Advanced FEA simulation of GFRP and CFRP responses to low velocity impact: Exploring impactor diameter variations and damage mechanisms

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Muhamad Luthfi Hakim , Raihan Nafianto , Ariayana Dwiputra Nugraha , Ardi Wiranata , Eko Supriyanto , Gesang Nugroho , Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun
{"title":"Advanced FEA simulation of GFRP and CFRP responses to low velocity impact: Exploring impactor diameter variations and damage mechanisms","authors":"Muhamad Luthfi Hakim ,&nbsp;Raihan Nafianto ,&nbsp;Ariayana Dwiputra Nugraha ,&nbsp;Ardi Wiranata ,&nbsp;Eko Supriyanto ,&nbsp;Gesang Nugroho ,&nbsp;Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, the use of composite materials has experienced a significant increase in various fields. Fiber Reinforced Polymers Composite (FRPC) is one type of composite that is increasingly used due to its versatility and ability to improve product quality. However, FRPC materials have a high susceptibility to Low Velocity Impact (LVI) events, which can cause invisible internal damage such as delamination. LVI occurs when FRPC materials experience a sudden impact with a foreign object at a speed of 1–10 m/s, and can be identified through drop weight impact tests. This research addresses Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations to evaluate the mechanical properties of materials due to LVI, following the ASTM D7136 drop weight impact test standard. The variations studied include material types, namely Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymers (GFRP), as well as variations in the diameter of the impactor. The results showed that GFRP has more brittle properties than CFRP, which is indicated by the high absorption energy and larger maximum back surface displacement in CFRP. In addition, the damage in GFRP is more significant as CFRP requires a higher initiation force and energy to trigger and propagate the damage. The simulations also show that as the diameter of the impactor increases, the contact force increases, but the impact time is shorter. In contrast, a smaller diameter impactor penetrates the material more easily, with a smaller impact area and lower impact energy after contact occurs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100541"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024001105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of composite materials has experienced a significant increase in various fields. Fiber Reinforced Polymers Composite (FRPC) is one type of composite that is increasingly used due to its versatility and ability to improve product quality. However, FRPC materials have a high susceptibility to Low Velocity Impact (LVI) events, which can cause invisible internal damage such as delamination. LVI occurs when FRPC materials experience a sudden impact with a foreign object at a speed of 1–10 m/s, and can be identified through drop weight impact tests. This research addresses Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations to evaluate the mechanical properties of materials due to LVI, following the ASTM D7136 drop weight impact test standard. The variations studied include material types, namely Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymers (GFRP), as well as variations in the diameter of the impactor. The results showed that GFRP has more brittle properties than CFRP, which is indicated by the high absorption energy and larger maximum back surface displacement in CFRP. In addition, the damage in GFRP is more significant as CFRP requires a higher initiation force and energy to trigger and propagate the damage. The simulations also show that as the diameter of the impactor increases, the contact force increases, but the impact time is shorter. In contrast, a smaller diameter impactor penetrates the material more easily, with a smaller impact area and lower impact energy after contact occurs.
对 GFRP 和 CFRP 对低速冲击的响应进行高级有限元分析模拟:探索冲击器直径变化和损坏机制
近几十年来,复合材料在各个领域的使用大幅增加。纤维增强聚合物复合材料(FRPC)是复合材料的一种,因其多功能性和提高产品质量的能力而被越来越多地使用。然而,FRPC 材料非常容易受到低速冲击 (LVI) 事件的影响,从而造成分层等看不见的内部损坏。当 FRPC 材料受到速度为 1-10 米/秒的外来物体的突然冲击时,就会发生低速冲击,并可通过落重冲击测试加以识别。本研究按照 ASTM D7136 落锤冲击试验标准,通过有限元分析(FEA)模拟来评估材料在 LVI 作用下的机械性能。研究的变化包括材料类型,即碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)和玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP),以及冲击器直径的变化。结果表明,GFRP 比 CFRP 具有更强的脆性,这表现在 CFRP 具有更高的吸收能量和更大的最大背面位移。此外,GFRP 的损坏更为严重,因为 CFRP 需要更高的启动力和能量来触发和传播损坏。模拟结果还显示,随着撞击器直径的增大,接触力增大,但撞击时间缩短。相反,直径较小的撞击器更容易穿透材料,撞击面积更小,接触后的撞击能量更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信