Ying Wang , Yanan Chen , Jianguang Wen , Chaoyang Wu , Wei Zhou , Lei Han , Xuguang Tang
{"title":"Early warning of drought-induced vegetation stress using multiple satellite-based ecological indicators","authors":"Ying Wang , Yanan Chen , Jianguang Wen , Chaoyang Wu , Wei Zhou , Lei Han , Xuguang Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Droughts have posed, and continue to pose, severe risks to terrestrial ecosystems. Particularly against the backdrop of global climate change, the intensity and frequency of extreme droughts are expected to further aggravate. However, a significant gap persists in early drought warning for vegetation monitoring. Therefore, this study examined the spatial and temporal dynamics of two summer drought events happened in Southwest China in 2011 and 2022, and analyzed the early responses of four ecological indicators including global Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) SIF dataset (GOSIF), the leaf-scale fluorescence yield (<span><math><msub><mi>Φ</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></math></span>), the near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv) and<!--> <!-->the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to drought extremes. All these indicators successfully captured the drought-induced vegetation stress, but as a proxy for vegetation photosynthesis, GOSIF was the most sensitive. Specifically, during the 2022 drought, GOSIF fell below the baseline year as early as day of year (DOY) 193, whereas NIRv and NDVI began at DOY 201, and <span><math><msub><mi>Φ</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></math></span> lagged severely. Similar behaviour was also found in the drought period of 2011. Overall, compared to the baseline year, GOSIF, <span><math><msub><mi>Φ</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></math></span>, NIRv and NDVI decreased by 96.93 %, 54.11 %, 43.92 % and 17.03 % in 2011, and reduced by 70.00 %, 42.01 %, 48.74 % and 19.53 % in 2022, respectively. During the past two decades, GOSIF exhibited the strongest correlation with drought intensity (<em>r</em> = 0.880, <em>p</em> < 0.05), followed by NIRv (<em>r</em> = 0.875, <em>p</em> < 0.05) and NDVI (<em>r</em> = 0.871, <em>p</em> < 0.05), and <span><math><msub><mi>Φ</mi><mi>f</mi></msub></math></span> was the weakest (<em>r</em> = 0.432, <em>p</em> > 0.05). Spatially, the proportion of areas where the correlations exceeded 0.6 by GOSIF and NIRv were 42.39 % and 39.32 %, respectively. In summary, this study demonstrated that global re-constructed GOSIF possesses considerable potential as an early warning indicator for vegetation drought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112857"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Droughts have posed, and continue to pose, severe risks to terrestrial ecosystems. Particularly against the backdrop of global climate change, the intensity and frequency of extreme droughts are expected to further aggravate. However, a significant gap persists in early drought warning for vegetation monitoring. Therefore, this study examined the spatial and temporal dynamics of two summer drought events happened in Southwest China in 2011 and 2022, and analyzed the early responses of four ecological indicators including global Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) SIF dataset (GOSIF), the leaf-scale fluorescence yield (), the near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to drought extremes. All these indicators successfully captured the drought-induced vegetation stress, but as a proxy for vegetation photosynthesis, GOSIF was the most sensitive. Specifically, during the 2022 drought, GOSIF fell below the baseline year as early as day of year (DOY) 193, whereas NIRv and NDVI began at DOY 201, and lagged severely. Similar behaviour was also found in the drought period of 2011. Overall, compared to the baseline year, GOSIF, , NIRv and NDVI decreased by 96.93 %, 54.11 %, 43.92 % and 17.03 % in 2011, and reduced by 70.00 %, 42.01 %, 48.74 % and 19.53 % in 2022, respectively. During the past two decades, GOSIF exhibited the strongest correlation with drought intensity (r = 0.880, p < 0.05), followed by NIRv (r = 0.875, p < 0.05) and NDVI (r = 0.871, p < 0.05), and was the weakest (r = 0.432, p > 0.05). Spatially, the proportion of areas where the correlations exceeded 0.6 by GOSIF and NIRv were 42.39 % and 39.32 %, respectively. In summary, this study demonstrated that global re-constructed GOSIF possesses considerable potential as an early warning indicator for vegetation drought.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.