Factors influencing smallholder participation in commercial tree growing outgrower schemes: The case of Namwasa outgrower scheme in Uganda

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Sherry Kyamagero , Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz , Nelson Turyahabwe , Gerald Kapp
{"title":"Factors influencing smallholder participation in commercial tree growing outgrower schemes: The case of Namwasa outgrower scheme in Uganda","authors":"Sherry Kyamagero ,&nbsp;Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz ,&nbsp;Nelson Turyahabwe ,&nbsp;Gerald Kapp","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past 30 years, outgrower/contract farming has been promoted as an institutional innovation to boost agricultural and farm forestry in less developed countries. Understanding factors that make outgrower arrangements beneficial is crucial to realizing their full potential. This study examines a commercial tree-growing outgrower scheme in Uganda, assessing socioeconomic factors influencing farmers' participation and their motivations. Data collection utilized a mixed-method approach, including semi-structured interviews (<em>n</em> = 80), focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. Findings revealed that participation was significantly associated with the purpose for the trees (χ<sup>2</sup> = 19.7875, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.00005), membership in farmer-based organizations (χ<sup>2</sup> = 76.05, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 2.77E-18), and household size (χ<sup>2</sup> = 14.12667, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.000856). Key motivations were access to quality seedlings, rated very important by 95 % of respondents, and farm credits, rated very important and important by 43.8 % and 36.3 % of farmers, respectively. Additionally, 96.3 % and 95 % considered training in agrochemical application and in planting, maintenance, and harvesting techniques, respectively, as very important. Most farmers (93 %) preferred on-spot cash payment over payment in kind. 55 % of farmers preferred donation with charge while 45 % preferred purchasing inputs at a subsidized price. Most farmers (65 %) favored a cost-sharing arrangement for harvesting costs, and 98 % wanted the company to cover post-harvest expenses. This study highlights the need of considering farmers' socioeconomic characteristics and preferences for contractual arrangements when designing outgrower schemes, as well providing seedlings, financial support, and training to enhance participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, outgrower/contract farming has been promoted as an institutional innovation to boost agricultural and farm forestry in less developed countries. Understanding factors that make outgrower arrangements beneficial is crucial to realizing their full potential. This study examines a commercial tree-growing outgrower scheme in Uganda, assessing socioeconomic factors influencing farmers' participation and their motivations. Data collection utilized a mixed-method approach, including semi-structured interviews (n = 80), focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. Findings revealed that participation was significantly associated with the purpose for the trees (χ2 = 19.7875, p = 0.00005), membership in farmer-based organizations (χ2 = 76.05, p = 2.77E-18), and household size (χ2 = 14.12667, p = 0.000856). Key motivations were access to quality seedlings, rated very important by 95 % of respondents, and farm credits, rated very important and important by 43.8 % and 36.3 % of farmers, respectively. Additionally, 96.3 % and 95 % considered training in agrochemical application and in planting, maintenance, and harvesting techniques, respectively, as very important. Most farmers (93 %) preferred on-spot cash payment over payment in kind. 55 % of farmers preferred donation with charge while 45 % preferred purchasing inputs at a subsidized price. Most farmers (65 %) favored a cost-sharing arrangement for harvesting costs, and 98 % wanted the company to cover post-harvest expenses. This study highlights the need of considering farmers' socioeconomic characteristics and preferences for contractual arrangements when designing outgrower schemes, as well providing seedlings, financial support, and training to enhance participation.
影响小农参与商业林木外围种植计划的因素:乌干达 Namwasa 外包种植计划的案例
在过去的 30 年中,外包式种植/合同种植作为一种制度创新得到了推广,以促进欠发达国家的农业和农林业发展。要充分发挥外围种植安排的潜力,了解其有利因素至关重要。本研究考察了乌干达的一项商业树木种植外包商计划,评估了影响农民参与的社会经济因素及其动机。数据收集采用了混合方法,包括半结构式访谈(n = 80)、焦点小组讨论和关键信息提供者访谈。调查结果显示,参与与植树目的(χ2 = 19.7875,p = 0.00005)、农民组织成员资格(χ2 = 76.05,p = 2.77E-18)和家庭规模(χ2 = 14.12667,p = 0.000856)密切相关。主要动机是获得优质种苗(95% 的受访者认为非常重要)和农业信贷(分别有 43.8% 和 36.3% 的农民认为非常重要和重要)。此外,分别有 96.3% 和 95% 的受访者认为农用化学品应用培训以及种植、养护和收割技术培训非常重要。与实物支付相比,大多数农民(93%)更喜欢现场现金支付。55 % 的农民倾向于收费捐赠,45 % 的农民倾向于以补贴价格购买投入品。大多数农民(65%)赞成收获成本分摊安排,98%的农民希望公司承担收获后的费用。这项研究强调,在设计外围种植者计划时,有必要考虑农民的社会经济特征和对合同安排的偏好,并提供种苗、资金支持和培训,以提高参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信