Re-Examining interprofessional simulation: Using social identity theory to explore the influence of ‘profession’ on interprofessional learning

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Neil Harrison MMed , Susan Somerville PhD , Prashant Kumar MMed , Kathleen Collins MBChB
{"title":"Re-Examining interprofessional simulation: Using social identity theory to explore the influence of ‘profession’ on interprofessional learning","authors":"Neil Harrison MMed ,&nbsp;Susan Somerville PhD ,&nbsp;Prashant Kumar MMed ,&nbsp;Kathleen Collins MBChB","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>   In this article we explore and reflect upon a shared experience of interprofessional simulation-based education (IP-SBE) in the United Kingdom (UK) which caused us to discuss the assertion by the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) that “<em>interprofessional learning experiences help prepare future health professionals for enhanced team-based care of patients and improved population health outcomes</em>.” We utilized social identity theory (SIT) to consider the impact of ‘profession' on identity and its role in the behaviors we observed during an IP-SBE conference workshop. In this workshop the personal importance given to one's professional group dominated and hindered the opportunity for interprofessional group working and this reflected our experiences in IP-SBE more widely. Belonging to an 'in-group' is a strong force that, although at times a negative force, could be used to promote the ambitions of IP-SBE. IP-SBE sessions could look to form an 'in-group' based on a characteristic that is not clinical professional background and in doing so be more successful in attaining the aspirations of IPEC and the interprofessional educational community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   In this article we explore and reflect upon a shared experience of interprofessional simulation-based education (IP-SBE) in the United Kingdom (UK) which caused us to discuss the assertion by the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) that “interprofessional learning experiences help prepare future health professionals for enhanced team-based care of patients and improved population health outcomes.” We utilized social identity theory (SIT) to consider the impact of ‘profession' on identity and its role in the behaviors we observed during an IP-SBE conference workshop. In this workshop the personal importance given to one's professional group dominated and hindered the opportunity for interprofessional group working and this reflected our experiences in IP-SBE more widely. Belonging to an 'in-group' is a strong force that, although at times a negative force, could be used to promote the ambitions of IP-SBE. IP-SBE sessions could look to form an 'in-group' based on a characteristic that is not clinical professional background and in doing so be more successful in attaining the aspirations of IPEC and the interprofessional educational community.
重新审视跨专业模拟:利用社会认同理论探讨 "专业 "对跨专业学习的影响
在这篇文章中,我们探讨并反思了英国(UK)跨专业模拟教育(IP-SBE)的共同经历,这一经历促使我们讨论了跨专业教育合作组织(IPEC)的论断,即 "跨专业学习经历有助于培养未来的医疗专业人员,为患者提供更好的团队护理,并改善人群健康状况"。我们利用社会认同理论(SIT)来思考 "职业 "对认同的影响,以及它在我们在 IP-SBE 会议研讨会上观察到的行为中所起的作用。在这次研讨会上,个人对其专业团体的重视主导并阻碍了跨专业小组工作的机会,这也反映了我们在 IP-SBE 中更广泛的经验。属于 "内部群体 "是一种强大的力量,虽然有时是一种负面力量,但可以用来促进国际专业基础教育计划的雄心壮志。跨专业基础教育课程可以根据非临床专业背景的特点组建一个 "内群体",这样就能更成功地实现跨专业教育计划和跨专业教育团体的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信