{"title":"Concurrent design optimization of powertrain component modules in a family of electric vehicles","authors":"Maurizio Clemente, Mauro Salazar, Theo Hofman","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a modeling and optimization framework to design powertrains for a family of electric vehicles, focusing on the concurrent sizing of their motors and batteries. Whilst tailoring these component modules to each individual vehicle type can minimize energy consumption, it can result in high production costs due to the variety of component modules to be realized for the family of vehicles, driving the Total Costs of Ownership (TCO) high. Against this backdrop, we explore modularity and standardization strategies whereby we jointly design unique motor and battery modules to be installed in all the vehicles in the family, using a different number of these modules when needed. Such an approach results in higher production volumes of the same component module, entailing significantly lower manufacturing costs due to Economy-of-Scale (EoS) effects, and hence a potentially lower TCO for the family of vehicles. To solve the resulting “one-size-fits-all” problem, we instantiate a nested framework consisting of an inner convex optimization routine which jointly optimizes the modules’ sizes and the powertrain operation of the entire family, for given driving cycles and modules’ multiplicities. Likewise, we devise an outer loop comparing each configuration to identify the minimum-TCO solution with global optimality guarantees. Finally, we showcase our framework on a case study for the Tesla vehicle family in a benchmark design problem, considering the Model S, Model 3, Model X, and Model Y. Our results show that, compared to an individually tailored design, the application of our concurrent design optimization framework achieves a significant reduction of the production costs for a minimal increase in operational costs, ultimately lowering the family TCO in the benchmark design problem by 3.5%. Moreover, our concurrent design optimization methodology can reduce the TCO by up to 17% for the market conditions considered in our sensitivity study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 124840"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924022232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present a modeling and optimization framework to design powertrains for a family of electric vehicles, focusing on the concurrent sizing of their motors and batteries. Whilst tailoring these component modules to each individual vehicle type can minimize energy consumption, it can result in high production costs due to the variety of component modules to be realized for the family of vehicles, driving the Total Costs of Ownership (TCO) high. Against this backdrop, we explore modularity and standardization strategies whereby we jointly design unique motor and battery modules to be installed in all the vehicles in the family, using a different number of these modules when needed. Such an approach results in higher production volumes of the same component module, entailing significantly lower manufacturing costs due to Economy-of-Scale (EoS) effects, and hence a potentially lower TCO for the family of vehicles. To solve the resulting “one-size-fits-all” problem, we instantiate a nested framework consisting of an inner convex optimization routine which jointly optimizes the modules’ sizes and the powertrain operation of the entire family, for given driving cycles and modules’ multiplicities. Likewise, we devise an outer loop comparing each configuration to identify the minimum-TCO solution with global optimality guarantees. Finally, we showcase our framework on a case study for the Tesla vehicle family in a benchmark design problem, considering the Model S, Model 3, Model X, and Model Y. Our results show that, compared to an individually tailored design, the application of our concurrent design optimization framework achieves a significant reduction of the production costs for a minimal increase in operational costs, ultimately lowering the family TCO in the benchmark design problem by 3.5%. Moreover, our concurrent design optimization methodology can reduce the TCO by up to 17% for the market conditions considered in our sensitivity study.
我们提出了一个建模和优化框架,用于设计电动汽车系列的动力系统,重点是同时确定电机和电池的尺寸。虽然为每种车型量身定制这些组件模块可以最大限度地降低能耗,但由于要为汽车家族实现各种组件模块,这可能会导致生产成本居高不下,从而使总体拥有成本(TCO)居高不下。在此背景下,我们探索了模块化和标准化战略,即共同设计独特的电机和电池模块,安装在系列中的所有车辆上,并在需要时使用不同数量的这些模块。这种方法可以提高相同组件模块的产量,从而在规模经济效应(EoS)的作用下大幅降低制造成本,进而降低汽车家族的总体拥有成本。为了解决由此产生的 "一刀切 "问题,我们建立了一个嵌套框架,该框架由一个内凸优化程序组成,在给定的驾驶周期和模块倍率条件下,共同优化模块尺寸和整个系列的动力总成运行。同样,我们还设计了一个外循环,对每种配置进行比较,以确定具有全局最优性保证的最小总拥有成本解决方案。最后,我们在特斯拉汽车家族的基准设计问题案例研究中展示了我们的框架,考虑了 Model S、Model 3、Model X 和 Model Y。我们的结果表明,与单独定制的设计相比,应用我们的并发设计优化框架能以最小的运营成本增幅显著降低生产成本,最终将基准设计问题中的家族总拥有成本降低了 3.5%。此外,在敏感性研究中考虑的市场条件下,我们的并行设计优化方法最多可将总拥有成本降低 17%。
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.