Trends in Digit Replantation and Revision Amputation in the United States From 2009 to 2019

Q3 Medicine
Joseph G. Monir MD , Hayden Cooke BS , Olivia Jagiella-Lodise BS , Thomas McQuillan MD , Eric Wagner MD , Nicole A. Zelenski MD
{"title":"Trends in Digit Replantation and Revision Amputation in the United States From 2009 to 2019","authors":"Joseph G. Monir MD ,&nbsp;Hayden Cooke BS ,&nbsp;Olivia Jagiella-Lodise BS ,&nbsp;Thomas McQuillan MD ,&nbsp;Eric Wagner MD ,&nbsp;Nicole A. Zelenski MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Digit amputations can be managed either with replantation or revision amputation. The advent and refinement of microsurgical techniques allowed for the reliable success of replantation. Despite this, rates of digit replantation have been decreasing over the past several decades. A paucity of data exists on recent trends. The authors hypothesize that rates of both replantation and revision amputation will continue to downtrend.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>IBM Watson Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental databases were queried for digit replantation and revision amputations from 2009 to 2019. National volumes and incidences were estimated by combining these data with population data from the United States Census Bureau Public Use Microdata Sample. Linear regression was performed to evaluate trends. Subgroup analysis was performed for both volume and incidence to elucidate the role of age, sex, and geographical location.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2009 and 2019, there were an estimated 2,207 digit replantations and 53,810 digit revision amputations. The volume of replantations decreased by 42.2%, and the incidence of replantations decreased by 46.3%. The volume of revision amputations decreased by 16.2%, and the incidence of revision amputations decreased by 22.2%. Men were the majority of both groups, accounting for 75.6% of replantations and 83.6% of amputations. The replantation-to-amputation ratio decreased from 0.057 to 0.039 (−31.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both digit replantations and revision amputations continued to decline over the decade from 2009 to 2019. The downtrend in replantations outpaced the downtrend in revision amputations, resulting in a decreased replantation-to-amputation ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 855-860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Digit amputations can be managed either with replantation or revision amputation. The advent and refinement of microsurgical techniques allowed for the reliable success of replantation. Despite this, rates of digit replantation have been decreasing over the past several decades. A paucity of data exists on recent trends. The authors hypothesize that rates of both replantation and revision amputation will continue to downtrend.

Methods

IBM Watson Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental databases were queried for digit replantation and revision amputations from 2009 to 2019. National volumes and incidences were estimated by combining these data with population data from the United States Census Bureau Public Use Microdata Sample. Linear regression was performed to evaluate trends. Subgroup analysis was performed for both volume and incidence to elucidate the role of age, sex, and geographical location.

Results

Between 2009 and 2019, there were an estimated 2,207 digit replantations and 53,810 digit revision amputations. The volume of replantations decreased by 42.2%, and the incidence of replantations decreased by 46.3%. The volume of revision amputations decreased by 16.2%, and the incidence of revision amputations decreased by 22.2%. Men were the majority of both groups, accounting for 75.6% of replantations and 83.6% of amputations. The replantation-to-amputation ratio decreased from 0.057 to 0.039 (−31.0%).

Conclusions

Both digit replantations and revision amputations continued to decline over the decade from 2009 to 2019. The downtrend in replantations outpaced the downtrend in revision amputations, resulting in a decreased replantation-to-amputation ratio.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
2009 年至 2019 年美国 Digit Replantation 和 Revision Amputation 的趋势
目的 数字截肢可以通过再植或翻修截肢来处理。显微外科技术的出现和完善使再植手术获得了可靠的成功。尽管如此,在过去的几十年中,手指再植的比例一直在下降。有关近期趋势的数据很少。作者假设,再植和翻修截肢率将继续呈下降趋势。方法查询了 IBM Watson Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters 和 Medicare Supplemental 数据库,以了解 2009 年至 2019 年的指骨再植和翻修截肢情况。通过将这些数据与美国人口普查局公共使用微数据样本中的人口数据相结合,估算出了全国的截肢量和发病率。为评估趋势进行了线性回归。对数量和发病率进行了分组分析,以阐明年龄、性别和地理位置的作用。结果2009年至2019年间,估计有2207例指骨再植术和53810例指骨翻修截肢术。再植数量减少了 42.2%,再植发生率减少了 46.3%。翻修截肢的数量减少了 16.2%,翻修截肢的发生率减少了 22.2%。两组患者中男性居多,占再植手术的 75.6%,占截肢手术的 83.6%。再植与截肢的比率从 0.057 降至 0.039(-31.0%)。结论从 2009 年到 2019 年的十年间,数字再植和修正截肢都在持续下降。再植的下降趋势超过了翻修截肢的下降趋势,导致再植与截肢的比率下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信