“Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”

Anna Biasin , Helen Toxopeus , Davide Pettenella , Friedemann Polzin , Mauro Masiero
{"title":"“Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”","authors":"Anna Biasin ,&nbsp;Helen Toxopeus ,&nbsp;Davide Pettenella ,&nbsp;Friedemann Polzin ,&nbsp;Mauro Masiero","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based Solutions (NBS) are increasingly recognized as relevant strategies for mitigating the pressures coming from urbanization and climate change to build resilient and sustainable cities. However, securing financing for urban NBS is a persistent barrier for their widespread implementation. Therefore, understanding how to realize (co-)finance and funding by attracting resources from specific stakeholders – namely those that benefit from NBS - is essential to their expansion. While the need for NBS co-finance has been acknowledged, the funders' perspective on NBS has remained largely conceptual. Through a systematic review of the scientific literature this study identifies barriers and corresponding strategies for financing urban NBS from the funders'-oriented perspective. Knowledge sharing, fostering of innovative and alternative financing models and collaboration, also for co-financing, are among the most cited strategies to leverage other financial resources for NBS implementation and overcoming the budget shortfalls generally affecting public actors. We conclude by proposing future research avenues. Particularly, we suggest that the role of specific classes of stakeholders, namely corporations, the insurance sector, real estate firms and water utilities, should be investigated further since their contributions is likely to be relevant for the upscaling of NBS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NBS) are increasingly recognized as relevant strategies for mitigating the pressures coming from urbanization and climate change to build resilient and sustainable cities. However, securing financing for urban NBS is a persistent barrier for their widespread implementation. Therefore, understanding how to realize (co-)finance and funding by attracting resources from specific stakeholders – namely those that benefit from NBS - is essential to their expansion. While the need for NBS co-finance has been acknowledged, the funders' perspective on NBS has remained largely conceptual. Through a systematic review of the scientific literature this study identifies barriers and corresponding strategies for financing urban NBS from the funders'-oriented perspective. Knowledge sharing, fostering of innovative and alternative financing models and collaboration, also for co-financing, are among the most cited strategies to leverage other financial resources for NBS implementation and overcoming the budget shortfalls generally affecting public actors. We conclude by proposing future research avenues. Particularly, we suggest that the role of specific classes of stakeholders, namely corporations, the insurance sector, real estate firms and water utilities, should be investigated further since their contributions is likely to be relevant for the upscaling of NBS.
"资助城市自然解决方案(NBS):从资助者角度的文献综述"
人们日益认识到,基于自然的解决方案(NBS)是减轻城市化和气候变化带来的压力,建设具有抗灾能力和可持续发展城市的相关战略。然而,为城市 NBS 筹集资金一直是其广泛实施的障碍。因此,了解如何通过吸引特定利益相关方--即那些从国家可持续发展战略中受益的利益相关方--的资源来实现(共同)融资和筹资,对其推广至关重要。虽然人们已经认识到了非核心预算系统共同融资的必要性,但资金提供者对非核心预算系统的看法在很大程度上仍然停留在概念上。本研究通过对科学文献的系统回顾,从资助者的角度确定了城市非核心预算系统融资的障碍和相应策略。知识共享、促进创新和替代性融资模式以及合作(也包括共同融资)是被引用最多的战略,这些战略可以利用其他财政资源来实施国家基础科学计划,并克服普遍影响公共参与者的预算短缺问题。最后,我们提出了未来的研究方向。特别是,我们建议进一步研究特定利益相关者的作用,即公司、保险部门、房地产公司和水务公司,因为他们的贡献可能与国家预算系统的升级有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信