Mining individual daily commuting patterns of dockless bike-sharing users: A two-layer framework integrating spatiotemporal flow clustering and rule-based decision trees

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Caigang Zhuang , Shaoying Li , Haoming Zhuang , Xiaoping Liu
{"title":"Mining individual daily commuting patterns of dockless bike-sharing users: A two-layer framework integrating spatiotemporal flow clustering and rule-based decision trees","authors":"Caigang Zhuang ,&nbsp;Shaoying Li ,&nbsp;Haoming Zhuang ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of dockless bike-sharing systems has led to increased interest in using bike-sharing data for sustainable transportation and travel behavior research. However, these studies have rarely focused on the individual daily mobility patterns, hindering their alignment with the increasingly refined needs of active transportation planning. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a two-layer framework, integrating improved flow clustering methods and multiple rule-based decision trees, to mine individual cyclists' daily home-work commuting patterns from dockless bike-sharing trip data with user IDs. The effectiveness and applicability of the framework is demonstrated by over 200 million bike-sharing trip records in Shenzhen. Based on the mining results, we obtain two categories of bike-sharing commuters (74.38 % of <em>Only-biking commuters</em> and 25.62 % of <em>Biking-with-transit commuters</em>) and some interesting findings about their daily commuting patterns. For instance, lots of bike-sharing commuters live near urban villages and old communities with lower costs of living, especially in the central city. <em>Only-biking commuters</em> have a higher proportion of overtime than <em>Biking-with-transit commuters</em>, and the Longhua Industrial Park, a manufacturing-oriented area, has the longest average working hours (over 10 h per day). Moreover, massive users utilize bike-sharing for commuting to work more frequently than for returning home, which is intricately related to the over-demand for bikes around workplaces during commuting peak. In sum, this framework offers a cost-effective way to understand the nuanced non-motorized mobility patterns and low-carbon trip chains of residents. It also offers novel insights for improving the operations of bike-sharing services and planning of active transportation modes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 105985"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724008096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of dockless bike-sharing systems has led to increased interest in using bike-sharing data for sustainable transportation and travel behavior research. However, these studies have rarely focused on the individual daily mobility patterns, hindering their alignment with the increasingly refined needs of active transportation planning. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a two-layer framework, integrating improved flow clustering methods and multiple rule-based decision trees, to mine individual cyclists' daily home-work commuting patterns from dockless bike-sharing trip data with user IDs. The effectiveness and applicability of the framework is demonstrated by over 200 million bike-sharing trip records in Shenzhen. Based on the mining results, we obtain two categories of bike-sharing commuters (74.38 % of Only-biking commuters and 25.62 % of Biking-with-transit commuters) and some interesting findings about their daily commuting patterns. For instance, lots of bike-sharing commuters live near urban villages and old communities with lower costs of living, especially in the central city. Only-biking commuters have a higher proportion of overtime than Biking-with-transit commuters, and the Longhua Industrial Park, a manufacturing-oriented area, has the longest average working hours (over 10 h per day). Moreover, massive users utilize bike-sharing for commuting to work more frequently than for returning home, which is intricately related to the over-demand for bikes around workplaces during commuting peak. In sum, this framework offers a cost-effective way to understand the nuanced non-motorized mobility patterns and low-carbon trip chains of residents. It also offers novel insights for improving the operations of bike-sharing services and planning of active transportation modes.
挖掘无桩共享单车用户的个人日常通勤模式:整合时空流量聚类和基于规则的决策树的双层框架
随着无桩共享单车系统的兴起,人们对利用共享单车数据进行可持续交通和出行行为研究的兴趣与日俱增。然而,这些研究很少关注个人的日常移动模式,这阻碍了它们与日益完善的主动交通规划需求相一致。为了弥补这一差距,本文提出了一个双层框架,整合了改进的流量聚类方法和多个基于规则的决策树,从带有用户 ID 的无桩共享单车出行数据中挖掘单个骑车人的日常上下班通勤模式。深圳 2 亿多条共享单车出行记录证明了该框架的有效性和适用性。根据挖掘结果,我们得到了两类共享单车通勤者(74.38%的只骑共享单车通勤者和25.62%的骑共享单车乘公交通勤者)以及关于他们日常通勤模式的一些有趣发现。例如,许多共享单车通勤者居住在生活成本较低的城中村和老社区附近,尤其是在中心城区。只骑共享单车通勤者的加班比例高于骑共享单车并搭乘公交车的通勤者,而龙华工业园区这一制造业聚集区的平均工作时间最长(每天超过 10 小时)。此外,大量用户使用共享单车上下班的频率高于回家的频率,这与上下班高峰期工作场所周边对共享单车的过度需求密切相关。总之,这一框架为了解居民细微的非机动交通模式和低碳出行链提供了一种经济有效的方法。它还为改善共享单车服务的运营和主动交通模式的规划提供了新颖的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信