{"title":"Crowding-out or Calling-out? The influence of mandatory industry-related firm-specific information disclosure on analyst reports","authors":"Hui Liu , Yaxin Song , Long Zhang , Yuhuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To improve the information environment, the Chinese stock exchanges issued mandatory industry-related firm-specific information disclosure (<em>IFID</em>) guidelines for various industries in batches from 2013 to 2021. Utilizing the staggered implementation of <em>IFID</em> guidelines, we apply a staggered difference-in-difference method to assess analysts’ reactions to mandatory <em>IFID</em>. Our analysis, which employs text analysis and machine learning techniques, reveals that mandatory <em>IFID</em> stimulates more industry-related firm-specific information in analyst reports, supporting the calling-out effect of <em>IFID</em> on analyst reports. Furthermore, we document that <em>IFID</em> significantly reduces the text similarity of industry-related information across different analyst reports for the same firm, suggesting that analysts engage in more personalized, in-depth industry-related analyses rather than simply replicating the firm’s disclosed information post-<em>IFID</em>. Additionally, <em>IFID</em> prompts analysts to conduct more on-site visits to gather private information and produce more comprehensive industry-related insights. We also explore various factors that may influence the effectiveness of <em>IFID</em> at the industry, firm, and analyst levels. The heterogeneity test results show that the calling-out effect of <em>IFID</em> on analyst reports is strengthened by lower industry competition, better firm transparency, and higher analyst specialization. Overall, our study demonstrates that mandatory <em>IFID</em> in China improves the information environment by directly compelling listed firms to disclose more industry-related operating information and indirectly encouraging analysts to produce more differentiated and insightful analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 107266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To improve the information environment, the Chinese stock exchanges issued mandatory industry-related firm-specific information disclosure (IFID) guidelines for various industries in batches from 2013 to 2021. Utilizing the staggered implementation of IFID guidelines, we apply a staggered difference-in-difference method to assess analysts’ reactions to mandatory IFID. Our analysis, which employs text analysis and machine learning techniques, reveals that mandatory IFID stimulates more industry-related firm-specific information in analyst reports, supporting the calling-out effect of IFID on analyst reports. Furthermore, we document that IFID significantly reduces the text similarity of industry-related information across different analyst reports for the same firm, suggesting that analysts engage in more personalized, in-depth industry-related analyses rather than simply replicating the firm’s disclosed information post-IFID. Additionally, IFID prompts analysts to conduct more on-site visits to gather private information and produce more comprehensive industry-related insights. We also explore various factors that may influence the effectiveness of IFID at the industry, firm, and analyst levels. The heterogeneity test results show that the calling-out effect of IFID on analyst reports is strengthened by lower industry competition, better firm transparency, and higher analyst specialization. Overall, our study demonstrates that mandatory IFID in China improves the information environment by directly compelling listed firms to disclose more industry-related operating information and indirectly encouraging analysts to produce more differentiated and insightful analyses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.