poverty has a significant negative impact on social welfare, and energy poverty reduces the consumption capacity of clean energy, which may pollute the environment and damage health, thus reducing social welfare. Additionally, the energy poverty has significant positive moderating effect, that is, energy poverty aggravates the inhibitory effect of enhanced environmental regulation on social welfare, and promotes the impact of flexible environmental regulation on social welfare. Finally, energy poverty varies significantly in different regions, and the energy poverty lines in the eastern, central and western regions, as well as the national are 503.381, 442.758, 359.461 and 444.546, respectively.
环境监管、能源贫困与社会福利:基于中国省级面板数据
缓解能源贫困、改善生态环境、增进社会福利已成为社会的重要议题。本文以中国 30 个省份 2003-2020 年的面板数据为研究对象,采用固定效应模型和系统-GMM 模型,研究了环境规制对社会福利的影响以及能源贫困的调节作用。结果表明,强化环境规制对社会福利有显著的负面影响,而弹性环境规制则相反,尤其是在能源贫困地区。此外,能源贫困对社会福利有显著的负面影响,能源贫困会降低清洁能源的消费能力,从而可能污染环境、损害健康,进而降低社会福利。此外,能源贫困还具有显著的正向调节作用,即能源贫困加剧了强化环境规制对社会福利的抑制作用,促进了灵活环境规制对社会福利的影响。最后,能源贫困在不同地区存在显著差异,东部、中部和西部地区以及全国的能源贫困线分别为 503.381、442.758、359.461 和 444.546。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信