A.C.B. Bakker , A.C.R. Gleason , A.C. Dempsey , S. Bachman , D. Burdick , A.M. Tarano , V. Chirayath , S.J. Purkis
{"title":"Remotely sensed spectral variability predicts reef fish diversity","authors":"A.C.B. Bakker , A.C.R. Gleason , A.C. Dempsey , S. Bachman , D. Burdick , A.M. Tarano , V. Chirayath , S.J. Purkis","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In terrestrial landscapes, the spectral variability hypothesis (SVH) enables estimation of species diversity from satellite data, thereby allowing biodiversity assessments to be upscaled. Whether the SVH works in the marine realm is an open question. To answer it, we tested the ability of this hypothesis to retrieve coral reef fish biodiversity from two remote sensing platforms on a global transect of reef sites. From orbit, we trialed the multispectral and panchromatic bands of WorldView-2 (WV-2) which have a spatial resolution of 2.5 and 0.5 m, respectively. At 100 times finer resolution, we repeated the experiment using unpiloted aerial vehicle (UAV) data. Encouragingly, the SVH evidently works as well in water as has been reported on land. Spectral variability was positively correlated with fish diversity for all sensors, though the area in which the variability was computed (window size) was important. The strongest relationship between spectral variability and fish biodiversity (R = 0.48) was returned using UAV imagery corrected for surface artifacts via fluid lensing. Splitting fish into herbivores, corallivores, and piscivores revealed that different feeding strategies correlate to spectral variability at different scales. Based on our results, we contend that remote sensing data are underutilized when used to simply map benthic habitat. Spectral variation can clearly serve as a proxy for <em>in situ</em> reef biodiversity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112823"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In terrestrial landscapes, the spectral variability hypothesis (SVH) enables estimation of species diversity from satellite data, thereby allowing biodiversity assessments to be upscaled. Whether the SVH works in the marine realm is an open question. To answer it, we tested the ability of this hypothesis to retrieve coral reef fish biodiversity from two remote sensing platforms on a global transect of reef sites. From orbit, we trialed the multispectral and panchromatic bands of WorldView-2 (WV-2) which have a spatial resolution of 2.5 and 0.5 m, respectively. At 100 times finer resolution, we repeated the experiment using unpiloted aerial vehicle (UAV) data. Encouragingly, the SVH evidently works as well in water as has been reported on land. Spectral variability was positively correlated with fish diversity for all sensors, though the area in which the variability was computed (window size) was important. The strongest relationship between spectral variability and fish biodiversity (R = 0.48) was returned using UAV imagery corrected for surface artifacts via fluid lensing. Splitting fish into herbivores, corallivores, and piscivores revealed that different feeding strategies correlate to spectral variability at different scales. Based on our results, we contend that remote sensing data are underutilized when used to simply map benthic habitat. Spectral variation can clearly serve as a proxy for in situ reef biodiversity.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.