Impact of muscadine genotype on postharvest fruit quality and storability

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Fariborz Habibi, Jeffrey K. Brecht, Ali Sarkhosh
{"title":"Impact of muscadine genotype on postharvest fruit quality and storability","authors":"Fariborz Habibi,&nbsp;Jeffrey K. Brecht,&nbsp;Ali Sarkhosh","doi":"10.1016/j.sajb.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The postharvest changes in bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of the whole fruit, peel, and flesh, as well as color, weight and firmness changes, were investigated in six commercial muscadine cultivars (three purple: ‘Alachua’ (AL), ‘Paulk’ (PA), and ‘Supreme’ (SU); and three bronze: ‘Granny Val’ (GV), ‘Hall’ (HA), and ‘Triumph’ (TR) during cold storage at 4 °C for 42 days. Weight loss increased significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), with SU losing 5.79% and HA losing 8.23% by day 42. Firmness significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) decreased during cold storage, with SU displaying the higest (164.02 g mm<sup>−1</sup>) and HA the lowest (110.75 g mm<sup>−1</sup>) by the end of storage. Total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and their ratio (TSS/TA) showed variations among cultivars and parts of the fruit, with purple cultivars consistently exhibiting higher titratable acidity (TA) compared to bronze cultivars, while bronze cultivars demonstrated higher TSS/TA ratios. TSS ranged from 13.25 to 16.8%, TA from 0.62 to 0.84%, and TSS/TA ratios varied from 20.53 to 41.23 across cultivars (in whole fruit). HA (15.32%) and TR (15.32%) exhibited the highest TSS content, while GV had the lowest TSS at 13.25%. In terms of TA, AL had the highest value at 0.86%, whereas HA (0.46%) and TR (0.51%) recorded the lowest TA. The TSS/TA ratio ranged from 18.31 in AL to 36.85 in HA, representing the lowest and highest ratios, respectively. Color parameters differed between purple and bronze cultivars, with purple cultivars displaying higher <em>a</em>* (red component), while bronze cultivars had higher <em>L</em>* and <em>C</em>* values (lighter and more pure color); the <em>h</em>° values of the purple and bronze cultivars were also significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) different, but did not differ within each group. The purple cultivars had higher total anthocyanin concentration (TAC) (8.4–15.31 mg L<sup>−1</sup>), total phenolic content (TPC) (92.11–107.01 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>), and total antioxidant activity (TAA) (150.25–250.05 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup>) than the bronze cultivars, and the peel had higher levels of those bioactive compounds than the flesh. AL exhibited the highest TAC at 15.31 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, followed by SU (13.01 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) and PA (8.4 mg L<sup>−1</sup>). In terms of TPC, AL (107.01 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>) and SU (92.11 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>) had the highest levels, with PA (74.89 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>) following. Among the bronze cultivars, TR had the highest TPC (61.41 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>), while GV exhibited the lowest (35.09 mg GAE L<sup>−1</sup>). The TAA of the purple cultivars ranged from around 250 to 134 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup> TE in whole fruit, 500 to 319 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup> in the peel, and 17 to 10 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup> in flesh, while the TAA of the bronze cultivars ranged from about 122 to 56 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup> TE in whole fruit, 248 to 120 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup> in the peel, and 16 to 10 μmoles L<sup>−1</sup>in the flesh. During cold storage, TAC, TPC, and TAA decreased in both the peel and the flesh, but more so in the peel. Two of the three purple cultivars (SU and AL) maintained more TAC, TPC, and TAA in the peel than the three bronze cultivars. Based on our results, the purple muscadine cultivar SU, followed by purple PA and AL, exhibited better storability than the bronze cultivars in terms of maintaining their quality factors closest to the initial values. Among the bronze cultivars, GV exhibited the best storability. Overall, the order of storability of muscadine cultivars was SU, PA, AL, GV, TR, and HA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21919,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Botany","volume":"176 ","pages":"Pages 62-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629924007348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The postharvest changes in bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of the whole fruit, peel, and flesh, as well as color, weight and firmness changes, were investigated in six commercial muscadine cultivars (three purple: ‘Alachua’ (AL), ‘Paulk’ (PA), and ‘Supreme’ (SU); and three bronze: ‘Granny Val’ (GV), ‘Hall’ (HA), and ‘Triumph’ (TR) during cold storage at 4 °C for 42 days. Weight loss increased significantly (P < 0.05), with SU losing 5.79% and HA losing 8.23% by day 42. Firmness significantly (P < 0.05) decreased during cold storage, with SU displaying the higest (164.02 g mm−1) and HA the lowest (110.75 g mm−1) by the end of storage. Total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and their ratio (TSS/TA) showed variations among cultivars and parts of the fruit, with purple cultivars consistently exhibiting higher titratable acidity (TA) compared to bronze cultivars, while bronze cultivars demonstrated higher TSS/TA ratios. TSS ranged from 13.25 to 16.8%, TA from 0.62 to 0.84%, and TSS/TA ratios varied from 20.53 to 41.23 across cultivars (in whole fruit). HA (15.32%) and TR (15.32%) exhibited the highest TSS content, while GV had the lowest TSS at 13.25%. In terms of TA, AL had the highest value at 0.86%, whereas HA (0.46%) and TR (0.51%) recorded the lowest TA. The TSS/TA ratio ranged from 18.31 in AL to 36.85 in HA, representing the lowest and highest ratios, respectively. Color parameters differed between purple and bronze cultivars, with purple cultivars displaying higher a* (red component), while bronze cultivars had higher L* and C* values (lighter and more pure color); the h° values of the purple and bronze cultivars were also significantly (P < 0.05) different, but did not differ within each group. The purple cultivars had higher total anthocyanin concentration (TAC) (8.4–15.31 mg L−1), total phenolic content (TPC) (92.11–107.01 mg GAE L−1), and total antioxidant activity (TAA) (150.25–250.05 μmoles L−1) than the bronze cultivars, and the peel had higher levels of those bioactive compounds than the flesh. AL exhibited the highest TAC at 15.31 mg L−1, followed by SU (13.01 mg L−1) and PA (8.4 mg L−1). In terms of TPC, AL (107.01 mg GAE L−1) and SU (92.11 mg GAE L−1) had the highest levels, with PA (74.89 mg GAE L−1) following. Among the bronze cultivars, TR had the highest TPC (61.41 mg GAE L−1), while GV exhibited the lowest (35.09 mg GAE L−1). The TAA of the purple cultivars ranged from around 250 to 134 μmoles L−1 TE in whole fruit, 500 to 319 μmoles L−1 in the peel, and 17 to 10 μmoles L−1 in flesh, while the TAA of the bronze cultivars ranged from about 122 to 56 μmoles L−1 TE in whole fruit, 248 to 120 μmoles L−1 in the peel, and 16 to 10 μmoles L−1in the flesh. During cold storage, TAC, TPC, and TAA decreased in both the peel and the flesh, but more so in the peel. Two of the three purple cultivars (SU and AL) maintained more TAC, TPC, and TAA in the peel than the three bronze cultivars. Based on our results, the purple muscadine cultivar SU, followed by purple PA and AL, exhibited better storability than the bronze cultivars in terms of maintaining their quality factors closest to the initial values. Among the bronze cultivars, GV exhibited the best storability. Overall, the order of storability of muscadine cultivars was SU, PA, AL, GV, TR, and HA.
麝香葡萄基因型对采后果实质量和贮藏性的影响
在 4 °C 冷藏 42 天期间,研究了六个商业麝香葡萄品种(三个紫色品种:'Alachua' (AL)、'Paulk' (PA) 和'Supreme' (SU);三个青铜色品种:'Granny Val' (GV)、'Hall' (HA) 和'Triumph' (TR))全果、果皮和果肉的生物活性化合物和抗氧化活性的采后变化,以及颜色、重量和硬度的变化。到第 42 天时,重量损失明显增加(P < 0.05),其中 SU 损失 5.79%,HA 损失 8.23%。冷藏期间,坚固度明显下降(P <0.05),贮藏结束时,SU 的坚固度最高(164.02 g mm-1),HA 的坚固度最低(110.75 g mm-1)。总可溶性固形物(TSS)、可滴定酸度(TA)及其比率(TSS/TA)在不同栽培品种和不同部位的果实之间存在差异,紫色栽培品种的可滴定酸度(TA)始终高于青铜色栽培品种,而青铜色栽培品种的 TSS/TA 比率较高。各栽培品种(全果)的 TSS 从 13.25%到 16.8%不等,TA 从 0.62%到 0.84%不等,TSS/TA 比率从 20.53 到 41.23 不等。HA(15.32%)和 TR(15.32%)的总悬浮固体含量最高,而 GV 的总悬浮固体含量最低,为 13.25%。就 TA 值而言,AL 的 TA 值最高,为 0.86%,而 HA(0.46%)和 TR(0.51%)的 TA 值最低。TSS/TA 比率范围从 AL 的 18.31 到 HA 的 36.85,分别代表最低和最高比率。紫色栽培品种和青铜色栽培品种的颜色参数存在差异,紫色栽培品种的 a*(红色成分)较高,而青铜色栽培品种的 L* 和 C* 值较高(颜色更浅、更纯);紫色栽培品种和青铜色栽培品种的 h° 值也存在显著差异(P <0.05),但各组内无差异。紫色品种的总花青素浓度(TAC)(8.4-15.31 mg L-1)、总酚含量(TPC)(92.11-107.01 mg GAE L-1)和总抗氧化活性(TAA)(150.25-250.05 μmoles L-1)均高于青铜色品种,而且果皮中这些生物活性化合物的含量也高于果肉。AL的TAC最高,为15.31毫克/升,其次是SU(13.01毫克/升)和PA(8.4毫克/升)。在 TPC 方面,AL(107.01 毫克 GAE L-1)和 SU(92.11 毫克 GAE L-1)含量最高,PA(74.89 毫克 GAE L-1)次之。在青铜色栽培品种中,TR 的 TPC 最高(61.41 毫克 GAE L-1),而 GV 最低(35.09 毫克 GAE L-1)。紫色品种的 TAA 在全果中约为 250 至 134 μmoles L-1 TE,果皮中约为 500 至 319 μmoles L-1,果肉中约为 17 至 10 μmoles L-1,而青铜色品种的 TAA 在全果中约为 122 至 56 μmoles L-1 TE,果皮中约为 248 至 120 μmoles L-1,果肉中约为 16 至 10 μmoles L-1。在冷藏过程中,果皮和果肉中的 TAC、TPC 和 TAA 都有所下降,但果皮的下降幅度更大。三个紫色栽培品种中的两个(SU 和 AL)比三个青铜色栽培品种在果皮中保持了更多的 TAC、TPC 和 TAA。根据我们的结果,紫色麝香葡萄栽培品种 SU,其次是紫色 PA 和 AL,在保持其品质因数最接近初始值方面比青铜色栽培品种表现出更好的贮藏性。在青铜栽培品种中,GV 的贮藏性最好。总体而言,麝香葡萄栽培品种的贮藏性依次为 SU、PA、AL、GV、TR 和 HA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Botany
South African Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.70%
发文量
709
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Botany publishes original papers that deal with the classification, biodiversity, morphology, physiology, molecular biology, ecology, biotechnology, ethnobotany and other botanically related aspects of species that are of importance to southern Africa. Manuscripts dealing with significant new findings on other species of the world and general botanical principles will also be considered and are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信