{"title":"Environmental regulation, energy poverty and social welfare: Based on China's provincial panel data","authors":"Jian Tang , Xiaoyue Huang , Hsing Hung Chen , Wangbo Gao , Xia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alleviating energy poverty, improving the ecological environment, and promoting social welfare have become important issues in society. By taking panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020 as the research object, fixed effects models and system-GMM models are adopted, and the impacts of environmental regulations on social welfare and the moderating effect of energy poverty are studied in this paper. The results show that enhanced environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on social welfare, while flexible environmental regulation has the opposite, especially in energy poverty regions. Moreover, energy poverty has a significant negative impact on social welfare, and energy poverty reduces the consumption capacity of clean energy, which may pollute the environment and damage health, thus reducing social welfare. Additionally, the energy poverty has significant positive moderating effect, that is, energy poverty aggravates the inhibitory effect of enhanced environmental regulation on social welfare, and promotes the impact of flexible environmental regulation on social welfare. Finally, energy poverty varies significantly in different regions, and the energy poverty lines in the eastern, central and western regions, as well as the national are 503.381, 442.758, 359.461 and 444.546, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101592"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alleviating energy poverty, improving the ecological environment, and promoting social welfare have become important issues in society. By taking panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020 as the research object, fixed effects models and system-GMM models are adopted, and the impacts of environmental regulations on social welfare and the moderating effect of energy poverty are studied in this paper. The results show that enhanced environmental regulation has a significant negative impact on social welfare, while flexible environmental regulation has the opposite, especially in energy poverty regions. Moreover, energy poverty has a significant negative impact on social welfare, and energy poverty reduces the consumption capacity of clean energy, which may pollute the environment and damage health, thus reducing social welfare. Additionally, the energy poverty has significant positive moderating effect, that is, energy poverty aggravates the inhibitory effect of enhanced environmental regulation on social welfare, and promotes the impact of flexible environmental regulation on social welfare. Finally, energy poverty varies significantly in different regions, and the energy poverty lines in the eastern, central and western regions, as well as the national are 503.381, 442.758, 359.461 and 444.546, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs.
Energy Strategy Reviews publishes:
• Analyses
• Methodologies
• Case Studies
• Reviews
And by invitation:
• Report Reviews
• Viewpoints